Spatial and non-spatial aspects of neglect

Neglect is one of the most impressive neuropsychological disorder, for both its theoretical and clinical relevance. Besides being very common and disabling, it is highly informative for understanding normal cognitive functioning. The hallmark of neglect is the failure to attend to the contralesional...

Deskribapen osoa

Gorde:
Xehetasun bibliografikoak
Egile Nagusiak: Carlo Umilta, Mario Bonato, Marco Zorzi, Konstantinos Priftis
Formatua: Online
Hizkuntza:ingelesa
Argitaratua: Frontiers Media SA 2021
Gaiak:
Sarrera elektronikoa:18695
Etiketak: Etiketa erantsi
Etiketarik gabe, Izan zaitez lehena erregistro honi etiketa jartzen!
_version_ 1869528432085303296
author Carlo Umilta
Mario Bonato
Marco Zorzi
Konstantinos Priftis
author_browse Carlo Umilta
Konstantinos Priftis
Marco Zorzi
Mario Bonato
author_facet Carlo Umilta
Mario Bonato
Marco Zorzi
Konstantinos Priftis
author_sort Carlo Umilta
collection Directory of Open Access Books
description Neglect is one of the most impressive neuropsychological disorder, for both its theoretical and clinical relevance. Besides being very common and disabling, it is highly informative for understanding normal cognitive functioning. The hallmark of neglect is the failure to attend to the contralesional hemispace. However, several studies have recently highlighted that additional deficits, not attributable to a spatial bias, are associated to the impaired contralesional hemispace processing. Moreover, manifestations of neglect tend to be particularly heterogeneous and often dissociate according to the spatial domain being investigated (e.g., body space, space within reaching, space beyond reaching, imaginal space). Heterogeneity in neglect patients also means that dissociations across different tasks in a single patient are more the rule than the exception. Evidence suggests that some of these dissociations can be readily explained by taking into account the amount of available attentional resources as a major determinant for the presence and the severity of neglect. There is no doubt that neglect patients provide a wealth of information about the functioning of systems subserving attentional orienting and spatial processing. Moreover, their performance also show that some non-spatial deficits are tightly coupled with more classic contralesional spatial deficits. It seems however still unclear to what extent these non-spatial deficits are an intrinsic characteristic of neglect or whether they are to be considered unspecific effects of the often massive brain lesions suffered by the patients. From the clinical point of view, neglect is a disorder that dramatically affects patients and their caregivers, because it severely limits the individuals’ autonomy and motor recovery after brain damage. For these reasons neglect is a disorder that is worth rehabilitating. To be effective, neglect rehabilitation should be based on the knowledge of what cognitive aspects are impaired and it should be focused on improving daily-life performance. For these reasons, it is also important to detect and quantify subtle forms of neglect.
format Online
id doab-20.500.12854ir-59792
institution Directory of Open Access Books
language eng
publishDate 2021
publishDateRange 2021
publishDateSort 2021
publisher Frontiers Media SA
publisherStr Frontiers Media SA
record_format ojs
spelling doab-20.500.12854ir-597922024-04-05T17:29:57Z Spatial and non-spatial aspects of neglect Carlo Umilta Mario Bonato Marco Zorzi Konstantinos Priftis RC321-571 Q1-390 peripersonal space spatial attention Stroke Awareness non spatial attention spatial cognition Personal Space brain damage cognitive impairments neglect thema EDItEUR::P Mathematics and Science::PS Biology, life sciences::PSA Life sciences: general issues::PSAN Neurosciences Neglect is one of the most impressive neuropsychological disorder, for both its theoretical and clinical relevance. Besides being very common and disabling, it is highly informative for understanding normal cognitive functioning. The hallmark of neglect is the failure to attend to the contralesional hemispace. However, several studies have recently highlighted that additional deficits, not attributable to a spatial bias, are associated to the impaired contralesional hemispace processing. Moreover, manifestations of neglect tend to be particularly heterogeneous and often dissociate according to the spatial domain being investigated (e.g., body space, space within reaching, space beyond reaching, imaginal space). Heterogeneity in neglect patients also means that dissociations across different tasks in a single patient are more the rule than the exception. Evidence suggests that some of these dissociations can be readily explained by taking into account the amount of available attentional resources as a major determinant for the presence and the severity of neglect. There is no doubt that neglect patients provide a wealth of information about the functioning of systems subserving attentional orienting and spatial processing. Moreover, their performance also show that some non-spatial deficits are tightly coupled with more classic contralesional spatial deficits. It seems however still unclear to what extent these non-spatial deficits are an intrinsic characteristic of neglect or whether they are to be considered unspecific effects of the often massive brain lesions suffered by the patients. From the clinical point of view, neglect is a disorder that dramatically affects patients and their caregivers, because it severely limits the individuals’ autonomy and motor recovery after brain damage. For these reasons neglect is a disorder that is worth rehabilitating. To be effective, neglect rehabilitation should be based on the knowledge of what cognitive aspects are impaired and it should be focused on improving daily-life performance. For these reasons, it is also important to detect and quantify subtle forms of neglect. 2021-02-12T04:13:04Z 2021-02-12T04:13:04Z 2016-03-10 08:14:32 2015 book 18695 16648714 9782889195848 https://directory.doabooks.org/handle/20.500.12854/59792 eng Frontiers Research Topics image/jpeg Attribution 4.0 International http://www.frontiersin.org/books/Spatial_and_non-spatial_aspects_of_neglect/630#nogo http://journal.frontiersin.org/researchtopic/501/spatial-and-non-spatial-aspects-of-neglect Frontiers Media SA 10.3389/978-2-88919-584-8 10.3389/978-2-88919-584-8 bf5ce210-e72e-4860-ba9b-c305640ff3ae 9782889195848 151 open access
spellingShingle RC321-571
Q1-390
peripersonal space
spatial attention
Stroke
Awareness
non spatial attention
spatial cognition
Personal Space
brain damage
cognitive impairments
neglect
thema EDItEUR::P Mathematics and Science::PS Biology, life sciences::PSA Life sciences: general issues::PSAN Neurosciences
Carlo Umilta
Mario Bonato
Marco Zorzi
Konstantinos Priftis
Spatial and non-spatial aspects of neglect
title Spatial and non-spatial aspects of neglect
title_full Spatial and non-spatial aspects of neglect
title_fullStr Spatial and non-spatial aspects of neglect
title_full_unstemmed Spatial and non-spatial aspects of neglect
title_short Spatial and non-spatial aspects of neglect
title_sort spatial and non spatial aspects of neglect
topic RC321-571
Q1-390
peripersonal space
spatial attention
Stroke
Awareness
non spatial attention
spatial cognition
Personal Space
brain damage
cognitive impairments
neglect
thema EDItEUR::P Mathematics and Science::PS Biology, life sciences::PSA Life sciences: general issues::PSAN Neurosciences
topic_facet RC321-571
Q1-390
peripersonal space
spatial attention
Stroke
Awareness
non spatial attention
spatial cognition
Personal Space
brain damage
cognitive impairments
neglect
thema EDItEUR::P Mathematics and Science::PS Biology, life sciences::PSA Life sciences: general issues::PSAN Neurosciences
url 18695
work_keys_str_mv AT carloumilta spatialandnonspatialaspectsofneglect
AT mariobonato spatialandnonspatialaspectsofneglect
AT marcozorzi spatialandnonspatialaspectsofneglect
AT konstantinospriftis spatialandnonspatialaspectsofneglect