A Structural Commentary on the So-Called Antilegomena
The structural approach facilitates exposure of the elements of eschatological teaching characteristic of 2 Peter’s author with its correct or incorrect interpretation. Narratives drawn from Jewish tradition aim to show two attitudes towards the announcement of destruction: a positive attitude, sign...
Na minha lista:
| Principais autores: | , |
|---|---|
| Formato: | Online |
| Idioma: | inglês |
| Publicado em: |
Brill
2025
|
| Assuntos: | |
| Acesso em linha: | ONIX_20251118T124429_9783666503665_17 |
| Tags: |
Sem tags, seja o primeiro a adicionar uma tag!
|
| _version_ | 1869523863507828736 |
|---|---|
| author | Wojciechowska, Kalina Rosik, Mariusz |
| author_browse | Rosik, Mariusz Wojciechowska, Kalina |
| author_facet | Wojciechowska, Kalina Rosik, Mariusz |
| author_sort | Wojciechowska, Kalina |
| collection | Directory of Open Access Books |
| description | The structural approach facilitates exposure of the elements of eschatological teaching characteristic of 2 Peter’s author with its correct or incorrect interpretation. Narratives drawn from Jewish tradition aim to show two attitudes towards the announcement of destruction: a positive attitude, signifying salvation, and a negative attitude, signifying annihilation. This pattern is transferred to the attitude towards prophetic and apostolic eschatological teaching. Part 1 of the commentary (2 Pet 1–2) focuses on the misinterpretation of this teaching by false teachers and their followers. Their eschatological scepticism is ridiculed and their grim fate described. As the starting point for this description and Peter’s whole line of argumentation 2 Pet 2:3b is taken – the thesis is that God’s inaction is only apparent, while judgment and punishment are inevitable, although only God knows when they will be executed. Part 2 of the commentary (2 Pet 3) focuses on the proper interpretation of this teaching and on laying out the principles of the letter author's hermeneutics. This hermeneutic construes texts from Jewish tradition as foreshadowing and typologies of eschatological events. In explaining the principles of his hermeneutic, the letter’s author drew on the creation story, which Jewish apocalypticism read inversely, to mark that the eschatological hermeneutics is rooted in tradition. The starting point of Peter's line of argumentation was taken to be 2 Pet 3:5.7 with its thesis of God's creative and destructive word and God's sovereign will regarding the preservation of creation and the appointment of the time of judgement. This thesis explains the apparent lack of divine action, which was also a major concern in Part 1 of the commentary (2 Pet 1–2). |
| format | Online |
| id | doab-20.500.12854ir-168884 |
| institution | Directory of Open Access Books |
| language | eng |
| publishDate | 2025 |
| publishDateRange | 2025 |
| publishDateSort | 2025 |
| publisher | Brill |
| publisherStr | Brill |
| record_format | ojs |
| spelling | doab-20.500.12854ir-1688842025-11-20T05:01:35Z A Structural Commentary on the So-Called Antilegomena Wojciechowska, Kalina Rosik, Mariusz Brief des Judas Antilegomena Neues Testament thema EDItEUR::Q Philosophy and Religion::QR Religion and beliefs::QRM Christianity::QRMF Christianity: sacred texts and revered writings::QRMF1 Bibles::QRMF13 New Testaments The structural approach facilitates exposure of the elements of eschatological teaching characteristic of 2 Peter’s author with its correct or incorrect interpretation. Narratives drawn from Jewish tradition aim to show two attitudes towards the announcement of destruction: a positive attitude, signifying salvation, and a negative attitude, signifying annihilation. This pattern is transferred to the attitude towards prophetic and apostolic eschatological teaching. Part 1 of the commentary (2 Pet 1–2) focuses on the misinterpretation of this teaching by false teachers and their followers. Their eschatological scepticism is ridiculed and their grim fate described. As the starting point for this description and Peter’s whole line of argumentation 2 Pet 2:3b is taken – the thesis is that God’s inaction is only apparent, while judgment and punishment are inevitable, although only God knows when they will be executed. Part 2 of the commentary (2 Pet 3) focuses on the proper interpretation of this teaching and on laying out the principles of the letter author's hermeneutics. This hermeneutic construes texts from Jewish tradition as foreshadowing and typologies of eschatological events. In explaining the principles of his hermeneutic, the letter’s author drew on the creation story, which Jewish apocalypticism read inversely, to mark that the eschatological hermeneutics is rooted in tradition. The starting point of Peter's line of argumentation was taken to be 2 Pet 3:5.7 with its thesis of God's creative and destructive word and God's sovereign will regarding the preservation of creation and the appointment of the time of judgement. This thesis explains the apparent lack of divine action, which was also a major concern in Part 1 of the commentary (2 Pet 1–2). 2025-11-19T05:00:39Z 2025-11-19T05:00:39Z 2025-11-18T11:49:05Z 2024 book ONIX_20251118T124429_9783666503665_17 https://library.oapen.org/handle/20.500.12657/108125 9783666503665 9783647503660 9783525503669 https://directory.doabooks.org/handle/20.500.12854/168884 eng Eastern and Central European Voices open access image/jpeg Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International https://library.oapen.org/bitstream/20.500.12657/108125/1/9783666503665.pdf Brill Vandenhoeck & Ruprecht 10.13109/9783666503665 10.13109/9783666503665 33fecb33-e7c4-4fc8-96b0-7ba2fccafba9 9783666503665 9783647503660 9783525503669 Vandenhoeck & Ruprecht 521 Göttingen open access |
| spellingShingle | Brief des Judas Antilegomena Neues Testament thema EDItEUR::Q Philosophy and Religion::QR Religion and beliefs::QRM Christianity::QRMF Christianity: sacred texts and revered writings::QRMF1 Bibles::QRMF13 New Testaments Wojciechowska, Kalina Rosik, Mariusz A Structural Commentary on the So-Called Antilegomena |
| title | A Structural Commentary on the So-Called Antilegomena |
| title_full | A Structural Commentary on the So-Called Antilegomena |
| title_fullStr | A Structural Commentary on the So-Called Antilegomena |
| title_full_unstemmed | A Structural Commentary on the So-Called Antilegomena |
| title_short | A Structural Commentary on the So-Called Antilegomena |
| title_sort | structural commentary on the so called antilegomena |
| topic | Brief des Judas Antilegomena Neues Testament thema EDItEUR::Q Philosophy and Religion::QR Religion and beliefs::QRM Christianity::QRMF Christianity: sacred texts and revered writings::QRMF1 Bibles::QRMF13 New Testaments |
| topic_facet | Brief des Judas Antilegomena Neues Testament thema EDItEUR::Q Philosophy and Religion::QR Religion and beliefs::QRM Christianity::QRMF Christianity: sacred texts and revered writings::QRMF1 Bibles::QRMF13 New Testaments |
| url | ONIX_20251118T124429_9783666503665_17 |
| work_keys_str_mv | AT wojciechowskakalina astructuralcommentaryonthesocalledantilegomena AT rosikmariusz astructuralcommentaryonthesocalledantilegomena AT wojciechowskakalina structuralcommentaryonthesocalledantilegomena AT rosikmariusz structuralcommentaryonthesocalledantilegomena |