Chapter Methodological critique as a practice of knowledge creation (problem areas – an attempt of reconstruction)
The aim of the study is to reconstruct various ways of understanding methodological critique as a practice of knowledge creation and to indicate, revealed in connection with the reconstruction, the possibility of identifying cognitive obstacles that arise in this practice. Methodological critique is...
Guardat en:
| Autor principal: | |
|---|---|
| Format: | Online |
| Idioma: | polonès |
| Publicat: |
Wydawnictwo Uniwersytetu Łódzkiego
2025
|
| Accés en línia: | ONIX_20250307_9788381427166_493 |
| Etiquetes: |
Sense etiquetes, Sigues el primer a etiquetar aquest registre!
|
| _version_ | 1869524395757666304 |
|---|---|
| author | Piekarski, Jacek |
| author_browse | Piekarski, Jacek |
| author_facet | Piekarski, Jacek |
| author_sort | Piekarski, Jacek |
| collection | Directory of Open Access Books |
| description | The aim of the study is to reconstruct various ways of understanding methodological critique as a practice of knowledge creation and to indicate, revealed in connection with the reconstruction, the possibility of identifying cognitive obstacles that arise in this practice. Methodological critique is understood as a kind of practice – the field of thinking and acting – related to the experience and rationalization of the gap between the obviousness (faith) and the uncertainty of beliefs about reality. Various ways of formulating critique, related to the treatment of critique as the value underlying the ideal of rationality of science as well as a communication strategy, are discussed. Different ways of understanding critique legitimated under the distinguished concepts of methodology (as the theory of the application of laws of logic in various areas of research and a specialized discipline concerning the place of science in the system of human knowledge), are also discussed. On this basis, the possibilities of practicing a "critical methodology", designed as a study of methods for criticizing scientific practice in the changing cultural framework, are considered. In connection with the identified processes of their change (institutionalization of science, corporatization and networking of research), patterns of practicing critique justified by methodological premises (dogmatism, conventionalism and tactical discretion) were reconstructed and confronted with the cultural patterns of critique formed on their basis (inhibition, tolerantism and presentism). |
| format | Online |
| id | doab-20.500.12854ir-155068 |
| institution | Directory of Open Access Books |
| language | pol |
| publishDate | 2025 |
| publishDateRange | 2025 |
| publishDateSort | 2025 |
| publisher | Wydawnictwo Uniwersytetu Łódzkiego |
| publisherStr | Wydawnictwo Uniwersytetu Łódzkiego |
| record_format | ojs |
| spelling | doab-20.500.12854ir-1550682025-03-07T13:52:29Z Chapter Methodological critique as a practice of knowledge creation (problem areas – an attempt of reconstruction) Piekarski, Jacek The aim of the study is to reconstruct various ways of understanding methodological critique as a practice of knowledge creation and to indicate, revealed in connection with the reconstruction, the possibility of identifying cognitive obstacles that arise in this practice. Methodological critique is understood as a kind of practice – the field of thinking and acting – related to the experience and rationalization of the gap between the obviousness (faith) and the uncertainty of beliefs about reality. Various ways of formulating critique, related to the treatment of critique as the value underlying the ideal of rationality of science as well as a communication strategy, are discussed. Different ways of understanding critique legitimated under the distinguished concepts of methodology (as the theory of the application of laws of logic in various areas of research and a specialized discipline concerning the place of science in the system of human knowledge), are also discussed. On this basis, the possibilities of practicing a "critical methodology", designed as a study of methods for criticizing scientific practice in the changing cultural framework, are considered. In connection with the identified processes of their change (institutionalization of science, corporatization and networking of research), patterns of practicing critique justified by methodological premises (dogmatism, conventionalism and tactical discretion) were reconstructed and confronted with the cultural patterns of critique formed on their basis (inhibition, tolerantism and presentism). 2025-03-07T13:52:27Z 2025-03-07T13:52:27Z 2019 chapter ONIX_20250307_9788381427166_493 9788381427166 9788381427159 https://directory.doabooks.org/handle/20.500.12854/155068 pol image/jpeg Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International https://www.press.uni.lodz.pl/index.php/wul/catalog/book/1054 Wydawnictwo Uniwersytetu Łódzkiego 10.18778/8142-715-9.02 The aim of the study is to reconstruct various ways of understanding methodological critique as a practice of knowledge creation and to indicate, revealed in connection with the reconstruction, the possibility of identifying cognitive obstacles that arise in this practice. Methodological critique is understood as a kind of practice – the field of thinking and acting – related to the experience and rationalization of the gap between the obviousness (faith) and the uncertainty of beliefs about reality. Various ways of formulating critique, related to the treatment of critique as the value underlying the ideal of rationality of science as well as a communication strategy, are discussed. Different ways of understanding critique legitimated under the distinguished concepts of methodology (as the theory of the application of laws of logic in various areas of research and a specialized discipline concerning the place of science in the system of human knowledge), are also discussed. On this basis, the possibilities of practicing a "critical methodology", designed as a study of methods for criticizing scientific practice in the changing cultural framework, are considered. In connection with the identified processes of their change (institutionalization of science, corporatization and networking of research), patterns of practicing critique justified by methodological premises (dogmatism, conventionalism and tactical discretion) were reconstructed and confronted with the cultural patterns of critique formed on their basis (inhibition, tolerantism and presentism). 10.18778/8142-715-9.02 83bfe9c9-323d-4283-b087-d859fd9af314 9788381427166 9788381427159 15-64 open access |
| spellingShingle | Piekarski, Jacek Chapter Methodological critique as a practice of knowledge creation (problem areas – an attempt of reconstruction) |
| title | Chapter Methodological critique as a practice of knowledge creation (problem areas – an attempt of reconstruction) |
| title_full | Chapter Methodological critique as a practice of knowledge creation (problem areas – an attempt of reconstruction) |
| title_fullStr | Chapter Methodological critique as a practice of knowledge creation (problem areas – an attempt of reconstruction) |
| title_full_unstemmed | Chapter Methodological critique as a practice of knowledge creation (problem areas – an attempt of reconstruction) |
| title_short | Chapter Methodological critique as a practice of knowledge creation (problem areas – an attempt of reconstruction) |
| title_sort | chapter methodological critique as a practice of knowledge creation problem areas an attempt of reconstruction |
| url | ONIX_20250307_9788381427166_493 |
| work_keys_str_mv | AT piekarskijacek chaptermethodologicalcritiqueasapracticeofknowledgecreationproblemareasanattemptofreconstruction |