Chapter Perception and the nature of the phoneme
Traditional interpretations of the phoneme have viewed it either in terms of physical properties (Jones, 1944b), psychological reality (Sapir, 1933, cf. Jaeger, 1980), or function, typically to serve in opposition to other phonemes within a phonological system (Saussure, 1915, Trubetzkoy 1939, Penzl...
Αποθηκεύτηκε σε:
| Κύριος συγγραφέας: | |
|---|---|
| Μορφή: | Online |
| Γλώσσα: | Αγγλικά |
| Έκδοση: |
Wydawnictwo Uniwersytetu Łódzkiego
2025
|
| Θέματα: | |
| Διαθέσιμο Online: | ONIX_20250307_9788381429894_743 |
| Ετικέτες: |
Δεν υπάρχουν, Καταχωρήστε ετικέτα πρώτοι!
|
| _version_ | 1869515741915512832 |
|---|---|
| author | Callender, Craig |
| author_browse | Callender, Craig |
| author_facet | Callender, Craig |
| author_sort | Callender, Craig |
| collection | Directory of Open Access Books |
| description | Traditional interpretations of the phoneme have viewed it either in terms of physical properties (Jones, 1944b), psychological reality (Sapir, 1933, cf. Jaeger, 1980), or function, typically to serve in opposition to other phonemes within a phonological system (Saussure, 1915, Trubetzkoy 1939, Penzl, 1971). More recently, some phonologists have questioned the value of phonemes to phonological description in a post-generative world (Goldsmith, 1999). I argue that Sapir and Trubetzkoy’s ideas about the psychological reality of phonemes and the role of contrastive oppositions in sound systems are as relevant as ever, a claim justified by research in phonetics, which has demonstrated the importance of perception in some types of phonological change (Ohala, 1993, cf. Kuhl, 1991 and Sendlmeier, 2000). This chapter considers four examples of phonological contrast and change that may have been rooted in perception. First, fortis/lenis and geminate/singleton contrasts may constitute phonological oppositions when their members are perceived as different (Lisker, 1957, cf. Penzl, 1974). Second, perceptual ambiguity may have played a role in the lack of affricates post-vocalically for old short stops in Old High German texts (Callender, 2017). Third, perception may be relevant to understanding the English Great Vowel Shift. Liberman (1995) argued that the GVS had no beginning, in that there was always some degree of allophonic variation in vowels. To extend his analysis, I argue that it is the perception of new vowels that may have triggered the shift. Finally, I suggest that perceptual salience may be responsible for the maintenance of /ai/ before voiceless consonants in southern US English, where it is often monophthongized in other phonological environments. As each of the changes discussed is rooted in the perception of new sounds, phonological oppositions and psychological reality remain relevant to our understanding of phonemes. |
| format | Online |
| id | doab-20.500.12854ir-155318 |
| institution | Directory of Open Access Books |
| language | eng |
| publishDate | 2025 |
| publishDateRange | 2025 |
| publishDateSort | 2025 |
| publisher | Wydawnictwo Uniwersytetu Łódzkiego |
| publisherStr | Wydawnictwo Uniwersytetu Łódzkiego |
| record_format | ojs |
| spelling | doab-20.500.12854ir-1553182025-03-07T14:07:37Z Chapter Perception and the nature of the phoneme Callender, Craig narrative structure semiotic systems phonological oppositions cognitive grammar axiology validation descriptive grammar lexical semantics Traditional interpretations of the phoneme have viewed it either in terms of physical properties (Jones, 1944b), psychological reality (Sapir, 1933, cf. Jaeger, 1980), or function, typically to serve in opposition to other phonemes within a phonological system (Saussure, 1915, Trubetzkoy 1939, Penzl, 1971). More recently, some phonologists have questioned the value of phonemes to phonological description in a post-generative world (Goldsmith, 1999). I argue that Sapir and Trubetzkoy’s ideas about the psychological reality of phonemes and the role of contrastive oppositions in sound systems are as relevant as ever, a claim justified by research in phonetics, which has demonstrated the importance of perception in some types of phonological change (Ohala, 1993, cf. Kuhl, 1991 and Sendlmeier, 2000). This chapter considers four examples of phonological contrast and change that may have been rooted in perception. First, fortis/lenis and geminate/singleton contrasts may constitute phonological oppositions when their members are perceived as different (Lisker, 1957, cf. Penzl, 1974). Second, perceptual ambiguity may have played a role in the lack of affricates post-vocalically for old short stops in Old High German texts (Callender, 2017). Third, perception may be relevant to understanding the English Great Vowel Shift. Liberman (1995) argued that the GVS had no beginning, in that there was always some degree of allophonic variation in vowels. To extend his analysis, I argue that it is the perception of new vowels that may have triggered the shift. Finally, I suggest that perceptual salience may be responsible for the maintenance of /ai/ before voiceless consonants in southern US English, where it is often monophthongized in other phonological environments. As each of the changes discussed is rooted in the perception of new sounds, phonological oppositions and psychological reality remain relevant to our understanding of phonemes. 2025-03-07T14:07:35Z 2025-03-07T14:07:35Z 2020 chapter ONIX_20250307_9788381429894_743 9788381429894 9788381429887 9788363839666 9788364462573 https://directory.doabooks.org/handle/20.500.12854/155318 eng image/jpeg Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International https://www.press.uni.lodz.pl/index.php/wul/catalog/book/342 Wydawnictwo Uniwersytetu Łódzkiego 10.18778/8142-988-7.06 10.18778/8142-988-7.06 83bfe9c9-323d-4283-b087-d859fd9af314 9788381429894 9788381429887 9788363839666 9788364462573 53-65 open access |
| spellingShingle | narrative structure semiotic systems phonological oppositions cognitive grammar axiology validation descriptive grammar lexical semantics Callender, Craig Chapter Perception and the nature of the phoneme |
| title | Chapter Perception and the nature of the phoneme |
| title_full | Chapter Perception and the nature of the phoneme |
| title_fullStr | Chapter Perception and the nature of the phoneme |
| title_full_unstemmed | Chapter Perception and the nature of the phoneme |
| title_short | Chapter Perception and the nature of the phoneme |
| title_sort | chapter perception and the nature of the phoneme |
| topic | narrative structure semiotic systems phonological oppositions cognitive grammar axiology validation descriptive grammar lexical semantics |
| topic_facet | narrative structure semiotic systems phonological oppositions cognitive grammar axiology validation descriptive grammar lexical semantics |
| url | ONIX_20250307_9788381429894_743 |
| work_keys_str_mv | AT callendercraig chapterperceptionandthenatureofthephoneme |