Semantische Spezialisierung vs. Polysemie
Transitive verbs can often leave their arguments implicit. Until now, the objectless variants of these verbs have been frequently associated with specific meanings. This volume demonstrates that most verbs have different interpretations with different valency frames and specific conditions for omiss...
שמור ב:
| מחבר ראשי: | |
|---|---|
| פורמט: | Online |
| שפה: | גרמנית |
| יצא לאור: |
De Gruyter
2021
|
| נושאים: | |
| גישה מקוונת: | ONIX_20210520_9783110726268_39 |
| תגים: |
אין תגיות, היה/י הראשונ/ה לתייג את הרשומה!
|
| _version_ | 1869520012070354944 |
|---|---|
| author | von der Becke, Tanja |
| author_browse | von der Becke, Tanja |
| author_facet | von der Becke, Tanja |
| author_sort | von der Becke, Tanja |
| collection | Directory of Open Access Books |
| description | Transitive verbs can often leave their arguments implicit. Until now, the objectless variants of these verbs have been frequently associated with specific meanings. This volume demonstrates that most verbs have different interpretations with different valency frames and specific conditions for omission. Accordingly, statements about omission and their semantic consequences must be applied to the interpretations of a verb. |
| format | Online |
| id | doab-20.500.12854ir-69862 |
| institution | Directory of Open Access Books |
| language | ger |
| publishDate | 2021 |
| publishDateRange | 2021 |
| publishDateSort | 2021 |
| publisher | De Gruyter |
| publisherStr | De Gruyter |
| record_format | ojs |
| spelling | doab-20.500.12854ir-698622024-03-24T11:38:16Z Semantische Spezialisierung vs. Polysemie von der Becke, Tanja Argument omission polysemy verb valency thema EDItEUR::C Language and Linguistics::CF Linguistics Transitive verbs can often leave their arguments implicit. Until now, the objectless variants of these verbs have been frequently associated with specific meanings. This volume demonstrates that most verbs have different interpretations with different valency frames and specific conditions for omission. Accordingly, statements about omission and their semantic consequences must be applied to the interpretations of a verb. 2021-05-20T15:25:50Z 2021-05-20T15:25:50Z 2021 book ONIX_20210520_9783110726268_39 1612-8702 9783110726268 9783110726374 9783110726831 https://directory.doabooks.org/handle/20.500.12854/69862 ger Linguistik – Impulse & Tendenzen image/jpeg Attribution 4.0 International https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110726268 https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110726268 De Gruyter 10.1515/9783110726268 Transitive verbs can often leave their arguments implicit. Until now, the objectless variants of these verbs have been frequently associated with specific meanings. This volume demonstrates that most verbs have different interpretations with different valency frames and specific conditions for omission. Accordingly, statements about omission and their semantic consequences must be applied to the interpretations of a verb. 10.1515/9783110726268 af2fbfcc-ee87-43d8-a035-afb9d7eef6a5 9783110726268 9783110726374 9783110726831 91 366 open access |
| spellingShingle | Argument omission polysemy verb valency thema EDItEUR::C Language and Linguistics::CF Linguistics von der Becke, Tanja Semantische Spezialisierung vs. Polysemie |
| title | Semantische Spezialisierung vs. Polysemie |
| title_full | Semantische Spezialisierung vs. Polysemie |
| title_fullStr | Semantische Spezialisierung vs. Polysemie |
| title_full_unstemmed | Semantische Spezialisierung vs. Polysemie |
| title_short | Semantische Spezialisierung vs. Polysemie |
| title_sort | semantische spezialisierung vs polysemie |
| topic | Argument omission polysemy verb valency thema EDItEUR::C Language and Linguistics::CF Linguistics |
| topic_facet | Argument omission polysemy verb valency thema EDItEUR::C Language and Linguistics::CF Linguistics |
| url | ONIX_20210520_9783110726268_39 |
| work_keys_str_mv | AT vonderbecketanja semantischespezialisierungvspolysemie |