Using neurophysiological signals that reflect cognitive or affective state

What can we learn from spontaneously occurring brain and other physiological signals about an individual’s cognitive and affective state and how can we make use of this information? One line of research that is actively involved with this question is Passive Brain-Computer-Interfaces (BCI). To date...

Cur síos iomlán

Sábháilte in:
Sonraí bibleagrafaíochta
Príomhchruthaitheoirí: Anne-Marie Brouwer, Thorsten O. Zander, Jan B. F. van Erp
Formáid: Online
Teanga:Béarla
Foilsithe / Cruthaithe: Frontiers Media SA 2021
Ábhair:
Rochtain ar líne:19521
Clibeanna: Cuir clib leis
Níl clibeanna ann, Bí ar an gcéad duine le clib a chur leis an taifead seo!
_version_ 1869517807252668416
author Anne-Marie Brouwer
Thorsten O. Zander
Jan B. F. van Erp
author_browse Anne-Marie Brouwer
Jan B. F. van Erp
Thorsten O. Zander
author_facet Anne-Marie Brouwer
Thorsten O. Zander
Jan B. F. van Erp
author_sort Anne-Marie Brouwer
collection Directory of Open Access Books
description What can we learn from spontaneously occurring brain and other physiological signals about an individual’s cognitive and affective state and how can we make use of this information? One line of research that is actively involved with this question is Passive Brain-Computer-Interfaces (BCI). To date most BCIs are aimed at assisting patients for whom brain signals could form an alternative output channel as opposed to more common human output channels, like speech and moving the hands. However, brain signals (possibly in combination with other physiological signals) also form an output channel above and beyond the more usual ones: they can potentially provide continuous, online information about an individual’s cognitive and affective state without the need of conscious or effortful communication. The provided information could be used in a number of ways. Examples include monitoring cognitive workload through EEG and skin conductance for adaptive automation or using ERPs in response to errors to correct for a behavioral response. While Passive BCIs make use of online (neuro)physiological responses and close the interaction cycle between a user and a computer system, (neuro)physiological responses can also be used in an offline fashion. Examples of this include detecting amygdala responses for neuromarketing, and measuring EEG and pupil dilation as indicators of mental effort for optimizing information systems. The described field of applied (neuro)physiology can strongly benefit from high quality scientific studies that control for confounding factors and use proper comparison conditions. Another area of relevance is ethics, ranging from dubious product claims, acceptance of the technology by the general public, privacy of users, to possible effects that these kinds of applications may have on society as a whole. In this Research Topic we aimed to publish studies of the highest scientific quality that are directed towards applications that utilize spontaneously, effortlessly generated neurophysiological signals (brain and/or other physiological signals) reflecting cognitive or affective state. We especially welcomed studies that describe specific real world applications demonstrating a significant benefit compared to standard applications. We also invited original, new kinds of (proposed) applications in this area as well as comprehensive review articles that point out what is and what is not possible (according to scientific standards) in this field. Finally, we welcomed manuscripts on the ethical issues that are involved. Connected to the Research Topic was a workshop (held on June 6, during the Fifth International Brain-Computer Interface Meeting, June 3-7, 2013, Asilomar, California) that brought together a diverse group of people who were working in this field. We discussed the state of the art and formulated major challenges, as reflected in the first paper of the Research Topic.
format Online
id doab-20.500.12854ir-61794
institution Directory of Open Access Books
language eng
publishDate 2021
publishDateRange 2021
publishDateSort 2021
publisher Frontiers Media SA
publisherStr Frontiers Media SA
record_format ojs
spelling doab-20.500.12854ir-617942024-04-05T12:35:49Z Using neurophysiological signals that reflect cognitive or affective state Anne-Marie Brouwer Thorsten O. Zander Jan B. F. van Erp RC321-571 Q1-390 Brain-computer interface cognitive state EEG affective state physiological computing mental state applied neuroscience Psychophysiology neuroergonomics Neurophysiology thema EDItEUR::P Mathematics and Science::PS Biology, life sciences::PSA Life sciences: general issues::PSAN Neurosciences What can we learn from spontaneously occurring brain and other physiological signals about an individual’s cognitive and affective state and how can we make use of this information? One line of research that is actively involved with this question is Passive Brain-Computer-Interfaces (BCI). To date most BCIs are aimed at assisting patients for whom brain signals could form an alternative output channel as opposed to more common human output channels, like speech and moving the hands. However, brain signals (possibly in combination with other physiological signals) also form an output channel above and beyond the more usual ones: they can potentially provide continuous, online information about an individual’s cognitive and affective state without the need of conscious or effortful communication. The provided information could be used in a number of ways. Examples include monitoring cognitive workload through EEG and skin conductance for adaptive automation or using ERPs in response to errors to correct for a behavioral response. While Passive BCIs make use of online (neuro)physiological responses and close the interaction cycle between a user and a computer system, (neuro)physiological responses can also be used in an offline fashion. Examples of this include detecting amygdala responses for neuromarketing, and measuring EEG and pupil dilation as indicators of mental effort for optimizing information systems. The described field of applied (neuro)physiology can strongly benefit from high quality scientific studies that control for confounding factors and use proper comparison conditions. Another area of relevance is ethics, ranging from dubious product claims, acceptance of the technology by the general public, privacy of users, to possible effects that these kinds of applications may have on society as a whole. In this Research Topic we aimed to publish studies of the highest scientific quality that are directed towards applications that utilize spontaneously, effortlessly generated neurophysiological signals (brain and/or other physiological signals) reflecting cognitive or affective state. We especially welcomed studies that describe specific real world applications demonstrating a significant benefit compared to standard applications. We also invited original, new kinds of (proposed) applications in this area as well as comprehensive review articles that point out what is and what is not possible (according to scientific standards) in this field. Finally, we welcomed manuscripts on the ethical issues that are involved. Connected to the Research Topic was a workshop (held on June 6, during the Fifth International Brain-Computer Interface Meeting, June 3-7, 2013, Asilomar, California) that brought together a diverse group of people who were working in this field. We discussed the state of the art and formulated major challenges, as reflected in the first paper of the Research Topic. 2021-02-12T07:16:09Z 2021-02-12T07:16:09Z 2016-08-16 10:34:25 2015 book 19521 16648714 9782889196135 https://directory.doabooks.org/handle/20.500.12854/61794 eng Frontiers Research Topics image/jpeg Attribution 4.0 International http://www.frontiersin.org/books/Using_Neurophysiological_Signals_that_Reflect_Cognitive_or_Affective_State/656 http://journal.frontiersin.org/researchtopic/1528/using-neurophysiological-signals-that-reflect-cognitive-or-affective-state Frontiers Media SA 10.3389/978-2-88919-613-5 10.3389/978-2-88919-613-5 bf5ce210-e72e-4860-ba9b-c305640ff3ae 9782889196135 314 open access
spellingShingle RC321-571
Q1-390
Brain-computer interface
cognitive state
EEG
affective state
physiological computing
mental state
applied neuroscience
Psychophysiology
neuroergonomics
Neurophysiology
thema EDItEUR::P Mathematics and Science::PS Biology, life sciences::PSA Life sciences: general issues::PSAN Neurosciences
Anne-Marie Brouwer
Thorsten O. Zander
Jan B. F. van Erp
Using neurophysiological signals that reflect cognitive or affective state
title Using neurophysiological signals that reflect cognitive or affective state
title_full Using neurophysiological signals that reflect cognitive or affective state
title_fullStr Using neurophysiological signals that reflect cognitive or affective state
title_full_unstemmed Using neurophysiological signals that reflect cognitive or affective state
title_short Using neurophysiological signals that reflect cognitive or affective state
title_sort using neurophysiological signals that reflect cognitive or affective state
topic RC321-571
Q1-390
Brain-computer interface
cognitive state
EEG
affective state
physiological computing
mental state
applied neuroscience
Psychophysiology
neuroergonomics
Neurophysiology
thema EDItEUR::P Mathematics and Science::PS Biology, life sciences::PSA Life sciences: general issues::PSAN Neurosciences
topic_facet RC321-571
Q1-390
Brain-computer interface
cognitive state
EEG
affective state
physiological computing
mental state
applied neuroscience
Psychophysiology
neuroergonomics
Neurophysiology
thema EDItEUR::P Mathematics and Science::PS Biology, life sciences::PSA Life sciences: general issues::PSAN Neurosciences
url 19521
work_keys_str_mv AT annemariebrouwer usingneurophysiologicalsignalsthatreflectcognitiveoraffectivestate
AT thorstenozander usingneurophysiologicalsignalsthatreflectcognitiveoraffectivestate
AT janbfvanerp usingneurophysiologicalsignalsthatreflectcognitiveoraffectivestate