Imatge de la portada

Die Entscheidungsfindung von Richtern

The book examines cognitive biases in judicial decisions and specifically in appeal decisions. In doing so, Cara Warmuth includes methods and findings from statistics and psychology in her legal analysis. Her experimental study with 136 judges shows that appeal judges may tend to confirm the first-i...

Descripció completa

Guardat en:
Autor principal: Warmuth, Cara
Format: Online
Idioma:alemany
Publicat: Duncker & Humblot 2025
Matèries:
Bestätigungseffekt
Confirmation effect
Bestätigungstendenz
Confirmation bias
Bias
Einzelrichter
Erfolgsquote
Success rate
Gruppeneffekte
Kognitive Verzerrung
Cognitive bias
Rechtsempirie
Legal empiricism
thema EDItEUR::J Society and Social Sciences::JM Psychology::JMR Cognition and cognitive psychology
thema EDItEUR::L Law::LA Jurisprudence and general issues::LAF Systems of law::LAFD Systems of law: civil codes / civil law
thema EDItEUR::L Law::LA Jurisprudence and general issues::LAS Legal skills and practice
thema EDItEUR::L Law::LA Jurisprudence and general issues::LAT Legal profession / practice of law: general
Accés en línia:https://directory.doabooks.org/handle/20.500.12854/161073
Etiquetes: Afegir etiqueta
Sense etiquetes, Sigues el primer a etiquetar aquest registre!
Sumari:The book examines cognitive biases in judicial decisions and specifically in appeal decisions. In doing so, Cara Warmuth includes methods and findings from statistics and psychology in her legal analysis. Her experimental study with 136 judges shows that appeal judges may tend to confirm the first-instance decision in an irrational way. To avoid this appeal-specific affirmation bias, the author proposes, among other things, a preliminary blind procedure at the courts of appeal.

Ítems similars