Arqueologias de Império

This Portuguese contribution to the debate on the concept of “Empire” brings together 17 essays covering various areas and periods across Antiquity. Biblical sources allow us to structure various categories and organize their related meanings as valuable paths to inform our understating of the idea...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Delfim F. Leão, José Augusto M. Ramos, Nuno Simões Rodrigues
Format: Online
Language:Portuguese
Published: Coimbra University Press 2021
Subjects:
Online Access:32341
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
_version_ 1869524954520748032
author Delfim F. Leão
José Augusto M. Ramos
Nuno Simões Rodrigues
author_browse Delfim F. Leão
José Augusto M. Ramos
Nuno Simões Rodrigues
author_facet Delfim F. Leão
José Augusto M. Ramos
Nuno Simões Rodrigues
author_sort Delfim F. Leão
collection Directory of Open Access Books
description This Portuguese contribution to the debate on the concept of “Empire” brings together 17 essays covering various areas and periods across Antiquity. Biblical sources allow us to structure various categories and organize their related meanings as valuable paths to inform our understating of the idea of “Empire”. Egypt first serves as the opportunity to inquire the usefulness of “Empire” as a concept within the larger discussion of periodization in History, as well as the scope and limitations of its definitions, as the observed political dissolution in the Late New Kingdom shows. Regarding Ancient “Mesopotamian Empires”, the first “Empire” is usually attributed to the political formulas brought forth by the dynasty of Akkad, which emerged before the hegemony of Babylon. The underlying ideology to Hammurabi’s social and military policies through two crucial moments in Babylonian History provides the ground to analyze the emergence of its first hegemony: the war with Elam and the expedition to the Kingdom of Larsa. Approaches to the Anatolian and the Phoenician/Syrian-Palestinian territories follow a methodology focused on myth and religious narratives and the traces of political realities found there, as well as a reflection on the validity of “imperialism” when applied to the Phoenician colonial world. Later Mesopotamian imperial formulas are analyzed within the context of violence, military and ritual: on Jeremias and the rationale for a heavenly justified submission of Judah to the so-called “Neo-Babylonian Empire”; on Nabonidus, the last king of this dynasty; and on the diverging behavior of both Nabonidus and Cyrus to the cult of Marduk. Herodotus, a privileged source for the classical perception of eastern formulas, displays the Persian Empire as the background for different Greek political proposals at play (famously in 3.80-82), and informs us of the queenship and the queens of Ancient Persia. Moreover, the role and status of women in Hellenistic societies is further examined, most notably in its relations to power. The last four essays propose a conceptual genealogy for the idea of imperium through the Roman World: from the representation Ancient Historiography creates of the processes structuring Roman “imperialism” and their agents; the interpretation Suetonius proposes of imperial power and how it ought to be used; to the validity of a certain notion of “globalization” applied to the Late Roman expanse.
format Online
id doab-20.500.12854ir-41288
institution Directory of Open Access Books
language por
publishDate 2021
publishDateRange 2021
publishDateSort 2021
publisher Coimbra University Press
publisherStr Coimbra University Press
record_format ojs
spelling doab-20.500.12854ir-412882024-03-25T18:27:38Z Arqueologias de Império Delfim F. Leão José Augusto M. Ramos Nuno Simões Rodrigues D1-2009 Portuguese thema EDItEUR::D Biography, Literature and Literary studies::D Biography, Literature and Literary studies::DN Biography and non-fiction prose This Portuguese contribution to the debate on the concept of “Empire” brings together 17 essays covering various areas and periods across Antiquity. Biblical sources allow us to structure various categories and organize their related meanings as valuable paths to inform our understating of the idea of “Empire”. Egypt first serves as the opportunity to inquire the usefulness of “Empire” as a concept within the larger discussion of periodization in History, as well as the scope and limitations of its definitions, as the observed political dissolution in the Late New Kingdom shows. Regarding Ancient “Mesopotamian Empires”, the first “Empire” is usually attributed to the political formulas brought forth by the dynasty of Akkad, which emerged before the hegemony of Babylon. The underlying ideology to Hammurabi’s social and military policies through two crucial moments in Babylonian History provides the ground to analyze the emergence of its first hegemony: the war with Elam and the expedition to the Kingdom of Larsa. Approaches to the Anatolian and the Phoenician/Syrian-Palestinian territories follow a methodology focused on myth and religious narratives and the traces of political realities found there, as well as a reflection on the validity of “imperialism” when applied to the Phoenician colonial world. Later Mesopotamian imperial formulas are analyzed within the context of violence, military and ritual: on Jeremias and the rationale for a heavenly justified submission of Judah to the so-called “Neo-Babylonian Empire”; on Nabonidus, the last king of this dynasty; and on the diverging behavior of both Nabonidus and Cyrus to the cult of Marduk. Herodotus, a privileged source for the classical perception of eastern formulas, displays the Persian Empire as the background for different Greek political proposals at play (famously in 3.80-82), and informs us of the queenship and the queens of Ancient Persia. Moreover, the role and status of women in Hellenistic societies is further examined, most notably in its relations to power. The last four essays propose a conceptual genealogy for the idea of imperium through the Roman World: from the representation Ancient Historiography creates of the processes structuring Roman “imperialism” and their agents; the interpretation Suetonius proposes of imperial power and how it ought to be used; to the validity of a certain notion of “globalization” applied to the Late Roman expanse. 2021-02-11T08:29:02Z 2021-02-11T08:29:02Z 2019-03-01 00:21:09 2018 book 32341 21828814 9789892616254 https://directory.doabooks.org/handle/20.500.12854/41288 por Classica Digitalia: Humanitas Supplementum - Estudos Monográficos image/jpeg Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International https://doi.org/10.14195/978-989-26-1626-1 Coimbra University Press 10.14195/978-989-26-1626-1 10.14195/978-989-26-1626-1 71c193a7-6c08-4e85-ae72-a002208589fd 9789892616254 382 open access
spellingShingle D1-2009
Portuguese
thema EDItEUR::D Biography, Literature and Literary studies::D Biography, Literature and Literary studies::DN Biography and non-fiction prose
Delfim F. Leão
José Augusto M. Ramos
Nuno Simões Rodrigues
Arqueologias de Império
title Arqueologias de Império
title_full Arqueologias de Império
title_fullStr Arqueologias de Império
title_full_unstemmed Arqueologias de Império
title_short Arqueologias de Império
title_sort arqueologias de imperio
topic D1-2009
Portuguese
thema EDItEUR::D Biography, Literature and Literary studies::D Biography, Literature and Literary studies::DN Biography and non-fiction prose
topic_facet D1-2009
Portuguese
thema EDItEUR::D Biography, Literature and Literary studies::D Biography, Literature and Literary studies::DN Biography and non-fiction prose
url 32341
work_keys_str_mv AT delfimfleao arqueologiasdeimperio
AT joseaugustomramos arqueologiasdeimperio
AT nunosimoesrodrigues arqueologiasdeimperio