Humanistyczna odpowiedzialność przedsiębiorstwa
The modern world expects socially responsible activities from business. The results of such activities determine the social effectiveness of business. It is expressed by the application by enterprises of principles, policies and practices related to the concept of Corporate Social Responsibility (CS...
محفوظ في:
| المؤلف الرئيسي: | |
|---|---|
| التنسيق: | Online |
| اللغة: | البولندية |
| منشور في: |
Lublin University of Technology Publishing House
2025
|
| الموضوعات: | |
| الوصول للمادة أونلاين: | https://directory.doabooks.org/handle/20.500.12854/161429 |
| الوسوم: |
لا توجد وسوم, كن أول من يضع وسما على هذه التسجيلة!
|
| الملخص: | The modern world expects socially responsible activities from business. The results of such activities determine the social effectiveness of business. It is expressed by the application by enterprises of principles, policies and practices related to the concept of Corporate Social Responsibility (CSR). CSR at the manager level, which is the subject of the analysis in this monograph, is associated with the recognition that managers have free choice in making decisions. They can use it to fulfill the company’s social obligations and achieve socially responsible results. These results depend on managers’ application of humanistic principles in human resources management. Considering the importance and topicality of issues related to the social involvement of enterprises, the aim of this study was to identify the opportunities inherent in CSR activities at the level of managerial discretion. It has been proven that managerial discretion combined with a humanistic management style leads to the development of humanistic business responsibility. To highlight the humanistic approach to business, it was compared with the economic approach. Thus, presenting the fundamental differences in their assumptions as to the essence of man, and pointing to the differences in the values recognized in both paradigms as well as the organizational cultures created within them. Management based on the economic paradigm sees the essence of man in the concept of homo economicus, which is a guarantor of the rational economy of human activities. In humanistic management, the concept of zoon politikon is applied, referring to the definition of man as a being striving for full and active participation in social life. Values characteristic of humanistic management are interpersonal and moral values, while values characteristic of economic management are intrapersonal and competence-based. Both paradigms create organizational cultures with different orientations. The perception a human being, the preferences of values, and the resulting orientations of organizational cultures influence the results of discretionary actions of managers in the sphere of CSR. These, in turn, affect social effectiveness of those organizations. The contents of this monograph link the issues of CSR with the humanistic trend in management. This monograph can be helpful in seeking answers to the question of what should be changed in the way of thinking about management to make it more economically and socially effective. The monograph indicates one of the possible ways to achieve this goal – by applying the concept of humanistic corporate responsibility implemented at the individual CSR level in managerial practice. |
|---|