Nominalisme et démonologie. L’imputabilité des croyances et le problème de l’hétérodoxie chez Guillaume de Manderston
In his Bipartitum in morali philosophia, the Scottish philosopher William of Manderston, a pupil of John Mair, and an Ockhamist philosopher, is quoting a text of Antonin of Padua who distinguishes the factum opened to a juridical qualification from the inner belief, known by God alone. Quoting the s...
Saved in:
| Main Author: | |
|---|---|
| Format: | Online |
| Language: | French |
| Published: |
E-theca OnLineOpenAccess Edizioni
2026
|
| Subjects: | |
| Online Access: | https://directory.doabooks.org/handle/20.500.12854/170888 |
| Tags: |
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
| _version_ | 1869521037671006208 |
|---|---|
| author | Grellard, Christophe |
| author_browse | Grellard, Christophe |
| author_facet | Grellard, Christophe |
| author_sort | Grellard, Christophe |
| collection | Directory of Open Access Books |
| description | In his Bipartitum in morali philosophia, the Scottish philosopher William of Manderston, a pupil of John Mair, and an Ockhamist philosopher, is quoting a text of Antonin of Padua who distinguishes the factum opened to a juridical qualification from the inner belief, known by God alone. Quoting the same text, the authors of the Malleus maleficarum try hard to distinguish three distinct fields, the inner beliefs which belongs to God, the exterior acts, the facts, which are relevant for the judges, and the third field, which establishes a relation between the fact and the beliefs. This third field is proper to the inquisitors. Against this ethics of imputability, Manderston, relying on Ockham’s ethics, advocates an intentionalist ethics which depends on a sharp separation between interiority and exteriority. The soteriological dimension of the question entirely belongs to the inner life, whereas the exteriority is strictly disciplinary. By his radicality, Manderston appears as a paradigm of the modern dichotomy between conscience and law, Paolo Prodi once pointed out as a cornerstone of the religious modernity. |
| format | Online |
| id | doab-20.500.12854ir-170888 |
| institution | Directory of Open Access Books |
| language | fre |
| publishDate | 2026 |
| publishDateRange | 2026 |
| publishDateSort | 2026 |
| publisher | E-theca OnLineOpenAccess Edizioni |
| publisherStr | E-theca OnLineOpenAccess Edizioni |
| record_format | ojs |
| spelling | doab-20.500.12854ir-1708882026-01-11T08:00:09Z Nominalisme et démonologie. L’imputabilité des croyances et le problème de l’hétérodoxie chez Guillaume de Manderston Grellard, Christophe intention belief imputability heresy will interiority thema EDItEUR::Q Philosophy and Religion::QD Philosophy thema EDItEUR::N History and Archaeology::NH History In his Bipartitum in morali philosophia, the Scottish philosopher William of Manderston, a pupil of John Mair, and an Ockhamist philosopher, is quoting a text of Antonin of Padua who distinguishes the factum opened to a juridical qualification from the inner belief, known by God alone. Quoting the same text, the authors of the Malleus maleficarum try hard to distinguish three distinct fields, the inner beliefs which belongs to God, the exterior acts, the facts, which are relevant for the judges, and the third field, which establishes a relation between the fact and the beliefs. This third field is proper to the inquisitors. Against this ethics of imputability, Manderston, relying on Ockham’s ethics, advocates an intentionalist ethics which depends on a sharp separation between interiority and exteriority. The soteriological dimension of the question entirely belongs to the inner life, whereas the exteriority is strictly disciplinary. By his radicality, Manderston appears as a paradigm of the modern dichotomy between conscience and law, Paolo Prodi once pointed out as a cornerstone of the religious modernity. Published 2026-01-11T08:00:07Z 2026-01-11T08:00:07Z 2019-02-01 chapter 9788875903169 https://directory.doabooks.org/handle/20.500.12854/170888 fre Quaderni di Noctua image/jpeg application/pdf Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International https://dx.doi.org/10.14640/QuadernidiNoctua5-20 https://dx.doi.org/10.14640/QuadernidiNoctua5-20 E-theca OnLineOpenAccess Edizioni Tra antichità e modernità. Studi di storia della filosofia medievale e rinascimentale E-theca OnLineOpenAccess Edizioni, Università degli Studi di Torino 10.14640/QuadernidiNoctua5-20 10.14640/QuadernidiNoctua5-20 9c743178-7a11-43f5-9c4d-07b93e99f80f e42d118a-c514-4069-8fde-e3ac87536690 9788875903169 E-theca OnLineOpenAccess Edizioni, Università degli Studi di Torino 5 776-811 Florence, Parma, Turin open access |
| spellingShingle | intention belief imputability heresy will interiority thema EDItEUR::Q Philosophy and Religion::QD Philosophy thema EDItEUR::N History and Archaeology::NH History Grellard, Christophe Nominalisme et démonologie. L’imputabilité des croyances et le problème de l’hétérodoxie chez Guillaume de Manderston |
| title | Nominalisme et démonologie. L’imputabilité des croyances et le problème de l’hétérodoxie chez Guillaume de Manderston |
| title_full | Nominalisme et démonologie. L’imputabilité des croyances et le problème de l’hétérodoxie chez Guillaume de Manderston |
| title_fullStr | Nominalisme et démonologie. L’imputabilité des croyances et le problème de l’hétérodoxie chez Guillaume de Manderston |
| title_full_unstemmed | Nominalisme et démonologie. L’imputabilité des croyances et le problème de l’hétérodoxie chez Guillaume de Manderston |
| title_short | Nominalisme et démonologie. L’imputabilité des croyances et le problème de l’hétérodoxie chez Guillaume de Manderston |
| title_sort | nominalisme et demonologie l imputabilite des croyances et le probleme de l heterodoxie chez guillaume de manderston |
| topic | intention belief imputability heresy will interiority thema EDItEUR::Q Philosophy and Religion::QD Philosophy thema EDItEUR::N History and Archaeology::NH History |
| topic_facet | intention belief imputability heresy will interiority thema EDItEUR::Q Philosophy and Religion::QD Philosophy thema EDItEUR::N History and Archaeology::NH History |
| url | https://directory.doabooks.org/handle/20.500.12854/170888 |
| work_keys_str_mv | AT grellardchristophe nominalismeetdemonologielimputabilitedescroyancesetleproblemedelheterodoxiechezguillaumedemanderston |