The Crucial and Contested Concept of the Endonym/Exonym Divide

Paul Woodman has called it the “great toponymic divide”, but the endonym/exonym distinction is not a concept confined solely to toponymy; it can be transferred to all name categories where the name used by insiders may differ from the name used by outsiders, for example, to ethnonyms, anthroponyms,...

全面介紹

Saved in:
書目詳細資料
主要作者: Peter, Jordan
格式: Online
語言:英语
出版: Wydawnictwo Uniwersytetu Jagiellońskiego 2025
主題:
在線閱讀:https://directory.doabooks.org/handle/20.500.12854/159801
標簽: 添加標簽
沒有標簽, 成為第一個標記此記錄!
_version_ 1869521233611063296
author Peter, Jordan
author_browse Peter, Jordan
author_facet Peter, Jordan
author_sort Peter, Jordan
collection Directory of Open Access Books
description Paul Woodman has called it the “great toponymic divide”, but the endonym/exonym distinction is not a concept confined solely to toponymy; it can be transferred to all name categories where the name used by insiders may differ from the name used by outsiders, for example, to ethnonyms, anthroponyms, names of institutions, where we frequently meet for instance nicknames and derogative designations used by outsiders. But there is no doubt that this divide has its focus on toponymy, since it corresponds there to two basic human attitudes: (1) to the distinction between ‘mine’ and ‘yours’, ‘ours’ and ‘theirs’, and (2) to territoriality, the desire to own a place, which appears at all levels of the construction of human community – from the level of the family up to that of nations. Thus, it has always a political, social, and juridical meaning and is frequently a reason for dispute and conflict. However, even after long and intensive discussions, for example, in the UNGEGN Working Group of Exonyms, to date we can still see rather divergent approaches to this divide. There is the linguistic approach regarding the endonym and the exonym rather as poles of a continuum, with various intermediate stages. Alternatively, there is the cultural-geographical approach that accepts no other criteria than the spatial relation between the name-using community and the geographical feature denoted by the name. The article elaborates on these points, mainly on the basis of the discussions and publications of the UNGEGN Working Group on Exonyms since 2002.
format Online
id doab-20.500.12854ir-159801
institution Directory of Open Access Books
language eng
publishDate 2025
publishDateRange 2025
publishDateSort 2025
publisher Wydawnictwo Uniwersytetu Jagiellońskiego
publisherStr Wydawnictwo Uniwersytetu Jagiellońskiego
record_format ojs
spelling doab-20.500.12854ir-1598012025-05-19T08:17:38Z The Crucial and Contested Concept of the Endonym/Exonym Divide Peter, Jordan exonym toponymy terminology UNGEGN cultural geography thema EDItEUR::C Language and Linguistics Paul Woodman has called it the “great toponymic divide”, but the endonym/exonym distinction is not a concept confined solely to toponymy; it can be transferred to all name categories where the name used by insiders may differ from the name used by outsiders, for example, to ethnonyms, anthroponyms, names of institutions, where we frequently meet for instance nicknames and derogative designations used by outsiders. But there is no doubt that this divide has its focus on toponymy, since it corresponds there to two basic human attitudes: (1) to the distinction between ‘mine’ and ‘yours’, ‘ours’ and ‘theirs’, and (2) to territoriality, the desire to own a place, which appears at all levels of the construction of human community – from the level of the family up to that of nations. Thus, it has always a political, social, and juridical meaning and is frequently a reason for dispute and conflict. However, even after long and intensive discussions, for example, in the UNGEGN Working Group of Exonyms, to date we can still see rather divergent approaches to this divide. There is the linguistic approach regarding the endonym and the exonym rather as poles of a continuum, with various intermediate stages. Alternatively, there is the cultural-geographical approach that accepts no other criteria than the spatial relation between the name-using community and the geographical feature denoted by the name. The article elaborates on these points, mainly on the basis of the discussions and publications of the UNGEGN Working Group on Exonyms since 2002. Published 2025-05-19T08:17:36Z 2025-05-19T08:17:36Z 2023-12-21 chapter 9788323375012 https://directory.doabooks.org/handle/20.500.12854/159801 eng image/jpeg Attribution 4.0 International https://wuj.pl/ksiazka/onomastics-in-interaction-with-other-branches-of-science-volume-1#otwarty-dostep https://wuj.pl/the-crucial-and-contested-concept-of-the-endonym-exonym-divide Wydawnictwo Uniwersytetu Jagiellońskiego Onomastics in Interaction With Other Branches of Science. Volume 1. Keynote Lectures. Toponomastics 10.4467/K7501.45/22.23.18049 10.4467/K7501.45/22.23.18049 b56389e6-bd6e-43b9-abc7-9af91c5afc6b 7de802a3-610e-4023-bb20-ff814f7c94c9 9788323375012 27-45 open access
spellingShingle exonym
toponymy
terminology
UNGEGN
cultural geography
thema EDItEUR::C Language and Linguistics
Peter, Jordan
The Crucial and Contested Concept of the Endonym/Exonym Divide
title The Crucial and Contested Concept of the Endonym/Exonym Divide
title_full The Crucial and Contested Concept of the Endonym/Exonym Divide
title_fullStr The Crucial and Contested Concept of the Endonym/Exonym Divide
title_full_unstemmed The Crucial and Contested Concept of the Endonym/Exonym Divide
title_short The Crucial and Contested Concept of the Endonym/Exonym Divide
title_sort crucial and contested concept of the endonym exonym divide
topic exonym
toponymy
terminology
UNGEGN
cultural geography
thema EDItEUR::C Language and Linguistics
topic_facet exonym
toponymy
terminology
UNGEGN
cultural geography
thema EDItEUR::C Language and Linguistics
url https://directory.doabooks.org/handle/20.500.12854/159801
work_keys_str_mv AT peterjordan thecrucialandcontestedconceptoftheendonymexonymdivide
AT peterjordan crucialandcontestedconceptoftheendonymexonymdivide