Fallait-il canoniser Thérèse de Lisieux ?
Thérèse of Lisieux continues to be showered with honours, directly as a Doctor of the Church in 1997, and indirectly through the canonisation of her parents in 2015. And yet, what made her famous - the account of her life in Histoire d'une âme, a work published in 1898 the day after her death, and t...
Guardat en:
| Autors principals: | , |
|---|---|
| Format: | Online |
| Idioma: | francès |
| Publicat: |
LARHRA
2025
|
| Matèries: | |
| Accés en línia: | ONIX_20250703T162151_9791091592468_115 |
| Etiquetes: |
Sense etiquetes, Sigues el primer a etiquetar aquest registre!
|
| _version_ | 1869525313326678016 |
|---|---|
| author | Langlois, Claude Langlois, Anne |
| author_browse | Langlois, Anne Langlois, Claude |
| author_facet | Langlois, Claude Langlois, Anne |
| author_sort | Langlois, Claude |
| collection | Directory of Open Access Books |
| description | Thérèse of Lisieux continues to be showered with honours, directly as a Doctor of the Church in 1997, and indirectly through the canonisation of her parents in 2015. And yet, what made her famous - the account of her life in Histoire d'une âme, a work published in 1898 the day after her death, and the promotion from 1907 of a new spirituality (spiritual childhood) - soon came up against the objections of the Congregation of Rites. As early as 1914, Mgr Verde fulfilled his role as devil's advocate by denouncing the illegitimacy of Thérèse's testimony at her own trial. Pius X overruled him and the apostolic trial began. But in 1920 and 1921, when the examination of the virtues was still underway, there was a real revolt among the consultors, half of whom initially made their opposition known, adding to the classic objections set out by Verde and his successor Mariani, a more gendered objection, of a psychopathological nature, relating to ‘that serious and strange illness, perhaps hysteria’, to her ‘hypersensitive nervous constitution’. All the virile voluntarism that underlies the heroic virtues is thus dismissed as a ‘presumption to achieve a supernatural end by human means, and a fallacious desire to be self-sufficient in the hour of peril and temptation’. |
| format | Online |
| id | doab-20.500.12854ir-162072 |
| institution | Directory of Open Access Books |
| language | fre |
| publishDate | 2025 |
| publishDateRange | 2025 |
| publishDateSort | 2025 |
| publisher | LARHRA |
| publisherStr | LARHRA |
| record_format | ojs |
| spelling | doab-20.500.12854ir-1620722025-07-03T14:44:45Z Fallait-il canoniser Thérèse de Lisieux ? Langlois, Claude Langlois, Anne canonization Teresa of Lisieux Benedict XV Mariani (Angelo) Verde (Alessandro) modern Catholicism thema EDItEUR::N History and Archaeology::NH History::NHD European history thema EDItEUR::Q Philosophy and Religion::QR Religion and beliefs::QRA Religion: general::QRAX History of religion Thérèse of Lisieux continues to be showered with honours, directly as a Doctor of the Church in 1997, and indirectly through the canonisation of her parents in 2015. And yet, what made her famous - the account of her life in Histoire d'une âme, a work published in 1898 the day after her death, and the promotion from 1907 of a new spirituality (spiritual childhood) - soon came up against the objections of the Congregation of Rites. As early as 1914, Mgr Verde fulfilled his role as devil's advocate by denouncing the illegitimacy of Thérèse's testimony at her own trial. Pius X overruled him and the apostolic trial began. But in 1920 and 1921, when the examination of the virtues was still underway, there was a real revolt among the consultors, half of whom initially made their opposition known, adding to the classic objections set out by Verde and his successor Mariani, a more gendered objection, of a psychopathological nature, relating to ‘that serious and strange illness, perhaps hysteria’, to her ‘hypersensitive nervous constitution’. All the virile voluntarism that underlies the heroic virtues is thus dismissed as a ‘presumption to achieve a supernatural end by human means, and a fallacious desire to be self-sufficient in the hour of peril and temptation’. 2025-07-03T14:44:45Z 2025-07-03T14:44:45Z 2024 book ONIX_20250703T162151_9791091592468_115 2742-3166 9791091592468 9791091592390 https://directory.doabooks.org/handle/20.500.12854/162072 fre Chrétiens et Sociétés. Documents et Mémoires image/jpeg Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International https://www.7switch.com/fr/ebook/9791091592468/from/openedition https://books.openedition.org/larhra/12142 LARHRA 10.4000/13kvb Thérèse of Lisieux continues to be showered with honours, directly as a Doctor of the Church in 1997, and indirectly through the canonisation of her parents in 2015. And yet, what made her famous - the account of her life in Histoire d'une âme, a work published in 1898 the day after her death, and the promotion from 1907 of a new spirituality (spiritual childhood) - soon came up against the objections of the Congregation of Rites. As early as 1914, Mgr Verde fulfilled his role as devil's advocate by denouncing the illegitimacy of Thérèse's testimony at her own trial. Pius X overruled him and the apostolic trial began. But in 1920 and 1921, when the examination of the virtues was still underway, there was a real revolt among the consultors, half of whom initially made their opposition known, adding to the classic objections set out by Verde and his successor Mariani, a more gendered objection, of a psychopathological nature, relating to ‘that serious and strange illness, perhaps hysteria’, to her ‘hypersensitive nervous constitution’. All the virile voluntarism that underlies the heroic virtues is thus dismissed as a ‘presumption to achieve a supernatural end by human means, and a fallacious desire to be self-sufficient in the hour of peril and temptation’. 10.4000/13kvb d9a9f0ee-86c5-4dcd-978b-324b9b75807a 9791091592468 9791091592390 164 Lyon open access |
| spellingShingle | canonization Teresa of Lisieux Benedict XV Mariani (Angelo) Verde (Alessandro) modern Catholicism thema EDItEUR::N History and Archaeology::NH History::NHD European history thema EDItEUR::Q Philosophy and Religion::QR Religion and beliefs::QRA Religion: general::QRAX History of religion Langlois, Claude Langlois, Anne Fallait-il canoniser Thérèse de Lisieux ? |
| title | Fallait-il canoniser Thérèse de Lisieux ? |
| title_full | Fallait-il canoniser Thérèse de Lisieux ? |
| title_fullStr | Fallait-il canoniser Thérèse de Lisieux ? |
| title_full_unstemmed | Fallait-il canoniser Thérèse de Lisieux ? |
| title_short | Fallait-il canoniser Thérèse de Lisieux ? |
| title_sort | fallait il canoniser therese de lisieux |
| topic | canonization Teresa of Lisieux Benedict XV Mariani (Angelo) Verde (Alessandro) modern Catholicism thema EDItEUR::N History and Archaeology::NH History::NHD European history thema EDItEUR::Q Philosophy and Religion::QR Religion and beliefs::QRA Religion: general::QRAX History of religion |
| topic_facet | canonization Teresa of Lisieux Benedict XV Mariani (Angelo) Verde (Alessandro) modern Catholicism thema EDItEUR::N History and Archaeology::NH History::NHD European history thema EDItEUR::Q Philosophy and Religion::QR Religion and beliefs::QRA Religion: general::QRAX History of religion |
| url | ONIX_20250703T162151_9791091592468_115 |
| work_keys_str_mv | AT langloisclaude fallaitilcanonisertheresedelisieux AT langloisanne fallaitilcanonisertheresedelisieux |