Imatge de la portada

Against the Fetishisation of Plural Time

It has become an unflinching belief that time is plural and temporal multiplicity is the best framework to study the relationship between time and society. Through a critical reading of existing scholarship, Sinha questions the burgeoning fetish of plural time. Using an expanded notion of social his...

Descripció completa

Guardat en:
Autor principal: Sinha, Nitin
Format: Online
Idioma:anglès
Publicat: De Gruyter 2025
Matèries:
Social History of Time
Modern Time
Plural Temporalities
South Asia
thema EDItEUR::J Society and Social Sciences::JH Sociology and anthropology::JHB Sociology::JHBA Social theory
thema EDItEUR::J Society and Social Sciences::JH Sociology and anthropology::JHM Anthropology
thema EDItEUR::J Society and Social Sciences::JP Politics and government::JPA Political science and theory
thema EDItEUR::N History and Archaeology::NH History::NHA History: theory and methods
Accés en línia:ONIX_20250822T115951_9783111697215_18
Etiquetes: Afegir etiqueta
Sense etiquetes, Sigues el primer a etiquetar aquest registre!
Sumari:It has become an unflinching belief that time is plural and temporal multiplicity is the best framework to study the relationship between time and society. Through a critical reading of existing scholarship, Sinha questions the burgeoning fetish of plural time. Using an expanded notion of social history, the prevailing trend in the theory and practice of history is questioned by emphasizing to distinguish between time and temporality.

Ítems similars