Chapter L’automaticità previdenziale negata dalla Cassazione agli incolpevoli collaboratori

This paper critically examines the case law of Italian Supreme Court of Cassation that denies quasi dependant workers the application of the legal protection issuing public coverage of contributions’ omissions caused by principals who do not pay pension’s compulsory contributions due to INPS (which...

Cijeli opis

Spremljeno u:
Bibliografski detalji
Glavni autor: Casale, Davide
Format: Online
Jezik:talijanski
Izdano: Firenze University Press 2025
Teme:
Online pristup:ONIX_20241220_9791221505078_553
Oznake: Dodaj oznaku
Bez oznaka, Budi prvi tko označuje ovaj zapis!
_version_ 1869515630247411712
author Casale, Davide
author_browse Casale, Davide
author_facet Casale, Davide
author_sort Casale, Davide
collection Directory of Open Access Books
description This paper critically examines the case law of Italian Supreme Court of Cassation that denies quasi dependant workers the application of the legal protection issuing public coverage of contributions’ omissions caused by principals who do not pay pension’s compulsory contributions due to INPS (which is the main Italian social security authority). This protection is set out in Article 2116 of the Italian Civil Code, for the case of insolvency and of undeclared work. According to the author, this case law is based on a construction that is inconsistent with the textual tenor of the law and, moreover, it does not take into account the similarity of factual conditions between quasi dependant workers and employees, to whom this legal protection applies.
format Online
id doab-20.500.12854ir-149933
institution Directory of Open Access Books
language ita
publishDate 2025
publishDateRange 2025
publishDateSort 2025
publisher Firenze University Press
publisherStr Firenze University Press
record_format ojs
spelling doab-20.500.12854ir-1499332025-07-21T15:45:27Z Chapter L’automaticità previdenziale negata dalla Cassazione agli incolpevoli collaboratori Casale, Davide Social security quasi dependant workers omissions of compulsory contributions payment public coverage of pensions’ funding thema EDItEUR::L Law::LN Laws of specific jurisdictions and specific areas of law::LNH Employment and labour law: general thema EDItEUR::L Law::LN Laws of specific jurisdictions and specific areas of law::LNH Employment and labour law: general This paper critically examines the case law of Italian Supreme Court of Cassation that denies quasi dependant workers the application of the legal protection issuing public coverage of contributions’ omissions caused by principals who do not pay pension’s compulsory contributions due to INPS (which is the main Italian social security authority). This protection is set out in Article 2116 of the Italian Civil Code, for the case of insolvency and of undeclared work. According to the author, this case law is based on a construction that is inconsistent with the textual tenor of the law and, moreover, it does not take into account the similarity of factual conditions between quasi dependant workers and employees, to whom this legal protection applies. 2025-01-17T12:41:32Z 2025-01-17T12:41:32Z 2024-12-20T12:50:54Z 2024 chapter ONIX_20241220_9791221505078_553 2704-5919 https://library.oapen.org/handle/20.500.12657/96761 9791221505078 https://directory.doabooks.org/handle/20.500.12854/149933 ita Studi e saggi open access image/jpeg Attribution 4.0 International https://library.oapen.org/bitstream/20.500.12657/96761/1/43097.pdf Firenze University Press 10.36253/979-12-215-0507-8.15 10.36253/979-12-215-0507-8.15 2ec4474d-93b1-4cfa-b313-9c6019b51b1a 9791221505078 17 Florence open access
spellingShingle Social security
quasi dependant workers
omissions of compulsory contributions payment
public coverage of pensions’ funding
thema EDItEUR::L Law::LN Laws of specific jurisdictions and specific areas of law::LNH Employment and labour law: general
thema EDItEUR::L Law::LN Laws of specific jurisdictions and specific areas of law::LNH Employment and labour law: general
Casale, Davide
Chapter L’automaticità previdenziale negata dalla Cassazione agli incolpevoli collaboratori
title Chapter L’automaticità previdenziale negata dalla Cassazione agli incolpevoli collaboratori
title_full Chapter L’automaticità previdenziale negata dalla Cassazione agli incolpevoli collaboratori
title_fullStr Chapter L’automaticità previdenziale negata dalla Cassazione agli incolpevoli collaboratori
title_full_unstemmed Chapter L’automaticità previdenziale negata dalla Cassazione agli incolpevoli collaboratori
title_short Chapter L’automaticità previdenziale negata dalla Cassazione agli incolpevoli collaboratori
title_sort chapter l automaticita previdenziale negata dalla cassazione agli incolpevoli collaboratori
topic Social security
quasi dependant workers
omissions of compulsory contributions payment
public coverage of pensions’ funding
thema EDItEUR::L Law::LN Laws of specific jurisdictions and specific areas of law::LNH Employment and labour law: general
thema EDItEUR::L Law::LN Laws of specific jurisdictions and specific areas of law::LNH Employment and labour law: general
topic_facet Social security
quasi dependant workers
omissions of compulsory contributions payment
public coverage of pensions’ funding
thema EDItEUR::L Law::LN Laws of specific jurisdictions and specific areas of law::LNH Employment and labour law: general
thema EDItEUR::L Law::LN Laws of specific jurisdictions and specific areas of law::LNH Employment and labour law: general
url ONIX_20241220_9791221505078_553
work_keys_str_mv AT casaledavide chapterlautomaticitaprevidenzialenegatadallacassazioneagliincolpevolicollaboratori