Chapter 4 Consequentialism and the Law in Medicine

There are two broad schools of ethical theory: consequentialism and non-consequentialism. According to consequentialism, the right act is that act which has the best consequences. According to non-consequentialism, the rightness of an action is not solely determined by its consequences. (Though,...

Volledige beschrijving

Bewaard in:
Bibliografische gegevens
Hoofdauteurs: Savulescu, Julian, Wilkinson, Dominic
Formaat: Online
Taal:Engels
Gepubliceerd in: Oxford University Press 2021
Onderwerpen:
Online toegang:https://library.oapen.org/handle/20.500.12657/48385
Tags: Voeg label toe
Geen labels, Wees de eerste die dit record labelt!
_version_ 1869519298696839168
author Savulescu, Julian
Wilkinson, Dominic
author_browse Savulescu, Julian
Wilkinson, Dominic
author_facet Savulescu, Julian
Wilkinson, Dominic
author_sort Savulescu, Julian
collection Directory of Open Access Books
description There are two broad schools of ethical theory: consequentialism and non-consequentialism. According to consequentialism, the right act is that act which has the best consequences. According to non-consequentialism, the rightness of an action is not solely determined by its consequences. (Though, most versions of non-consequentialism allow some ethical relevance of consequences). The most famous version of non-consequentialism is deontology, which holds that one has an absolute duty to obey certain rules. “Never kill an innocent person” or “never lie” are examples of such rules. Christianity is one form of deontology and the Ten Commandments represent one set of rules. Medical law exists at the intersection between consequentialism and deontology. Much of medical law is consequentialist in nature. However, having evolved from a set of Christian values and principles, it retains certain deontological characteristics. In particular, it retains a commitment in many jurisdictions to the Sanctity of Life Doctrine, though this is being shed or modified as assisted dying becomes legalised. In this chapter, we will begin by defining consequentialism, and contrasting it with deontology. We will describe some examples of the influence of consequentialism over current medical law. We will close by outlining the areas where consequentialism is at odds with current medical law and how medical law should evolve according to consequentialism.
format Online
id doab-20.500.12854ir-68190
institution Directory of Open Access Books
language eng
publishDate 2021
publishDateRange 2021
publishDateSort 2021
publisher Oxford University Press
publisherStr Oxford University Press
record_format ojs
spelling doab-20.500.12854ir-681902025-01-24T09:37:48Z Chapter 4 Consequentialism and the Law in Medicine Savulescu, Julian Wilkinson, Dominic consequentialism; medical law thema EDItEUR::L Law thema EDItEUR::M Medicine and Nursing There are two broad schools of ethical theory: consequentialism and non-consequentialism. According to consequentialism, the right act is that act which has the best consequences. According to non-consequentialism, the rightness of an action is not solely determined by its consequences. (Though, most versions of non-consequentialism allow some ethical relevance of consequences). The most famous version of non-consequentialism is deontology, which holds that one has an absolute duty to obey certain rules. “Never kill an innocent person” or “never lie” are examples of such rules. Christianity is one form of deontology and the Ten Commandments represent one set of rules. Medical law exists at the intersection between consequentialism and deontology. Much of medical law is consequentialist in nature. However, having evolved from a set of Christian values and principles, it retains certain deontological characteristics. In particular, it retains a commitment in many jurisdictions to the Sanctity of Life Doctrine, though this is being shed or modified as assisted dying becomes legalised. In this chapter, we will begin by defining consequentialism, and contrasting it with deontology. We will describe some examples of the influence of consequentialism over current medical law. We will close by outlining the areas where consequentialism is at odds with current medical law and how medical law should evolve according to consequentialism. 2021-04-27T02:03:20Z 2021-04-27T02:03:20Z 2021-04-26T11:25:43Z 2019 chapter https://library.oapen.org/handle/20.500.12657/48385 https://directory.doabooks.org/handle/20.500.12854/68190 eng open access image/jpeg image/jpeg Attribution 4.0 International Attribution 4.0 International https://library.oapen.org/bitstream/20.500.12657/48385/1/Bookshelf_NBK550266.pdf https://library.oapen.org/bitstream/20.500.12657/48385/1/Bookshelf_NBK550266.pdf Oxford University Press db4e319f-ca9f-449a-bcf2-37d7c6f885b1 Philosophical Foundations of Medical Law Wellcome Trust d859fbd3-d884-4090-a0ec-baf821c9abfd Wellcome 18 Oxford open access
spellingShingle consequentialism; medical law
thema EDItEUR::L Law
thema EDItEUR::M Medicine and Nursing
Savulescu, Julian
Wilkinson, Dominic
Chapter 4 Consequentialism and the Law in Medicine
title Chapter 4 Consequentialism and the Law in Medicine
title_full Chapter 4 Consequentialism and the Law in Medicine
title_fullStr Chapter 4 Consequentialism and the Law in Medicine
title_full_unstemmed Chapter 4 Consequentialism and the Law in Medicine
title_short Chapter 4 Consequentialism and the Law in Medicine
title_sort chapter 4 consequentialism and the law in medicine
topic consequentialism; medical law
thema EDItEUR::L Law
thema EDItEUR::M Medicine and Nursing
topic_facet consequentialism; medical law
thema EDItEUR::L Law
thema EDItEUR::M Medicine and Nursing
url https://library.oapen.org/handle/20.500.12657/48385
work_keys_str_mv AT savulescujulian chapter4consequentialismandthelawinmedicine
AT wilkinsondominic chapter4consequentialismandthelawinmedicine