Chapter Naturalizing Neuroethics? A Syncretic Approach

Neuroethics is uniquely situated to socially interpret what brain sciences are learning about social and moral cognition while helping society hold neuroscientific research and neurotechnological applications to firm moral standards. Both tasks, if they are to be pursued successfully, must find ways...

Descrición completa

Gardado en:
Detalles Bibliográficos
Main Authors: Shook, John R., Giordano, James
Formato: Online
Idioma:inglés
Publicado: InTechOpen 2021
Subjects:
Acceso en liña:ONIX_20210602_10.5772/intechopen.81829_429
Tags: Engadir etiqueta
Sen Etiquetas, Sexa o primeiro en etiquetar este rexistro!
_version_ 1869527823282077696
author Shook, John R.
Giordano, James
author_browse Giordano, James
Shook, John R.
author_facet Shook, John R.
Giordano, James
author_sort Shook, John R.
collection Directory of Open Access Books
description Neuroethics is uniquely situated to socially interpret what brain sciences are learning about social and moral cognition while helping society hold neuroscientific research and neurotechnological applications to firm moral standards. Both tasks, if they are to be pursued successfully, must find ways to closely relate the “neuro” with the “ethical.” Keeping them apart has been the objective of nonnaturalist worldviews worried about scientism and reductionism, and now they complain about “neuroessentialism” and similar labels for dissolutions of agency and responsibility into mere brain activity. A nonnaturalistic neuroethics, on whatever metaphysical basis, insists that the biology of brains could not explain moral decisions or ground moral norms. We agree on that much, since the methodology of brain sciences presumes, and cannot replace, behavioral and psychological attributions of moral capacity and conduct. But the social and the neurological are always related through the anthropological; and that common basis is, not coincidentally, also where the ethical is grounded, as humanity upholds persons as bearers of moral worth and moral capacity. Neuroethics, by focusing on persons, need never resort to nonnaturalism to uphold what ultimately matters for ethics, and “naturalizing” neuroethics is also unnecessary for a humanity-centered neurobioethics.
format Online
id doab-20.500.12854ir-70265
institution Directory of Open Access Books
language eng
publishDate 2021
publishDateRange 2021
publishDateSort 2021
publisher InTechOpen
publisherStr InTechOpen
record_format ojs
spelling doab-20.500.12854ir-702652025-01-15T14:18:23Z Chapter Naturalizing Neuroethics? A Syncretic Approach Shook, John R. Giordano, James neuroethics, neurobioethics, naturalism, nonnaturalism, neuroscience, psychology, ethics thema EDItEUR::P Mathematics and Science::PS Biology, life sciences::PSA Life sciences: general issues::PSAN Neurosciences Neuroethics is uniquely situated to socially interpret what brain sciences are learning about social and moral cognition while helping society hold neuroscientific research and neurotechnological applications to firm moral standards. Both tasks, if they are to be pursued successfully, must find ways to closely relate the “neuro” with the “ethical.” Keeping them apart has been the objective of nonnaturalist worldviews worried about scientism and reductionism, and now they complain about “neuroessentialism” and similar labels for dissolutions of agency and responsibility into mere brain activity. A nonnaturalistic neuroethics, on whatever metaphysical basis, insists that the biology of brains could not explain moral decisions or ground moral norms. We agree on that much, since the methodology of brain sciences presumes, and cannot replace, behavioral and psychological attributions of moral capacity and conduct. But the social and the neurological are always related through the anthropological; and that common basis is, not coincidentally, also where the ethical is grounded, as humanity upholds persons as bearers of moral worth and moral capacity. Neuroethics, by focusing on persons, need never resort to nonnaturalism to uphold what ultimately matters for ethics, and “naturalizing” neuroethics is also unnecessary for a humanity-centered neurobioethics. 2021-02-10T12:58:18Z 2021-06-02T10:12:01Z 2019 chapter ONIX_20210602_10.5772/intechopen.81829_429 https://library.oapen.org/handle/20.500.12657/49315 https://directory.doabooks.org/handle/20.500.12854/70265 eng open access image/jpeg image/jpeg image/jpeg n/a n/a n/a https://library.oapen.org/bitstream/20.500.12657/49315/1/64245.pdf https://library.oapen.org/bitstream/20.500.12657/49315/1/64245.pdf https://library.oapen.org/bitstream/20.500.12657/49315/1/64245.pdf InTechOpen 10.5772/intechopen.81829 10.5772/intechopen.81829 035ecc65-6737-43cf-a13a-6bdf67ce01f4 open access
spellingShingle neuroethics, neurobioethics, naturalism, nonnaturalism, neuroscience, psychology, ethics
thema EDItEUR::P Mathematics and Science::PS Biology, life sciences::PSA Life sciences: general issues::PSAN Neurosciences
Shook, John R.
Giordano, James
Chapter Naturalizing Neuroethics? A Syncretic Approach
title Chapter Naturalizing Neuroethics? A Syncretic Approach
title_full Chapter Naturalizing Neuroethics? A Syncretic Approach
title_fullStr Chapter Naturalizing Neuroethics? A Syncretic Approach
title_full_unstemmed Chapter Naturalizing Neuroethics? A Syncretic Approach
title_short Chapter Naturalizing Neuroethics? A Syncretic Approach
title_sort chapter naturalizing neuroethics a syncretic approach
topic neuroethics, neurobioethics, naturalism, nonnaturalism, neuroscience, psychology, ethics
thema EDItEUR::P Mathematics and Science::PS Biology, life sciences::PSA Life sciences: general issues::PSAN Neurosciences
topic_facet neuroethics, neurobioethics, naturalism, nonnaturalism, neuroscience, psychology, ethics
thema EDItEUR::P Mathematics and Science::PS Biology, life sciences::PSA Life sciences: general issues::PSAN Neurosciences
url ONIX_20210602_10.5772/intechopen.81829_429
work_keys_str_mv AT shookjohnr chapternaturalizingneuroethicsasyncreticapproach
AT giordanojames chapternaturalizingneuroethicsasyncreticapproach