Facts Before the European Court of Human Rights
Legal decision-making is not a ‘one way street’. Any legal analysis is based on a factual context. Before any legal analysis can commence, the facts of a given case have to be detangled and a decision is reached as to which facts are deemed relevant for the legal analysis that is to follow. The lega...
में बचाया:
| मुख्य लेखकों: | , |
|---|---|
| स्वरूप: | Online |
| भाषा: | अंग्रेज़ी |
| प्रकाशित: |
Nomos Verlagsgesellschaft mbH & Co. KG
2024
|
| विषय: | |
| ऑनलाइन पहुंच: | ONIX_20240708_9783748933229_256 |
| टैग: |
कोई टैग नहीं, इस रिकॉर्ड को टैग करने वाले पहले व्यक्ति बनें!
|
| _version_ | 1869524565552529408 |
|---|---|
| author | Schwarzen, Jürgen Hatje, Armin |
| author_browse | Hatje, Armin Schwarzen, Jürgen |
| author_facet | Schwarzen, Jürgen Hatje, Armin |
| author_sort | Schwarzen, Jürgen |
| collection | Directory of Open Access Books |
| description | Legal decision-making is not a ‘one way street’. Any legal analysis is based on a factual context. Before any legal analysis can commence, the facts of a given case have to be detangled and a decision is reached as to which facts are deemed relevant for the legal analysis that is to follow. The legal norms that are considered applicable to the factual circumstances will, in turn, bring into focus those facts that best fit under the legal norm. There is, thus, a back-and-forth between the factual and the normative; the factual gaze is influenced by the legal gaze and vice versa. It is the factual-side of this back-and-forth, that is of interest in this thesis. The contribution of this PhD thesis is that it suggests using principles of scientific method as fact-assessment criteria. These scientific principles are employed as a methodology to assess and criticise nine judgments by the ECtHR. In a nutshell, it is shown that reading and analysing the ECtHR’s case-law using the principles of scientific method, allows the detection of flaws in the factual analyses. A strong factual analysis, freed of logical flaws and inconsistencies, that is based on principles of scientific method, will provide a strong basis on which the legal analysis can then follow. Any in consistencies in the factual analyses will impact the legal assessment. This thesis aims at stressing the importance to pay more attention to the factual analysis in legal decision-making, and it outlines how a more appropriate factual analysis can be achieved. |
| format | Online |
| id | doab-20.500.12854ir-140026 |
| institution | Directory of Open Access Books |
| language | eng |
| publishDate | 2024 |
| publishDateRange | 2024 |
| publishDateSort | 2024 |
| publisher | Nomos Verlagsgesellschaft mbH & Co. KG |
| publisherStr | Nomos Verlagsgesellschaft mbH & Co. KG |
| record_format | ojs |
| spelling | doab-20.500.12854ir-1400262024-07-09T05:35:35Z Facts Before the European Court of Human Rights Schwarzen, Jürgen Hatje, Armin Schwarzen, Jürgen Hatje, Armin Human Rights Facts Fact-Finding Truth Legal Decision-Making European Court of Human Rights Interdisciplinarity thema EDItEUR::L Law::LB International law::LBB Public international law::LBBR Public international law: human rights thema EDItEUR::1 Place qualifiers::1Q Other geographical groupings: Oceans and seas, historical, political etc::1QF Political, socio-economic, cultural and strategic groupings::1QFE EU (European Union) Legal decision-making is not a ‘one way street’. Any legal analysis is based on a factual context. Before any legal analysis can commence, the facts of a given case have to be detangled and a decision is reached as to which facts are deemed relevant for the legal analysis that is to follow. The legal norms that are considered applicable to the factual circumstances will, in turn, bring into focus those facts that best fit under the legal norm. There is, thus, a back-and-forth between the factual and the normative; the factual gaze is influenced by the legal gaze and vice versa. It is the factual-side of this back-and-forth, that is of interest in this thesis. The contribution of this PhD thesis is that it suggests using principles of scientific method as fact-assessment criteria. These scientific principles are employed as a methodology to assess and criticise nine judgments by the ECtHR. In a nutshell, it is shown that reading and analysing the ECtHR’s case-law using the principles of scientific method, allows the detection of flaws in the factual analyses. A strong factual analysis, freed of logical flaws and inconsistencies, that is based on principles of scientific method, will provide a strong basis on which the legal analysis can then follow. Any in consistencies in the factual analyses will impact the legal assessment. This thesis aims at stressing the importance to pay more attention to the factual analysis in legal decision-making, and it outlines how a more appropriate factual analysis can be achieved. 2024-07-09T05:35:34Z 2024-07-09T05:35:34Z 2024-07-08T16:25:31Z 2022 book ONIX_20240708_9783748933229_256 https://library.oapen.org/handle/20.500.12657/91919 9783748933229 https://directory.doabooks.org/handle/20.500.12854/140026 eng open access image/jpeg Attribution 4.0 International https://library.oapen.org/bitstream/20.500.12657/91919/1/212002.pdf Nomos Verlagsgesellschaft mbH & Co. KG 10.5771/9783748933229 10.5771/9783748933229 20c8b06d-3b2b-4af2-acda-fbcfdfea5744 c9fff097-a6b0-4c97-afcd-d033f5f27a3d 07f61e34-5b96-49f0-9860-c87dd8228f26 9783748933229 Swiss National Science Foundation (SNF) Baden-Baden 10BP12_212002 Open Access Books Schweizerischer Nationalfonds zur Förderung der Wissenschaftlichen Forschung Swiss National Science Foundation 10.13039/501100001711 open access |
| spellingShingle | Human Rights Facts Fact-Finding Truth Legal Decision-Making European Court of Human Rights Interdisciplinarity thema EDItEUR::L Law::LB International law::LBB Public international law::LBBR Public international law: human rights thema EDItEUR::1 Place qualifiers::1Q Other geographical groupings: Oceans and seas, historical, political etc::1QF Political, socio-economic, cultural and strategic groupings::1QFE EU (European Union) Schwarzen, Jürgen Hatje, Armin Facts Before the European Court of Human Rights |
| title | Facts Before the European Court of Human Rights |
| title_full | Facts Before the European Court of Human Rights |
| title_fullStr | Facts Before the European Court of Human Rights |
| title_full_unstemmed | Facts Before the European Court of Human Rights |
| title_short | Facts Before the European Court of Human Rights |
| title_sort | facts before the european court of human rights |
| topic | Human Rights Facts Fact-Finding Truth Legal Decision-Making European Court of Human Rights Interdisciplinarity thema EDItEUR::L Law::LB International law::LBB Public international law::LBBR Public international law: human rights thema EDItEUR::1 Place qualifiers::1Q Other geographical groupings: Oceans and seas, historical, political etc::1QF Political, socio-economic, cultural and strategic groupings::1QFE EU (European Union) |
| topic_facet | Human Rights Facts Fact-Finding Truth Legal Decision-Making European Court of Human Rights Interdisciplinarity thema EDItEUR::L Law::LB International law::LBB Public international law::LBBR Public international law: human rights thema EDItEUR::1 Place qualifiers::1Q Other geographical groupings: Oceans and seas, historical, political etc::1QF Political, socio-economic, cultural and strategic groupings::1QFE EU (European Union) |
| url | ONIX_20240708_9783748933229_256 |
| work_keys_str_mv | AT schwarzenjurgen factsbeforetheeuropeancourtofhumanrights AT hatjearmin factsbeforetheeuropeancourtofhumanrights |