Omslagsbillede

The Potential of Blind Collaborative Justice

Biased expert testimony is a leading cause of wrongful convictions, and new techniques are needed to reduce such biases. RAND researchers conducted an experimental investigation of two potential contributors to biased testimony within adversarial litigation involving forensic evidence: (1) experts’...

Fuld beskrivelse

Saved in:
Main Authors: Wong, Carolyn, Aharoni, Eyal, Aliyev, Gursel Rafig oglu, Du Bois, Jacqueline
Format: Online
Sprog:engelsk
Udgivet: RAND Corporation 2023
Fag:
Law
Technology
thema EDItEUR::U Computing and Information Technology::UN Databases::UNA Database design and theory
thema EDItEUR::L Law::LA Jurisprudence and general issues::LAF Systems of law::LAFD Systems of law: civil codes / civil law
thema EDItEUR::L Law::LN Laws of specific jurisdictions and specific areas of law::LNF Criminal law: procedure and offences
thema EDItEUR::L Law::LN Laws of specific jurisdictions and specific areas of law::LNA Legal systems: general::LNAC Legal systems: civil procedure, litigation and dispute resolution::LNAC3 Civil procedure: law of evidence
Online adgang:ONIX_20231005_9780833093776_1366
Tags: Tilføj Tag
Ingen Tags, Vær først til at tagge denne postø!
Summary:Biased expert testimony is a leading cause of wrongful convictions, and new techniques are needed to reduce such biases. RAND researchers conducted an experimental investigation of two potential contributors to biased testimony within adversarial litigation involving forensic evidence: (1) experts’ knowledge of their party representation (i.e., prosecution vs. defense counsel), and (2) lack of input from the relevant scientific community.

Lignende værker