Chapter Is Dialetheism Where God of Religion and God of Philosophers Meet? More Questions than Answers
The article is devoted to the question if paradoxes concerning actions and attributes of God can be solved in dialetheists’ manner. For the adherents of dialetheism theological texts where the contradictory nature of God is shown constitute the proof of their main thesis. Moreover, in one version of...
Tallennettuna:
| Päätekijä: | |
|---|---|
| Aineistotyyppi: | Online |
| Kieli: | puola |
| Julkaistu: |
Wydawnictwo Uniwersytetu Łódzkiego
2025
|
| Linkit: | ONIX_20250307_9788382200355_801 |
| Tagit: |
Ei tageja, Lisää ensimmäinen tagi!
|
| _version_ | 1869524256271892480 |
|---|---|
| author | Rybarkiewicz, Dorota |
| author_browse | Rybarkiewicz, Dorota |
| author_facet | Rybarkiewicz, Dorota |
| author_sort | Rybarkiewicz, Dorota |
| collection | Directory of Open Access Books |
| description | The article is devoted to the question if paradoxes concerning actions and attributes of God can be solved in dialetheists’ manner. For the adherents of dialetheism theological texts where the contradictory nature of God is shown constitute the proof of their main thesis. Moreover, in one version of dialetheism the paradoxes imply that the very reality of God is inconsistent. This gives rise to the question if the classical criteria of truth apply to God. If one undermines the law of non-contradiction, the possibility to justify one’s stance is seriously reduced. In fact there are other possible causes of contradiction: equivocation, catachresis, crossing the limits of thought. As it seems, the most rational approach to inconsistency appearing in the description of God is to presume the logic that does not generate contradiction. |
| format | Online |
| id | doab-20.500.12854ir-155376 |
| institution | Directory of Open Access Books |
| language | pol |
| publishDate | 2025 |
| publishDateRange | 2025 |
| publishDateSort | 2025 |
| publisher | Wydawnictwo Uniwersytetu Łódzkiego |
| publisherStr | Wydawnictwo Uniwersytetu Łódzkiego |
| record_format | ojs |
| spelling | doab-20.500.12854ir-1553762025-03-07T14:11:13Z Chapter Is Dialetheism Where God of Religion and God of Philosophers Meet? More Questions than Answers Rybarkiewicz, Dorota The article is devoted to the question if paradoxes concerning actions and attributes of God can be solved in dialetheists’ manner. For the adherents of dialetheism theological texts where the contradictory nature of God is shown constitute the proof of their main thesis. Moreover, in one version of dialetheism the paradoxes imply that the very reality of God is inconsistent. This gives rise to the question if the classical criteria of truth apply to God. If one undermines the law of non-contradiction, the possibility to justify one’s stance is seriously reduced. In fact there are other possible causes of contradiction: equivocation, catachresis, crossing the limits of thought. As it seems, the most rational approach to inconsistency appearing in the description of God is to presume the logic that does not generate contradiction. 2025-03-07T14:11:09Z 2025-03-07T14:11:09Z 2020 chapter ONIX_20250307_9788382200355_801 9788382200355 9788382200348 https://directory.doabooks.org/handle/20.500.12854/155376 pol image/jpeg Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International https://www.press.uni.lodz.pl/index.php/wul/catalog/book/213 Wydawnictwo Uniwersytetu Łódzkiego 10.18778/8220-034-8.26 The article is devoted to the question if paradoxes concerning actions and attributes of God can be solved in dialetheists’ manner. For the adherents of dialetheism theological texts where the contradictory nature of God is shown constitute the proof of their main thesis. Moreover, in one version of dialetheism the paradoxes imply that the very reality of God is inconsistent. This gives rise to the question if the classical criteria of truth apply to God. If one undermines the law of non-contradiction, the possibility to justify one’s stance is seriously reduced. In fact there are other possible causes of contradiction: equivocation, catachresis, crossing the limits of thought. As it seems, the most rational approach to inconsistency appearing in the description of God is to presume the logic that does not generate contradiction. 10.18778/8220-034-8.26 83bfe9c9-323d-4283-b087-d859fd9af314 9788382200355 9788382200348 375-385 open access |
| spellingShingle | Rybarkiewicz, Dorota Chapter Is Dialetheism Where God of Religion and God of Philosophers Meet? More Questions than Answers |
| title | Chapter Is Dialetheism Where God of Religion and God of Philosophers Meet? More Questions than Answers |
| title_full | Chapter Is Dialetheism Where God of Religion and God of Philosophers Meet? More Questions than Answers |
| title_fullStr | Chapter Is Dialetheism Where God of Religion and God of Philosophers Meet? More Questions than Answers |
| title_full_unstemmed | Chapter Is Dialetheism Where God of Religion and God of Philosophers Meet? More Questions than Answers |
| title_short | Chapter Is Dialetheism Where God of Religion and God of Philosophers Meet? More Questions than Answers |
| title_sort | chapter is dialetheism where god of religion and god of philosophers meet more questions than answers |
| url | ONIX_20250307_9788382200355_801 |
| work_keys_str_mv | AT rybarkiewiczdorota chapterisdialetheismwheregodofreligionandgodofphilosophersmeetmorequestionsthananswers |