European Consensus between Strategy and Principle
This study offers a critical account of the reasoning employed by the European Court of Human Rights, particularly its references to European consensus. Based on an in-depth analysis of the Court’s case-law against the backdrop of human rights theory, it will be of interest to both practitioners and...
Сохранить в:
| Главный автор: | |
|---|---|
| Формат: | Online |
| Язык: | английский |
| Опубликовано: |
Nomos Verlagsgesellschaft mbH & Co. KG
2021
|
| Предметы: | |
| Online-ссылка: | https://directory.doabooks.org/handle/20.500.12854/64536 |
| Метки: |
Нет меток, Требуется 1-ая метка записи!
|
| _version_ | 1869527710675501056 |
|---|---|
| author | Theilen, Jens T. |
| author_browse | Theilen, Jens T. |
| author_facet | Theilen, Jens T. |
| author_sort | Theilen, Jens T. |
| collection | Directory of Open Access Books |
| description | This study offers a critical account of the reasoning employed by the European Court of Human Rights, particularly its references to European consensus. Based on an in-depth analysis of the Court’s case-law against the backdrop of human rights theory, it will be of interest to both practitioners and theorists.
While European consensus is often understood as providing an objective benchmark within the Court’s reasoning, this study argues to the contrary that it forms part of the very structures of argument that render human rights law indeterminate. It suggests that foregrounding consensus and the Court’s legitimacy serves to entrench the status quo and puts forward novel ways of approaching human rights to enable social transformation. |
| format | Online |
| id | doab-20.500.12854ir-64536 |
| institution | Directory of Open Access Books |
| language | eng |
| publishDate | 2021 |
| publishDateRange | 2021 |
| publishDateSort | 2021 |
| publisher | Nomos Verlagsgesellschaft mbH & Co. KG |
| publisherStr | Nomos Verlagsgesellschaft mbH & Co. KG |
| record_format | ojs |
| spelling | doab-20.500.12854ir-645362022-01-31T10:52:46Z European Consensus between Strategy and Principle Theilen, Jens T. critical international legal theory legitimacy margin of appreciation European consensus European Court of Human Rights comparative legal reasoning LBBR 1QFE This study offers a critical account of the reasoning employed by the European Court of Human Rights, particularly its references to European consensus. Based on an in-depth analysis of the Court’s case-law against the backdrop of human rights theory, it will be of interest to both practitioners and theorists. While European consensus is often understood as providing an objective benchmark within the Court’s reasoning, this study argues to the contrary that it forms part of the very structures of argument that render human rights law indeterminate. It suggests that foregrounding consensus and the Court’s legitimacy serves to entrench the status quo and puts forward novel ways of approaching human rights to enable social transformation. Published Dieses Werk analysiert die Argumentationsstrukturen des Europäischen Gerichtshofs für Menschenrechte, insbesondere dessen Verweise auf einen Europäischen Konsensus. Es verbindet kritische Menschenrechtstheorie mit einer eingehenden Analyse der Rechtsprechung des Gerichtshofs. Während der Europäische Konsensus oft als objektives Element innerhalb der Argumentation des Gerichtshofs angesehen wird, legt diese Studie dar, dass er Teil der argumentativer Strukturen bildet, die zur Unbestimmtheit von Menschenrechten führen. Konsensus und die Legitimität des Gerichtshofs zu betonen, dient der Verankerung des Status Quo. Der Autor schlägt alternative Ansätze vor, um Menschenrechte als Instrument sozialer Transformation denken zu können. 2021-04-09T09:52:20Z 2021-04-09T09:52:20Z 2021-04-01 book 978-3-8487-8091-4 978-3-7489-2509-5 https://directory.doabooks.org/handle/20.500.12854/64536 eng Beiträge zum ausländischen öffentlichen Recht und Völkerrecht, image/jpeg Attribution 4.0 International https://www.nomos-shop.de/nomos/titel/european-consensus-between-strategy-and-principle-id-98979/ https://doi.org/10.5771/9783748925095 Nomos Verlagsgesellschaft mbH & Co. KG 10.5771/9783748925095 Dieses Werk analysiert die Argumentationsstrukturen des Europäischen Gerichtshofs für Menschenrechte, insbesondere dessen Verweise auf einen Europäischen Konsensus. Es verbindet kritische Menschenrechtstheorie mit einer eingehenden Analyse der Rechtsprechung des Gerichtshofs. Während der Europäische Konsensus oft als objektives Element innerhalb der Argumentation des Gerichtshofs angesehen wird, legt diese Studie dar, dass er Teil der argumentativer Strukturen bildet, die zur Unbestimmtheit von Menschenrechten führen. Konsensus und die Legitimität des Gerichtshofs zu betonen, dient der Verankerung des Status Quo. Der Autor schlägt alternative Ansätze vor, um Menschenrechte als Instrument sozialer Transformation denken zu können. 10.5771/9783748925095 20c8b06d-3b2b-4af2-acda-fbcfdfea5744 7d48738a-6759-43c9-974a-c93e736baeb1 978-3-8487-8091-4 978-3-7489-2509-5 Max Planck Society (MPG) 497 Baden-Baden Max Planck Society (MPG) MPG 04a0tr310 open access |
| spellingShingle | critical international legal theory legitimacy margin of appreciation European consensus European Court of Human Rights comparative legal reasoning LBBR 1QFE Theilen, Jens T. European Consensus between Strategy and Principle |
| title | European Consensus between Strategy and Principle |
| title_full | European Consensus between Strategy and Principle |
| title_fullStr | European Consensus between Strategy and Principle |
| title_full_unstemmed | European Consensus between Strategy and Principle |
| title_short | European Consensus between Strategy and Principle |
| title_sort | european consensus between strategy and principle |
| topic | critical international legal theory legitimacy margin of appreciation European consensus European Court of Human Rights comparative legal reasoning LBBR 1QFE |
| topic_facet | critical international legal theory legitimacy margin of appreciation European consensus European Court of Human Rights comparative legal reasoning LBBR 1QFE |
| url | https://directory.doabooks.org/handle/20.500.12854/64536 |
| work_keys_str_mv | AT theilenjenst europeanconsensusbetweenstrategyandprinciple |