The Reasoning Brain: The Interplay between Cognitive Neuroscience and Theories of Reasoning

Despite the centrality of rationality to our identity as a species (let alone the scientific endeavour), and the fact that it has been studied for several millennia, the present state of our knowledge of the mechanisms underlying logical reasoning remains highly fragmented. For example, a recent rev...

Volledige beschrijving

Bewaard in:
Bibliografische gegevens
Hoofdauteurs: Vinod Goel, Gorka Navarrete, Jerome Prado, Ira A. Noveck
Formaat: Online
Taal:Engels
Gepubliceerd in: Frontiers Media SA 2021
Onderwerpen:
Online toegang:22969
Tags: Voeg label toe
Geen labels, Wees de eerste die dit record labelt!
_version_ 1869514486220587008
author Vinod Goel
Gorka Navarrete
Jerome Prado
Ira A. Noveck
author_browse Gorka Navarrete
Ira A. Noveck
Jerome Prado
Vinod Goel
author_facet Vinod Goel
Gorka Navarrete
Jerome Prado
Ira A. Noveck
author_sort Vinod Goel
collection Directory of Open Access Books
description Despite the centrality of rationality to our identity as a species (let alone the scientific endeavour), and the fact that it has been studied for several millennia, the present state of our knowledge of the mechanisms underlying logical reasoning remains highly fragmented. For example, a recent review concluded that none of the extant (12!) theories provide an adequate account (Khemlani & Johnson- Laird, 2011), while other authors argue that we are on the brink of a paradigm change, where the old binary logic framework will be washed away and replaced by more modern (and correct) probabilistic and Bayesian approaches (see for example Elqayam & Over, 2012; Oaksford & Chater, 2009; Over, 2009). Over the past 15 years neuroscience brain imaging techniques and patient studies have been used to map out the functional neuroanatomy of reasoning processes. The aim of this research topic is to discuss whether this line of research has facilitated, hindered, or has been largely irrelevant for understanding of reasoning processes. The answer is neither obvious nor uncontroversial. We would like to engage both the cognitive and the neuroscience community in this discussion. Some of the questions of interest are: How have the data generated by the patient and neuroimaging studies: • influenced our thinking about modularity of deductive reasoning • impacted the debate between mental logic theory, mental model theory and the dual mechanism accounts • affected our thinking about dual mechanism theories • informed discussion of the relationship between induction and deduction • illuminated the relationship between language, visual spatial processing and reasoning • affected our thinking about the unity of deductive reasoning processes Have any of the cognitive theories of reasoning helped us explain deficits in certain patient populations? Do certain theories do a better job of this than others? Is there any value to localizing cognitive processes and identifying dissociations (for reasoning and other cognitive processes)? What challenges have neuroimaging data raised for cognitive theories of reasoning? How can cognitive theory inform interpretation of patient data or neuroimaging data? How can patient data or neuroimaging data best inform cognitive theory? This list of questions is not exhaustive. Manuscripts addressing other related questions are welcome. We are interested in hearing from skeptics, agnostics and believers, and welcome original research contributions as well as reviews, methods, hypothesis & theory papers that contribute to the discussion of the current state of our knowledge of how neuroscience is (or is not) helping us to deepen our understanding of the mechanisms underlying logical reasoning processes.
format Online
id doab-20.500.12854ir-57702
institution Directory of Open Access Books
language eng
publishDate 2021
publishDateRange 2021
publishDateSort 2021
publisher Frontiers Media SA
publisherStr Frontiers Media SA
record_format ojs
spelling doab-20.500.12854ir-577022024-04-05T12:35:23Z The Reasoning Brain: The Interplay between Cognitive Neuroscience and Theories of Reasoning Vinod Goel Gorka Navarrete Jerome Prado Ira A. Noveck RC321-571 Q1-390 Brain inference lesions reasoning Thinking Dual mechanisms Reason Emotions fMRI induction deduction logic rationality Neuropsychology thema EDItEUR::P Mathematics and Science::PS Biology, life sciences::PSA Life sciences: general issues::PSAN Neurosciences Despite the centrality of rationality to our identity as a species (let alone the scientific endeavour), and the fact that it has been studied for several millennia, the present state of our knowledge of the mechanisms underlying logical reasoning remains highly fragmented. For example, a recent review concluded that none of the extant (12!) theories provide an adequate account (Khemlani & Johnson- Laird, 2011), while other authors argue that we are on the brink of a paradigm change, where the old binary logic framework will be washed away and replaced by more modern (and correct) probabilistic and Bayesian approaches (see for example Elqayam & Over, 2012; Oaksford & Chater, 2009; Over, 2009). Over the past 15 years neuroscience brain imaging techniques and patient studies have been used to map out the functional neuroanatomy of reasoning processes. The aim of this research topic is to discuss whether this line of research has facilitated, hindered, or has been largely irrelevant for understanding of reasoning processes. The answer is neither obvious nor uncontroversial. We would like to engage both the cognitive and the neuroscience community in this discussion. Some of the questions of interest are: How have the data generated by the patient and neuroimaging studies: • influenced our thinking about modularity of deductive reasoning • impacted the debate between mental logic theory, mental model theory and the dual mechanism accounts • affected our thinking about dual mechanism theories • informed discussion of the relationship between induction and deduction • illuminated the relationship between language, visual spatial processing and reasoning • affected our thinking about the unity of deductive reasoning processes Have any of the cognitive theories of reasoning helped us explain deficits in certain patient populations? Do certain theories do a better job of this than others? Is there any value to localizing cognitive processes and identifying dissociations (for reasoning and other cognitive processes)? What challenges have neuroimaging data raised for cognitive theories of reasoning? How can cognitive theory inform interpretation of patient data or neuroimaging data? How can patient data or neuroimaging data best inform cognitive theory? This list of questions is not exhaustive. Manuscripts addressing other related questions are welcome. We are interested in hearing from skeptics, agnostics and believers, and welcome original research contributions as well as reviews, methods, hypothesis & theory papers that contribute to the discussion of the current state of our knowledge of how neuroscience is (or is not) helping us to deepen our understanding of the mechanisms underlying logical reasoning processes. 2021-02-12T00:57:03Z 2021-02-12T00:57:03Z 2017-07-06 13:27:36 2017 book 22969 16648714 9782889451180 https://directory.doabooks.org/handle/20.500.12854/57702 eng Frontiers Research Topics image/jpeg Attribution 4.0 International http://www.frontiersin.org/books/The_Reasoning_Brain_The_Interplay_between_Cognitive_Neuroscience_and_Theories_of_Reasoning/1160#nogo http://journal.frontiersin.org/researchtopic/2000/the-reasoning-brain-the-interplay-between-cognitive-neuroscience-and-theories-of-reasoning Frontiers Media SA 10.3389/978-2-88945-118-0 10.3389/978-2-88945-118-0 bf5ce210-e72e-4860-ba9b-c305640ff3ae 9782889451180 178 open access
spellingShingle RC321-571
Q1-390
Brain
inference
lesions
reasoning
Thinking
Dual mechanisms
Reason
Emotions
fMRI
induction
deduction
logic
rationality
Neuropsychology
thema EDItEUR::P Mathematics and Science::PS Biology, life sciences::PSA Life sciences: general issues::PSAN Neurosciences
Vinod Goel
Gorka Navarrete
Jerome Prado
Ira A. Noveck
The Reasoning Brain: The Interplay between Cognitive Neuroscience and Theories of Reasoning
title The Reasoning Brain: The Interplay between Cognitive Neuroscience and Theories of Reasoning
title_full The Reasoning Brain: The Interplay between Cognitive Neuroscience and Theories of Reasoning
title_fullStr The Reasoning Brain: The Interplay between Cognitive Neuroscience and Theories of Reasoning
title_full_unstemmed The Reasoning Brain: The Interplay between Cognitive Neuroscience and Theories of Reasoning
title_short The Reasoning Brain: The Interplay between Cognitive Neuroscience and Theories of Reasoning
title_sort reasoning brain the interplay between cognitive neuroscience and theories of reasoning
topic RC321-571
Q1-390
Brain
inference
lesions
reasoning
Thinking
Dual mechanisms
Reason
Emotions
fMRI
induction
deduction
logic
rationality
Neuropsychology
thema EDItEUR::P Mathematics and Science::PS Biology, life sciences::PSA Life sciences: general issues::PSAN Neurosciences
topic_facet RC321-571
Q1-390
Brain
inference
lesions
reasoning
Thinking
Dual mechanisms
Reason
Emotions
fMRI
induction
deduction
logic
rationality
Neuropsychology
thema EDItEUR::P Mathematics and Science::PS Biology, life sciences::PSA Life sciences: general issues::PSAN Neurosciences
url 22969
work_keys_str_mv AT vinodgoel thereasoningbraintheinterplaybetweencognitiveneuroscienceandtheoriesofreasoning
AT gorkanavarrete thereasoningbraintheinterplaybetweencognitiveneuroscienceandtheoriesofreasoning
AT jeromeprado thereasoningbraintheinterplaybetweencognitiveneuroscienceandtheoriesofreasoning
AT iraanoveck thereasoningbraintheinterplaybetweencognitiveneuroscienceandtheoriesofreasoning
AT vinodgoel reasoningbraintheinterplaybetweencognitiveneuroscienceandtheoriesofreasoning
AT gorkanavarrete reasoningbraintheinterplaybetweencognitiveneuroscienceandtheoriesofreasoning
AT jeromeprado reasoningbraintheinterplaybetweencognitiveneuroscienceandtheoriesofreasoning
AT iraanoveck reasoningbraintheinterplaybetweencognitiveneuroscienceandtheoriesofreasoning