Ata uhi

State Ownership of Archaeological Heritage

This thesis examines and compares the State’s ownership of archaeological heritage in Switzerland and Turkey, two countries with contrasting political structures and archaeological contexts. The comparative analysis, which is based on both the movable and immovable parts of archaeological heritage,...

Whakaahuatanga katoa

I tiakina i:
Kaituhi matua: Velioğlu Yıldızcı, Ece
Hōputu: Online
Reo:Ingarihi
I whakaputaina: Helbing Lichtenhahn Verlag 2024
Ngā marau:
Archaeology
State ownership
Art law
thema EDItEUR::L Law::LN Laws of specific jurisdictions and specific areas of law::LNK Environment, transport and planning law: general::LNKX Protection of historic buildings and cultural assets
thema EDItEUR::N History and Archaeology::NK Archaeology
Urunga tuihono:ONIX_20240708_9783719047832_241
Ngā Tūtohu: Tāpirihia he Tūtohu
Kāore He Tūtohu, Me noho koe te mea tuatahi ki te tūtohu i tēnei pūkete!
Whakarāpopototanga:This thesis examines and compares the State’s ownership of archaeological heritage in Switzerland and Turkey, two countries with contrasting political structures and archaeological contexts. The comparative analysis, which is based on both the movable and immovable parts of archaeological heritage, is later used to formulate general recommendations applicable to other countries. Such recommendations are built on the Model Provisions on State Ownership of Undiscovered Cultural Objects elaborated by UNESCO and UNIDROIT. The recommendations propose that States go further than the Model Provisions by enacting laws that explicitly delineate the State’s duties regarding archaeological heritage protection and by reinforcing the ownership regimes for such heritage.

Ngā tūemi rite