Chapter Was the Serpent’s Argumentation Conclusive? A Few Words That Go back to the Beginning of our Reasoning as a Gift to the Knower of Rationality
The paper deals with the problem of transition in argumentation from a statement that everything except one is permitted to the conclusion that nothing is permitted; the motivation of the analysis is a story of the biblical serpent from Genesis 2-3. We suppose that the reasoning of the serpent is an...
Gardado en:
| Autor Principal: | |
|---|---|
| Formato: | Online |
| Idioma: | polaco |
| Publicado: |
Wydawnictwo Uniwersytetu Łódzkiego
2025
|
| Acceso en liña: | ONIX_20250307_9788382200355_798 |
| Tags: |
Sen Etiquetas, Sexa o primeiro en etiquetar este rexistro!
|
| Summary: | The paper deals with the problem of transition in argumentation from a statement that everything except one is permitted to the conclusion that nothing is permitted; the motivation of the analysis is a story of the biblical serpent from Genesis 2-3. We suppose that the reasoning of the serpent is an example of nonconclusive argumentation, i.e.. an argument pars pro toto (apparent enthymeme) which can be often found in contemporary argumentations. |
|---|