Waffengleichheit im Vorverfahren
The concept of equality of arms is often used in the context of criminal proceedings but is rarely defined clearly. The present work is preparing to give the term an outline. It highlights the historical roots of this important structural principle and shows the goals of equality of arms. The work p...
Đã lưu trong:
| Tác giả chính: | |
|---|---|
| Định dạng: | Online |
| Ngôn ngữ: | Tiếng Đức |
| Được phát hành: |
Carl Grossmann Verlag
2020
|
| Những chủ đề: | |
| Truy cập trực tuyến: | 1007652 |
| Các nhãn: |
Không có thẻ, Là người đầu tiên thẻ bản ghi này!
|
| _version_ | 1869520077795098624 |
|---|---|
| author | Garland, Lorenz |
| author_browse | Garland, Lorenz |
| author_facet | Garland, Lorenz |
| author_sort | Garland, Lorenz |
| collection | Directory of Open Access Books |
| description | The concept of equality of arms is often used in the context of criminal proceedings but is rarely defined clearly. The present work is preparing to give the term an outline. It highlights the historical roots of this important structural principle and shows the goals of equality of arms. The work pays particular attention to the case law of the European Court of Human Rights (ECHR). In the decisive evidence procedure, this requires a procedural balance between the accused person on the one hand and law enforcement authorities on the other. To what extent does Swiss procedural reality - with its postponement of crucial procedural steps in the pre-litigation - meet this demand? Based on empirical data, it is shown that the institutional superiority of law enforcement agencies in the underregulated preliminary proceedings has the potential to objectively restrict the defendant's rights of defense. The author discusses how this problem can be dealt with in a holistic view of the Swiss criminal trial using various variants.
|
| format | Online |
| id | doab-20.500.12854ir-36520 |
| institution | Directory of Open Access Books |
| language | ger |
| publishDate | 2020 |
| publishDateRange | 2020 |
| publishDateSort | 2020 |
| publisher | Carl Grossmann Verlag |
| publisherStr | Carl Grossmann Verlag |
| record_format | ojs |
| spelling | doab-20.500.12854ir-365202025-03-17T07:36:33Z Waffengleichheit im Vorverfahren Garland, Lorenz Law Criminal Law Criminal Procedure Law equality of arms procedural fairness criminal proceedings criminal defence preliminary proceedings ECHR Recht Strafrecht Strafprozessordnung Waffengleichheit Verfahrensfairness Strafprozess Strafverteidigung Vorverfahren EMRK thema EDItEUR::L Law thema EDItEUR::L Law::LN Laws of specific jurisdictions and specific areas of law::LNF Criminal law: procedure and offences::LNFX Criminal procedure The concept of equality of arms is often used in the context of criminal proceedings but is rarely defined clearly. The present work is preparing to give the term an outline. It highlights the historical roots of this important structural principle and shows the goals of equality of arms. The work pays particular attention to the case law of the European Court of Human Rights (ECHR). In the decisive evidence procedure, this requires a procedural balance between the accused person on the one hand and law enforcement authorities on the other. To what extent does Swiss procedural reality - with its postponement of crucial procedural steps in the pre-litigation - meet this demand? Based on empirical data, it is shown that the institutional superiority of law enforcement agencies in the underregulated preliminary proceedings has the potential to objectively restrict the defendant's rights of defense. The author discusses how this problem can be dealt with in a holistic view of the Swiss criminal trial using various variants. Der Begriff der Waffengleichheit wird im Kontext des Strafverfahrens häufig verwendet aber nur selten trennscharf definiert. Die vorliegende Arbeit schickt sich an, dem Begriff eine inhaltliche Kontur zu verleihen. Sie beleuchtet die historischen Wurzeln dieses wichtigen Strukturprinzips und zeigt die Ziele der Waffengleichheit auf. Ein besonderes Augenmerk richtet das Werk auf die Rechtsprechung des Europäischen Gerichtshofs für Menschenrechte (EGMR). Dieser verlangt im entscheidenden Beweisverfahren nach einer Verfahrensbalance zwischen beschuldigter Person auf der einen und Strafverfolgungsbehörden auf der anderen Seite. Inwieweit hält die Schweizer Verfahrenswirklichkeit – mit ihrer Verschiebung entscheidender Verfahrensschritte ins Vorverfahren – dieser Forderung stand? Auf Grundlage empirischer Daten wird aufgezeigt, dass die institutionelle Übermacht der Strafverfolgungsbehörden im unterregulierten Vorverfahren das Potenzial birgt, die Verteidigungsrechte der beschuldigten Person in unsachlicher Weise einzuschränken. Wie diesem Problem begegnet werden kann, diskutiert der Autor in einer gesamthaften Betrachtung des schweizerischen Strafprozesses anhand verschiedener Varianten. 2020-02-11 11:41:53 2020-04-01T06:51:52Z 2019 book 1007652 OCN: 1147265875 http://library.oapen.org/handle/20.500.12657/22504 https://directory.doabooks.org/handle/20.500.12854/36520 ger sui generis open access image/jpeg image/jpeg image/jpeg image/jpeg n/a n/a n/a n/a https://library.oapen.org/bitstream/20.500.12657/22504/1/CG_9783941159341_ebook.pdf https://library.oapen.org/bitstream/20.500.12657/22504/1/CG_9783941159341_ebook.pdf https://library.oapen.org/bitstream/20.500.12657/22504/1/CG_9783941159341_ebook.pdf https://library.oapen.org/bitstream/20.500.12657/22504/1/CG_9783941159341_ebook.pdf Carl Grossmann Verlag 10.24921/2019.94115935 10.24921/2019.94115935 1038e10e-6d2e-4ebe-b7ca-28573e6a41d0 Schweizerischer Nationalfonds zur Förderung der Wissenschaftlichen Forschung Swiss National Science Foundation (SNF) 365 Berlin; Bern open access |
| spellingShingle | Law Criminal Law Criminal Procedure Law equality of arms procedural fairness criminal proceedings criminal defence preliminary proceedings ECHR Recht Strafrecht Strafprozessordnung Waffengleichheit Verfahrensfairness Strafprozess Strafverteidigung Vorverfahren EMRK thema EDItEUR::L Law thema EDItEUR::L Law::LN Laws of specific jurisdictions and specific areas of law::LNF Criminal law: procedure and offences::LNFX Criminal procedure Garland, Lorenz Waffengleichheit im Vorverfahren |
| title | Waffengleichheit im Vorverfahren |
| title_full | Waffengleichheit im Vorverfahren |
| title_fullStr | Waffengleichheit im Vorverfahren |
| title_full_unstemmed | Waffengleichheit im Vorverfahren |
| title_short | Waffengleichheit im Vorverfahren |
| title_sort | waffengleichheit im vorverfahren |
| topic | Law Criminal Law Criminal Procedure Law equality of arms procedural fairness criminal proceedings criminal defence preliminary proceedings ECHR Recht Strafrecht Strafprozessordnung Waffengleichheit Verfahrensfairness Strafprozess Strafverteidigung Vorverfahren EMRK thema EDItEUR::L Law thema EDItEUR::L Law::LN Laws of specific jurisdictions and specific areas of law::LNF Criminal law: procedure and offences::LNFX Criminal procedure |
| topic_facet | Law Criminal Law Criminal Procedure Law equality of arms procedural fairness criminal proceedings criminal defence preliminary proceedings ECHR Recht Strafrecht Strafprozessordnung Waffengleichheit Verfahrensfairness Strafprozess Strafverteidigung Vorverfahren EMRK thema EDItEUR::L Law thema EDItEUR::L Law::LN Laws of specific jurisdictions and specific areas of law::LNF Criminal law: procedure and offences::LNFX Criminal procedure |
| url | 1007652 |
| work_keys_str_mv | AT garlandlorenz waffengleichheitimvorverfahren |