Chapter Деконструктивные практики XIX века (от натуральной школы до Л.Н. Толстого) и Ф.М. Достоевский
Deconstruction in the 19th Century (from the Natural School to Leo Tolstoy) and Fyodor Dostoevsky. The modern understanding of deconstruction arose from post-structuralism and implies distrust of semblance, the outward appearance of any ideology or structure, together with the search for a hidden in...
Збережено в:
| Автори: | , |
|---|---|
| Формат: | Online |
| Мова: | Російська |
| Опубліковано: |
Firenze University Press
2023
|
| Предмети: | |
| Онлайн доступ: | ONIX_20230803_9791221501223_163 |
| Теги: |
Немає тегів, Будьте першим, хто поставить тег для цього запису!
|
| Резюме: | Deconstruction in the 19th Century (from the Natural School to Leo Tolstoy) and Fyodor Dostoevsky. The modern understanding of deconstruction arose from post-structuralism and implies distrust of semblance, the outward appearance of any ideology or structure, together with the search for a hidden interior. Dostoevsky renounces one-dimensionality and shows its deconstructing nature. He considers it a prejudice to believe that disclosing the hidden and forbidden has more “truth” in it, as is evident from his dispute with Tolstoy, who uses the principle of exposing the ignoble background of a supposedly noble national ideology to criticize the “defenders of the Slavic brothers” in Anna Karenina. Dostoevsky refuses to recognize the results of deconstruction (the denial of the declared) as the last and only version of the truth about reality. His approach can be defined as the “deconstruction of deconstruction.” |
|---|