Chapter Dilemmas of tolerance in contemporary art

The author of the article distinguishes between „tolerance towards art” and „tolerance in art”. The former concerns the absence of individual or collective interference in creativity and the dissemination of its results. The latter refers to the renouncement of repression in the course of education,...

Ամբողջական նկարագրություն

Պահպանված է:
Մատենագիտական մանրամասներ
Հիմնական հեղինակ: Sztabiński, Grzegorz
Ձևաչափ: Online
Լեզու:լեհերեն
Հրապարակվել է: Wydawnictwo Uniwersytetu Łódzkiego 2025
Առցանց հասանելիություն:ONIX_20250307_9788382203158_998
Ցուցիչներ: Ավելացրեք ցուցիչ
Չկան պիտակներ, Եղեք առաջինը, ով նշում է այս գրառումը!
_version_ 1869517349879545856
author Sztabiński, Grzegorz
author_browse Sztabiński, Grzegorz
author_facet Sztabiński, Grzegorz
author_sort Sztabiński, Grzegorz
collection Directory of Open Access Books
description The author of the article distinguishes between „tolerance towards art” and „tolerance in art”. The former concerns the absence of individual or collective interference in creativity and the dissemination of its results. The latter refers to the renouncement of repression in the course of education, artistic activity and during the reception of performed works. While the acceptance of tolerance in the first sense can be taken for granted today, in the second case difficult choices emerge. One example is the twentieth-century avant-garde, which on the one hand fights for freedom for art and on the other – imposes various restrictions on art and its functioning. The contemporary artistic situation is characterized by democracy and pluralism. However, this is not free from dilemmas either. Some of them have been presented in more detail on the example of the concept of participatory art of Grant Kester, Nicolas Bourriaud and Claire Bishop. While the first two authors believe that the involvement of participants in artistic events should be based on dialogue and the creation of situations aimed at understanding, Bishop believes that the basis of true democracy is antagonism and therefore presupposes a clash of opposing views in art.
format Online
id doab-20.500.12854ir-155573
institution Directory of Open Access Books
language pol
publishDate 2025
publishDateRange 2025
publishDateSort 2025
publisher Wydawnictwo Uniwersytetu Łódzkiego
publisherStr Wydawnictwo Uniwersytetu Łódzkiego
record_format ojs
spelling doab-20.500.12854ir-1555732025-03-07T14:23:19Z Chapter Dilemmas of tolerance in contemporary art Sztabiński, Grzegorz The author of the article distinguishes between „tolerance towards art” and „tolerance in art”. The former concerns the absence of individual or collective interference in creativity and the dissemination of its results. The latter refers to the renouncement of repression in the course of education, artistic activity and during the reception of performed works. While the acceptance of tolerance in the first sense can be taken for granted today, in the second case difficult choices emerge. One example is the twentieth-century avant-garde, which on the one hand fights for freedom for art and on the other – imposes various restrictions on art and its functioning. The contemporary artistic situation is characterized by democracy and pluralism. However, this is not free from dilemmas either. Some of them have been presented in more detail on the example of the concept of participatory art of Grant Kester, Nicolas Bourriaud and Claire Bishop. While the first two authors believe that the involvement of participants in artistic events should be based on dialogue and the creation of situations aimed at understanding, Bishop believes that the basis of true democracy is antagonism and therefore presupposes a clash of opposing views in art. 2025-03-07T14:23:18Z 2025-03-07T14:23:18Z 2020 chapter ONIX_20250307_9788382203158_998 9788382203158 9788382203141 https://directory.doabooks.org/handle/20.500.12854/155573 pol image/jpeg Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International https://www.press.uni.lodz.pl/index.php/wul/catalog/book/1050 Wydawnictwo Uniwersytetu Łódzkiego 10.18778/8220-314-1.02 The author of the article distinguishes between „tolerance towards art” and „tolerance in art”. The former concerns the absence of individual or collective interference in creativity and the dissemination of its results. The latter refers to the renouncement of repression in the course of education, artistic activity and during the reception of performed works. While the acceptance of tolerance in the first sense can be taken for granted today, in the second case difficult choices emerge. One example is the twentieth-century avant-garde, which on the one hand fights for freedom for art and on the other – imposes various restrictions on art and its functioning. The contemporary artistic situation is characterized by democracy and pluralism. However, this is not free from dilemmas either. Some of them have been presented in more detail on the example of the concept of participatory art of Grant Kester, Nicolas Bourriaud and Claire Bishop. While the first two authors believe that the involvement of participants in artistic events should be based on dialogue and the creation of situations aimed at understanding, Bishop believes that the basis of true democracy is antagonism and therefore presupposes a clash of opposing views in art. 10.18778/8220-314-1.02 83bfe9c9-323d-4283-b087-d859fd9af314 9788382203158 9788382203141 15-31 open access
spellingShingle Sztabiński, Grzegorz
Chapter Dilemmas of tolerance in contemporary art
title Chapter Dilemmas of tolerance in contemporary art
title_full Chapter Dilemmas of tolerance in contemporary art
title_fullStr Chapter Dilemmas of tolerance in contemporary art
title_full_unstemmed Chapter Dilemmas of tolerance in contemporary art
title_short Chapter Dilemmas of tolerance in contemporary art
title_sort chapter dilemmas of tolerance in contemporary art
url ONIX_20250307_9788382203158_998
work_keys_str_mv AT sztabinskigrzegorz chapterdilemmasoftoleranceincontemporaryart