Hortfunde der Spätbronze- und Früheisenzeit. Ein prozesslogischer Paradigmawechsel

Throughout his Ph.D. Thesis, José Eduardo M. de Medeiros has balanced a deeply theoretical approach with the study of concrete problems within Central European Bronze and Iron Age Archaeology. The original objective of his thesis was the investigation of Late Bronze Age jewellery hoards in France. B...

पूर्ण विवरण

में बचाया:
ग्रंथसूची विवरण
मुख्य लेखक: Eduardo M. de Medeiros, José
स्वरूप: Online
भाषा:जर्मन
प्रकाशित: Sidestone Press 2026
विषय:
ऑनलाइन पहुंच:https://library.oapen.org/handle/20.500.12657/110091
टैग: टैग जोड़ें
कोई टैग नहीं, इस रिकॉर्ड को टैग करने वाले पहले व्यक्ति बनें!
_version_ 1869531235737403392
author Eduardo M. de Medeiros, José
author_browse Eduardo M. de Medeiros, José
author_facet Eduardo M. de Medeiros, José
author_sort Eduardo M. de Medeiros, José
collection Directory of Open Access Books
description Throughout his Ph.D. Thesis, José Eduardo M. de Medeiros has balanced a deeply theoretical approach with the study of concrete problems within Central European Bronze and Iron Age Archaeology. The original objective of his thesis was the investigation of Late Bronze Age jewellery hoards in France. But an initial examination of the literature on the hoards of the Late Bronze Age and Early Iron Age led to the insight that the foundations of prehistoric interpretation required a deeper critical revision. The proposed reflection is closely linked to a sociological theory of culture that entails a critical view of how human beings explain objects and events in the world. According to this view, there is a marked revolutionary change between “pre-modern” (subject logic) and “modern” (processual logic) explanations, and it has been Medeiros’s work to understand the ramifications of this paradigm shift for archaeological investigation. Essentially, this theoretical reflection questions attempts to explain a fact through recourse to the subjective intention or plan behind the fact. Consequently, these insights lead to a relativization of the subjective intention as a tool for interpretation of archaeological remains. Such a position poses serious consequences for archaeological theories in general, and for the interpretations of the hoarding phenomenon of the Late Bronze and Early Iron Age in particular. The archaeological category of hoards is currently defined as an intentional selection of objects for unknown reasons. Nevertheless, the underlying intention is a highly-important instrument for the classification of the hoard finds as being either profane and/or ritual forms of deposition. Thus, an over reliance on the intentions behind an act clearly contrasts with the negative definition of that category. This work shows that jewellery, vessels and weapons constitute different kinds of depositions (a.k.a. hoards), and that in addition, when these depositions are viewed in the religious context of the period, jewellery and vessels carry the same importance as weapons. This is contrary to the more common view that emphasizes warriors and their weapons, which the author demonstrates to be a male bias having psychological and sociological foundations. Finally, this book offers a reconstructive approach that clarifies the cultural significance of the jewellery hoards.
format Online
id doab-20.500.12854ir-172247
institution Directory of Open Access Books
language ger
publishDate 2026
publishDateRange 2026
publishDateSort 2026
publisher Sidestone Press
publisherStr Sidestone Press
record_format ojs
spelling doab-20.500.12854ir-1722472026-02-26T05:15:56Z Hortfunde der Spätbronze- und Früheisenzeit. Ein prozesslogischer Paradigmawechsel Eduardo M. de Medeiros, José Archaeology Prehistory Votive hoards Historico-genetic theory Processual logic Jewellery hoards Late Bronze Age Early Iron Age thema EDItEUR::N History and Archaeology::NK Archaeology Throughout his Ph.D. Thesis, José Eduardo M. de Medeiros has balanced a deeply theoretical approach with the study of concrete problems within Central European Bronze and Iron Age Archaeology. The original objective of his thesis was the investigation of Late Bronze Age jewellery hoards in France. But an initial examination of the literature on the hoards of the Late Bronze Age and Early Iron Age led to the insight that the foundations of prehistoric interpretation required a deeper critical revision. The proposed reflection is closely linked to a sociological theory of culture that entails a critical view of how human beings explain objects and events in the world. According to this view, there is a marked revolutionary change between “pre-modern” (subject logic) and “modern” (processual logic) explanations, and it has been Medeiros’s work to understand the ramifications of this paradigm shift for archaeological investigation. Essentially, this theoretical reflection questions attempts to explain a fact through recourse to the subjective intention or plan behind the fact. Consequently, these insights lead to a relativization of the subjective intention as a tool for interpretation of archaeological remains. Such a position poses serious consequences for archaeological theories in general, and for the interpretations of the hoarding phenomenon of the Late Bronze and Early Iron Age in particular. The archaeological category of hoards is currently defined as an intentional selection of objects for unknown reasons. Nevertheless, the underlying intention is a highly-important instrument for the classification of the hoard finds as being either profane and/or ritual forms of deposition. Thus, an over reliance on the intentions behind an act clearly contrasts with the negative definition of that category. This work shows that jewellery, vessels and weapons constitute different kinds of depositions (a.k.a. hoards), and that in addition, when these depositions are viewed in the religious context of the period, jewellery and vessels carry the same importance as weapons. This is contrary to the more common view that emphasizes warriors and their weapons, which the author demonstrates to be a male bias having psychological and sociological foundations. Finally, this book offers a reconstructive approach that clarifies the cultural significance of the jewellery hoards. 2026-02-25T05:12:48Z 2026-02-25T05:12:48Z 2026-02-24T16:08:34Z 2021 book https://library.oapen.org/handle/20.500.12657/110091 9789464280067 9789464280074 9789464280081 https://directory.doabooks.org/handle/20.500.12854/172247 ger open access image/jpeg https://library.oapen.org/bitstream/20.500.12657/110091/1/9789464280067.pdf Sidestone Press Sidestone Press Dissertations f8b41c78-b5d0-411d-aa34-324bccd61c66 9789464280067 9789464280074 9789464280081 Sidestone Press Dissertations 210 Leiden open access
spellingShingle Archaeology
Prehistory
Votive hoards
Historico-genetic theory
Processual logic
Jewellery hoards
Late Bronze Age
Early Iron Age
thema EDItEUR::N History and Archaeology::NK Archaeology
Eduardo M. de Medeiros, José
Hortfunde der Spätbronze- und Früheisenzeit. Ein prozesslogischer Paradigmawechsel
title Hortfunde der Spätbronze- und Früheisenzeit. Ein prozesslogischer Paradigmawechsel
title_full Hortfunde der Spätbronze- und Früheisenzeit. Ein prozesslogischer Paradigmawechsel
title_fullStr Hortfunde der Spätbronze- und Früheisenzeit. Ein prozesslogischer Paradigmawechsel
title_full_unstemmed Hortfunde der Spätbronze- und Früheisenzeit. Ein prozesslogischer Paradigmawechsel
title_short Hortfunde der Spätbronze- und Früheisenzeit. Ein prozesslogischer Paradigmawechsel
title_sort hortfunde der spatbronze und fruheisenzeit ein prozesslogischer paradigmawechsel
topic Archaeology
Prehistory
Votive hoards
Historico-genetic theory
Processual logic
Jewellery hoards
Late Bronze Age
Early Iron Age
thema EDItEUR::N History and Archaeology::NK Archaeology
topic_facet Archaeology
Prehistory
Votive hoards
Historico-genetic theory
Processual logic
Jewellery hoards
Late Bronze Age
Early Iron Age
thema EDItEUR::N History and Archaeology::NK Archaeology
url https://library.oapen.org/handle/20.500.12657/110091
work_keys_str_mv AT eduardomdemedeirosjose hortfundederspatbronzeundfruheisenzeiteinprozesslogischerparadigmawechsel