Assessing Prenatal and Neonatal Gonadal Steroid Exposure for Studies of Human Development: Methodological and Theoretical Challenges

There is extensive evidence from animal models that gonadal steroids, produced in fetal and neonatal life, act on the developing organism to produce sex differences far beyond the reproductive system. That early gonadal steroid exposure also plays an important role in human development is supported...

תיאור מלא

שמור ב:
מידע ביבליוגרפי
Main Authors: Rebecca Christine Knickmeyer, Bonnie Auyeung, Marsha L. Davenport
פורמט: Online
שפה:אנגלית
יצא לאור: Frontiers Media SA 2021
נושאים:
גישה מקוונת:19515
תגים: הוספת תג
אין תגיות, היה/י הראשונ/ה לתייג את הרשומה!
_version_ 1869517762222620672
author Rebecca Christine Knickmeyer
Bonnie Auyeung
Marsha L. Davenport
author_browse Bonnie Auyeung
Marsha L. Davenport
Rebecca Christine Knickmeyer
author_facet Rebecca Christine Knickmeyer
Bonnie Auyeung
Marsha L. Davenport
author_sort Rebecca Christine Knickmeyer
collection Directory of Open Access Books
description There is extensive evidence from animal models that gonadal steroids, produced in fetal and neonatal life, act on the developing organism to produce sex differences far beyond the reproductive system. That early gonadal steroid exposure also plays an important role in human development is supported by studies of individuals with disorders of sex determination and differentiation. It is much less clear whether normal variation in gonadal steroid exposure predicts sexually dimorphic health outcomes or within-sex variation. This is largely due to challenges related to the assessment of gonadal steroid exposure in the developing fetus and neonate. Regarding the prenatal period, serial measurements of serum hormone levels in the fetus, for use in studies of later development, are not possible for ethical reasons. Researchers have measured hormones in maternal blood, umbilical cord blood, and amniotic fluid; used putative anthropometric indices such as the relative lengths of the 2nd and 4th digits (2D:4D); evaluated common variants in genes related to hormone production, transport, and metabolism; and examined development in opposite sex twins and the offspring of mothers with hyperandrogeny. Each of these approaches has particular strengths and notable weaknesses. Regarding the neonatal period, serial measurements in serum are often impractical for studies of typical development. Salivary hormone assays, frequently used in studies of older children and adults, have not been extensively investigated in neonates. The most appropriate timing for testing is also open to debate. Early work suggested that testosterone levels in males begin to rise after the first postnatal week, peak around the 3rd to 4th months of life, and then drop back to very low levels by 1 year. However a more recent study of 138 infants did not demonstrate this pattern. Testosterone was highest on the day of birth and gradually dropped over the first 6 months. Even less is known about patterns of early estrogen exposure, though highly sensitive bioassays indicated that sex differences are present in early childhood. In addition, the design and interpretation of studies may be impacted by widespread acceptance of conceptual frameworks that are not well-supported empirically. For example, many researchers presume that the free hormone hypothesis, which states that unbound hormone is more readily diffusible into tissues and thus a better measure of actual exposure, is true. However this hypothesis has been challenged on multiple grounds. A second example: it is generally accepted that masculinization of the human brain is primarily mediated by the androgen receptor (in contrast to rodents where the estrogen receptor plays a major role), in part because chromosomal males with complete androgen insensitivity generally espouse a female gender identity. However this is not always the case, and other sexually dimorphic outcomes have not been carefully assessed in CAIS. The aim of this research topic is to gather together experimental and review papers which address the diverse challenges in assessing prenatal and neonatal gonadal steroid exposure for studies of human development with the expectation that this will allow more critical appraisal of existing studies, identify critical research gaps, and improve the design of future studies.
format Online
id doab-20.500.12854ir-41442
institution Directory of Open Access Books
language eng
publishDate 2021
publishDateRange 2021
publishDateSort 2021
publisher Frontiers Media SA
publisherStr Frontiers Media SA
record_format ojs
spelling doab-20.500.12854ir-414422024-03-30T23:22:11Z Assessing Prenatal and Neonatal Gonadal Steroid Exposure for Studies of Human Development: Methodological and Theoretical Challenges Rebecca Christine Knickmeyer Bonnie Auyeung Marsha L. Davenport R5-920 RC648-665 minipuberty Testosterone androgen receptor digit ratio prenatal sexual differentiation umbilical cord blood Opposite-sex twins Saliva Hypogonadism thema EDItEUR::M Medicine and Nursing There is extensive evidence from animal models that gonadal steroids, produced in fetal and neonatal life, act on the developing organism to produce sex differences far beyond the reproductive system. That early gonadal steroid exposure also plays an important role in human development is supported by studies of individuals with disorders of sex determination and differentiation. It is much less clear whether normal variation in gonadal steroid exposure predicts sexually dimorphic health outcomes or within-sex variation. This is largely due to challenges related to the assessment of gonadal steroid exposure in the developing fetus and neonate. Regarding the prenatal period, serial measurements of serum hormone levels in the fetus, for use in studies of later development, are not possible for ethical reasons. Researchers have measured hormones in maternal blood, umbilical cord blood, and amniotic fluid; used putative anthropometric indices such as the relative lengths of the 2nd and 4th digits (2D:4D); evaluated common variants in genes related to hormone production, transport, and metabolism; and examined development in opposite sex twins and the offspring of mothers with hyperandrogeny. Each of these approaches has particular strengths and notable weaknesses. Regarding the neonatal period, serial measurements in serum are often impractical for studies of typical development. Salivary hormone assays, frequently used in studies of older children and adults, have not been extensively investigated in neonates. The most appropriate timing for testing is also open to debate. Early work suggested that testosterone levels in males begin to rise after the first postnatal week, peak around the 3rd to 4th months of life, and then drop back to very low levels by 1 year. However a more recent study of 138 infants did not demonstrate this pattern. Testosterone was highest on the day of birth and gradually dropped over the first 6 months. Even less is known about patterns of early estrogen exposure, though highly sensitive bioassays indicated that sex differences are present in early childhood. In addition, the design and interpretation of studies may be impacted by widespread acceptance of conceptual frameworks that are not well-supported empirically. For example, many researchers presume that the free hormone hypothesis, which states that unbound hormone is more readily diffusible into tissues and thus a better measure of actual exposure, is true. However this hypothesis has been challenged on multiple grounds. A second example: it is generally accepted that masculinization of the human brain is primarily mediated by the androgen receptor (in contrast to rodents where the estrogen receptor plays a major role), in part because chromosomal males with complete androgen insensitivity generally espouse a female gender identity. However this is not always the case, and other sexually dimorphic outcomes have not been carefully assessed in CAIS. The aim of this research topic is to gather together experimental and review papers which address the diverse challenges in assessing prenatal and neonatal gonadal steroid exposure for studies of human development with the expectation that this will allow more critical appraisal of existing studies, identify critical research gaps, and improve the design of future studies. 2021-02-11T08:35:18Z 2021-02-11T08:35:18Z 2016-08-16 10:34:25 2015 book 19515 16648714 9782889196074 https://directory.doabooks.org/handle/20.500.12854/41442 eng Frontiers Research Topics image/jpeg Attribution 4.0 International http://www.frontiersin.org/books/Assessing_Prenatal_and_Neonatal_Gonadal_Steroid_Exposure_for_Studies_of_Human_Development_Methodolo/658#nogo http://journal.frontiersin.org/researchtopic/1389/assessing-prenatal-and-neonatal-gonadal-steroid-exposure-for-studies-of-human-development-methodolog Frontiers Media SA 10.3389/978-2-88919-607-4 10.3389/978-2-88919-607-4 bf5ce210-e72e-4860-ba9b-c305640ff3ae 9782889196074 80 open access
spellingShingle R5-920
RC648-665
minipuberty
Testosterone
androgen receptor
digit ratio
prenatal
sexual differentiation
umbilical cord blood
Opposite-sex twins
Saliva
Hypogonadism
thema EDItEUR::M Medicine and Nursing
Rebecca Christine Knickmeyer
Bonnie Auyeung
Marsha L. Davenport
Assessing Prenatal and Neonatal Gonadal Steroid Exposure for Studies of Human Development: Methodological and Theoretical Challenges
title Assessing Prenatal and Neonatal Gonadal Steroid Exposure for Studies of Human Development: Methodological and Theoretical Challenges
title_full Assessing Prenatal and Neonatal Gonadal Steroid Exposure for Studies of Human Development: Methodological and Theoretical Challenges
title_fullStr Assessing Prenatal and Neonatal Gonadal Steroid Exposure for Studies of Human Development: Methodological and Theoretical Challenges
title_full_unstemmed Assessing Prenatal and Neonatal Gonadal Steroid Exposure for Studies of Human Development: Methodological and Theoretical Challenges
title_short Assessing Prenatal and Neonatal Gonadal Steroid Exposure for Studies of Human Development: Methodological and Theoretical Challenges
title_sort assessing prenatal and neonatal gonadal steroid exposure for studies of human development methodological and theoretical challenges
topic R5-920
RC648-665
minipuberty
Testosterone
androgen receptor
digit ratio
prenatal
sexual differentiation
umbilical cord blood
Opposite-sex twins
Saliva
Hypogonadism
thema EDItEUR::M Medicine and Nursing
topic_facet R5-920
RC648-665
minipuberty
Testosterone
androgen receptor
digit ratio
prenatal
sexual differentiation
umbilical cord blood
Opposite-sex twins
Saliva
Hypogonadism
thema EDItEUR::M Medicine and Nursing
url 19515
work_keys_str_mv AT rebeccachristineknickmeyer assessingprenatalandneonatalgonadalsteroidexposureforstudiesofhumandevelopmentmethodologicalandtheoreticalchallenges
AT bonnieauyeung assessingprenatalandneonatalgonadalsteroidexposureforstudiesofhumandevelopmentmethodologicalandtheoreticalchallenges
AT marshaldavenport assessingprenatalandneonatalgonadalsteroidexposureforstudiesofhumandevelopmentmethodologicalandtheoreticalchallenges