Constituting Workers, Protecting Women

Constitutional considerations of protective laws for women were the analytical battlefield on which the legal community reworked the balance between private liberty and the state's authority to regulate. Julie Novkov focuses on the importance of gender as an analytical category for the legal system....

Volledige beschrijving

Bewaard in:
Bibliografische gegevens
Hoofdauteur: Novkov, Julie Lavonne
Formaat: Online
Taal:Engels
Gepubliceerd in: University of Michigan Press 2023
Onderwerpen:
Online toegang:ONIX_20230817_9780472022861_2
Tags: Voeg label toe
Geen labels, Wees de eerste die dit record labelt!
_version_ 1869525365121089536
author Novkov, Julie Lavonne
author_browse Novkov, Julie Lavonne
author_facet Novkov, Julie Lavonne
author_sort Novkov, Julie Lavonne
collection Directory of Open Access Books
description Constitutional considerations of protective laws for women were the analytical battlefield on which the legal community reworked the balance between private liberty and the state's authority to regulate. Julie Novkov focuses on the importance of gender as an analytical category for the legal system. During the Progressive Era and New Deal, courts often invalidated generalized protective legislation, but frequently upheld measures that limited women's terms and conditions of labor. The book explores the reasoning in such cases that were decided between 1873 and 1937. By analyzing all reported opinion on the state and federal level, as well as materials from the women's movement and briefs filed in the U.S. Supreme Court, the study demonstrates that considerations of cases involving women's measures ultimately came to drive the development of doctrine. The study combines historical institutionalism and feminism to address constitutional interpretation, showing that an analysis of conflict over the meaning of legal categories provides a deeper understanding of constitutional development. In doing so, it rejects purely political interpretations of the so-called Lochner era, in which the courts invalidated many legislative efforts to ameliorate the worst effects of capitalism. By addressing the dynamic interactions among interested laypersons, attorneys, and judges, it demonstrates that no individuals or institutions have complete control over the generation of constitutional meaning. Julie Novkov is Assistant Professor of Political Science, University of Oregon
format Online
id doab-20.500.12854ir-112865
institution Directory of Open Access Books
language eng
publishDate 2023
publishDateRange 2023
publishDateSort 2023
publisher University of Michigan Press
publisherStr University of Michigan Press
record_format ojs
spelling doab-20.500.12854ir-1128652025-02-04T09:14:15Z Constituting Workers, Protecting Women Novkov, Julie Lavonne Politics & government bic Book Industry Communication::J Society & social sciences::JP Politics & government thema EDItEUR::J Society and Social Sciences::JP Politics and government Constitutional considerations of protective laws for women were the analytical battlefield on which the legal community reworked the balance between private liberty and the state's authority to regulate. Julie Novkov focuses on the importance of gender as an analytical category for the legal system. During the Progressive Era and New Deal, courts often invalidated generalized protective legislation, but frequently upheld measures that limited women's terms and conditions of labor. The book explores the reasoning in such cases that were decided between 1873 and 1937. By analyzing all reported opinion on the state and federal level, as well as materials from the women's movement and briefs filed in the U.S. Supreme Court, the study demonstrates that considerations of cases involving women's measures ultimately came to drive the development of doctrine. The study combines historical institutionalism and feminism to address constitutional interpretation, showing that an analysis of conflict over the meaning of legal categories provides a deeper understanding of constitutional development. In doing so, it rejects purely political interpretations of the so-called Lochner era, in which the courts invalidated many legislative efforts to ameliorate the worst effects of capitalism. By addressing the dynamic interactions among interested laypersons, attorneys, and judges, it demonstrates that no individuals or institutions have complete control over the generation of constitutional meaning. Julie Novkov is Assistant Professor of Political Science, University of Oregon 2023-08-17T07:44:35Z 2023-08-17T07:44:35Z 2009 book ONIX_20230817_9780472022861_2 9780472022861 https://directory.doabooks.org/handle/20.500.12854/112865 eng image/jpeg Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International https://muse.jhu.edu/book/6313 University of Michigan Press b7359529-e5f7-4510-a59f-d7dafa1d4d17 9780472022861 332 open access
spellingShingle Politics & government
bic Book Industry Communication::J Society & social sciences::JP Politics & government
thema EDItEUR::J Society and Social Sciences::JP Politics and government
Novkov, Julie Lavonne
Constituting Workers, Protecting Women
title Constituting Workers, Protecting Women
title_full Constituting Workers, Protecting Women
title_fullStr Constituting Workers, Protecting Women
title_full_unstemmed Constituting Workers, Protecting Women
title_short Constituting Workers, Protecting Women
title_sort constituting workers protecting women
topic Politics & government
bic Book Industry Communication::J Society & social sciences::JP Politics & government
thema EDItEUR::J Society and Social Sciences::JP Politics and government
topic_facet Politics & government
bic Book Industry Communication::J Society & social sciences::JP Politics & government
thema EDItEUR::J Society and Social Sciences::JP Politics and government
url ONIX_20230817_9780472022861_2
work_keys_str_mv AT novkovjulielavonne constitutingworkersprotectingwomen