Przemoc filosemicka?
The authors were interested in the phenomena discussed in the Polish and foreign public debate as a sign of change in social awareness and a‘new openness in Polish-Jewish relations’ at the turn of the second decade of the twenty-first century. The authors pose a question as to whether we really face...
Сохранить в:
| Главные авторы: | , |
|---|---|
| Формат: | Online |
| Язык: | польский |
| Опубликовано: |
Instytut Badań Literackich Polskiej Akademii Nauk
2024
|
| Предметы: | |
| Online-ссылка: | ONIX_20240916_9788367957083_199 |
| Метки: |
Нет меток, Требуется 1-ая метка записи!
|
| _version_ | 1869513855773704192 |
|---|---|
| author | Janicka, Elżbieta Żukowski, Tomasz |
| author_browse | Janicka, Elżbieta Żukowski, Tomasz |
| author_facet | Janicka, Elżbieta Żukowski, Tomasz |
| author_sort | Janicka, Elżbieta |
| collection | Directory of Open Access Books |
| description | The authors were interested in the phenomena discussed in the Polish and foreign public debate as a sign of change in social awareness and a‘new openness in Polish-Jewish relations’ at the turn of the second decade of the twenty-first century. The authors pose a question as to whether we really face a new narrative about the past. The authors wanted to know whether, and to what extent, the conditions of the narrative have changed, together with the collective imaginarium contributing to the socio-cultural frame that organises the subject knowledge and is derived from research on the Holocaust, carried out in the last several years. The authors also asked whether, and how, the self-opinion of the dominant majority and its attitude to its own past and present have changed. Does the inclusion of all those who were formerly subjected to anti-Semitic violence happen? If yes, on what conditions? The authors examined Jolanta Dylewska’s film Po-lin (2008), the re-enactment of the liquidation of the Będzin ghetto (2010), RafałBetlejewski’s projects entitled Tęsknię za tobą, Żydzie[I miss you, Jew] and Płoniestodoła[The Burning Barn] (2010), commemorations of the ghetto footbridge over Chłodna Street in Warsaw (1996, 2007–2011), and Keret’s House in Warsaw (2012). The analysis of these artistic initiatives and cultural events, backed by the best of intentions, led the authors to the conclusion that the voice of the minority introduced into the mainstream of discourse is subject to restricting requirements, pressures and hierarchies, which very much resemble the old forms of discrimination. Furthermore, definitional oppression towards the minority, which transforms a subject into an object, is neither deconstructed nor subjugated. Quite the opposite: it is doing well. It consists in philo-Semitic violence. |
| format | Online |
| id | doab-20.500.12854ir-144992 |
| institution | Directory of Open Access Books |
| language | pol |
| publishDate | 2024 |
| publishDateRange | 2024 |
| publishDateSort | 2024 |
| publisher | Instytut Badań Literackich Polskiej Akademii Nauk |
| publisherStr | Instytut Badań Literackich Polskiej Akademii Nauk |
| record_format | ojs |
| spelling | doab-20.500.12854ir-1449922024-09-16T09:50:28Z Przemoc filosemicka? Janicka, Elżbieta Żukowski, Tomasz Janicka, Elżbieta Żukowski, Tomasz Polish-Jewish relations Holocaust antisemitism thema EDItEUR::N History and Archaeology::NH History::NHT History: specific events and topics::NHTZ Genocide and ethnic cleansing::NHTZ1 The Holocaust thema EDItEUR::J Society and Social Sciences::JH Sociology and anthropology::JHM Anthropology::JHMC Social and cultural anthropology The authors were interested in the phenomena discussed in the Polish and foreign public debate as a sign of change in social awareness and a‘new openness in Polish-Jewish relations’ at the turn of the second decade of the twenty-first century. The authors pose a question as to whether we really face a new narrative about the past. The authors wanted to know whether, and to what extent, the conditions of the narrative have changed, together with the collective imaginarium contributing to the socio-cultural frame that organises the subject knowledge and is derived from research on the Holocaust, carried out in the last several years. The authors also asked whether, and how, the self-opinion of the dominant majority and its attitude to its own past and present have changed. Does the inclusion of all those who were formerly subjected to anti-Semitic violence happen? If yes, on what conditions? The authors examined Jolanta Dylewska’s film Po-lin (2008), the re-enactment of the liquidation of the Będzin ghetto (2010), RafałBetlejewski’s projects entitled Tęsknię za tobą, Żydzie[I miss you, Jew] and Płoniestodoła[The Burning Barn] (2010), commemorations of the ghetto footbridge over Chłodna Street in Warsaw (1996, 2007–2011), and Keret’s House in Warsaw (2012). The analysis of these artistic initiatives and cultural events, backed by the best of intentions, led the authors to the conclusion that the voice of the minority introduced into the mainstream of discourse is subject to restricting requirements, pressures and hierarchies, which very much resemble the old forms of discrimination. Furthermore, definitional oppression towards the minority, which transforms a subject into an object, is neither deconstructed nor subjugated. Quite the opposite: it is doing well. It consists in philo-Semitic violence. 2024-09-16T09:50:26Z 2024-09-16T09:50:26Z 2016 book ONIX_20240916_9788367957083_199 9788367957083 9788364703805 https://directory.doabooks.org/handle/20.500.12854/144992 pol Współczesne badania nad polską literaturą i kulturą image/jpeg Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International https://www.7switch.com/fr/ebook/9788367957083/from/openedition https://books.openedition.org/iblpan/9748 Instytut Badań Literackich Polskiej Akademii Nauk 10.4000/books.iblpan.9748 The authors were interested in the phenomena discussed in the Polish and foreign public debate as a sign of change in social awareness and a‘new openness in Polish-Jewish relations’ at the turn of the second decade of the twenty-first century. The authors pose a question as to whether we really face a new narrative about the past. The authors wanted to know whether, and to what extent, the conditions of the narrative have changed, together with the collective imaginarium contributing to the socio-cultural frame that organises the subject knowledge and is derived from research on the Holocaust, carried out in the last several years. The authors also asked whether, and how, the self-opinion of the dominant majority and its attitude to its own past and present have changed. Does the inclusion of all those who were formerly subjected to anti-Semitic violence happen? If yes, on what conditions? The authors examined Jolanta Dylewska’s film Po-lin (2008), the re-enactment of the liquidation of the Będzin ghetto (2010), RafałBetlejewski’s projects entitled Tęsknię za tobą, Żydzie[I miss you, Jew] and Płoniestodoła[The Burning Barn] (2010), commemorations of the ghetto footbridge over Chłodna Street in Warsaw (1996, 2007–2011), and Keret’s House in Warsaw (2012). The analysis of these artistic initiatives and cultural events, backed by the best of intentions, led the authors to the conclusion that the voice of the minority introduced into the mainstream of discourse is subject to restricting requirements, pressures and hierarchies, which very much resemble the old forms of discrimination. Furthermore, definitional oppression towards the minority, which transforms a subject into an object, is neither deconstructed nor subjugated. Quite the opposite: it is doing well. It consists in philo-Semitic violence. 10.4000/books.iblpan.9748 477a500c-a33d-4a1b-a93c-25951fa98708 9788367957083 9788364703805 296 Warszawa open access |
| spellingShingle | Polish-Jewish relations Holocaust antisemitism thema EDItEUR::N History and Archaeology::NH History::NHT History: specific events and topics::NHTZ Genocide and ethnic cleansing::NHTZ1 The Holocaust thema EDItEUR::J Society and Social Sciences::JH Sociology and anthropology::JHM Anthropology::JHMC Social and cultural anthropology Janicka, Elżbieta Żukowski, Tomasz Przemoc filosemicka? |
| title | Przemoc filosemicka? |
| title_full | Przemoc filosemicka? |
| title_fullStr | Przemoc filosemicka? |
| title_full_unstemmed | Przemoc filosemicka? |
| title_short | Przemoc filosemicka? |
| title_sort | przemoc filosemicka |
| topic | Polish-Jewish relations Holocaust antisemitism thema EDItEUR::N History and Archaeology::NH History::NHT History: specific events and topics::NHTZ Genocide and ethnic cleansing::NHTZ1 The Holocaust thema EDItEUR::J Society and Social Sciences::JH Sociology and anthropology::JHM Anthropology::JHMC Social and cultural anthropology |
| topic_facet | Polish-Jewish relations Holocaust antisemitism thema EDItEUR::N History and Archaeology::NH History::NHT History: specific events and topics::NHTZ Genocide and ethnic cleansing::NHTZ1 The Holocaust thema EDItEUR::J Society and Social Sciences::JH Sociology and anthropology::JHM Anthropology::JHMC Social and cultural anthropology |
| url | ONIX_20240916_9788367957083_199 |
| work_keys_str_mv | AT janickaelzbieta przemocfilosemicka AT zukowskitomasz przemocfilosemicka |