22: Argumentation in AI and law
This chapter investigates formal models of argumentation developed by scholars working at the nexus of AI and the law. It argues that these models successfully capture important aspects of legal reasoning. First, the chapter presents models that move beyond deduction, address defeasibility, and enga...
Պահպանված է:
| Հիմնական հեղինակ: | |
|---|---|
| Ձևաչափ: | Online |
| Լեզու: | անգլերեն |
| Հրապարակվել է: |
Edward Elgar Publishing
2026
|
| Խորագրեր: | |
| Առցանց հասանելիություն: | https://directory.doabooks.org/handle/20.500.12854/171696 |
| Ցուցիչներ: |
Չկան պիտակներ, Եղեք առաջինը, ով նշում է այս գրառումը!
|
| _version_ | 1869523595203444736 |
|---|---|
| author | Sartor, Giovanni |
| author_browse | Sartor, Giovanni |
| author_facet | Sartor, Giovanni |
| author_sort | Sartor, Giovanni |
| collection | Directory of Open Access Books |
| description | This chapter investigates formal models of argumentation developed by scholars working at the nexus of AI and the law. It argues that these models successfully capture important aspects of legal reasoning. First, the chapter presents models that move beyond deduction, address defeasibility, and engage with argumentation. Second, it introduces a formal account of legal argumentation in which the notion of an argument is defined, dialectical conflicts between arguments are analysed, priorities are considered, and a method for assessing the status of arguments and their conclusions is proposed. The method allows us to determine whether an argument is to be classified as justified, defensible, or to be rejected, relative to the conflicting arguments that are constructible from a given set of legal premises. The possibility of applying this model to different aspects of legal reasoning is discussed. |
| format | Online |
| id | doab-20.500.12854ir-171696 |
| institution | Directory of Open Access Books |
| language | eng |
| publishDate | 2026 |
| publishDateRange | 2026 |
| publishDateSort | 2026 |
| publisher | Edward Elgar Publishing |
| publisherStr | Edward Elgar Publishing |
| record_format | ojs |
| spelling | doab-20.500.12854ir-1716962026-02-12T11:41:15Z 22: Argumentation in AI and law Sartor, Giovanni AI and law; Logic; Formal argumentation; Defeasibility; Justification LAB GBC This chapter investigates formal models of argumentation developed by scholars working at the nexus of AI and the law. It argues that these models successfully capture important aspects of legal reasoning. First, the chapter presents models that move beyond deduction, address defeasibility, and engage with argumentation. Second, it introduces a formal account of legal argumentation in which the notion of an argument is defined, dialectical conflicts between arguments are analysed, priorities are considered, and a method for assessing the status of arguments and their conclusions is proposed. The method allows us to determine whether an argument is to be classified as justified, defensible, or to be rejected, relative to the conflicting arguments that are constructible from a given set of legal premises. The possibility of applying this model to different aspects of legal reasoning is discussed. Published 2026-02-12T11:41:09Z 2026-02-12T11:41:09Z 2025-12-11 chapter 9781803925431 https://directory.doabooks.org/handle/20.500.12854/171696 eng image/jpeg Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International https://www.e-elgar.com/shop/gbp/research-handbook-on-legal-argumentation-9781803925424.html https://www.elgaronline.com/edcollchap-oa/book/9781803925431/chapter22.xml Edward Elgar Publishing Edward Elgar Publishing 10.4337/9781803925431.00030 10.4337/9781803925431.00030 01ceac28-75b4-492a-8eec-f9b98bc6b28c https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ 9781803925431 Edward Elgar Publishing Cheltenham, UK open access |
| spellingShingle | AI and law; Logic; Formal argumentation; Defeasibility; Justification LAB GBC Sartor, Giovanni 22: Argumentation in AI and law |
| title | 22: Argumentation in AI and law |
| title_full | 22: Argumentation in AI and law |
| title_fullStr | 22: Argumentation in AI and law |
| title_full_unstemmed | 22: Argumentation in AI and law |
| title_short | 22: Argumentation in AI and law |
| title_sort | 22 argumentation in ai and law |
| topic | AI and law; Logic; Formal argumentation; Defeasibility; Justification LAB GBC |
| topic_facet | AI and law; Logic; Formal argumentation; Defeasibility; Justification LAB GBC |
| url | https://directory.doabooks.org/handle/20.500.12854/171696 |
| work_keys_str_mv | AT sartorgiovanni 22argumentationinaiandlaw |