Konzeptverfahren als Instrument einer gemeinwohlorientierten Stadtentwicklung
Who should profit from urban planning? An increasing number of stakeholders currently demand that planning policy leads to added value for the entire urban society and not just for individual groups: Designing for the common good! One instrument of public real estate policy that negotiates the commo...
সংরক্ষণ করুন:
| প্রধান লেখক: | |
|---|---|
| বিন্যাস: | Online |
| ভাষা: | জার্মান |
| প্রকাশিত: |
Universitätsverlag der Technischen Universität Berlin
2021
|
| বিষয়গুলি: | |
| অনলাইন ব্যবহার করুন: | ONIX_20210802_9783798331747_3 |
| ট্যাগগুলো: |
কোনো ট্যাগ নেই, প্রথমজন হিসাবে ট্যাগ করুন!
|
| _version_ | 1869523723888885760 |
|---|---|
| author | Gennies, Mona |
| author_browse | Gennies, Mona |
| author_facet | Gennies, Mona |
| author_sort | Gennies, Mona |
| collection | Directory of Open Access Books |
| description | Who should profit from urban planning? An increasing number of stakeholders currently demand that planning policy leads to added value for the entire urban society and not just for individual groups: Designing for the common good! One instrument of public real estate policy that negotiates the common good could be a conceptual allocation of public property (Konzeptverfahren). This instrument allows cities to allocate their land based on the quality of the idea for development and use instead of price-based bidding. In public invitations to tender, municipalities define a set of criteria that applicants can or must meet. The aim of this publication is to evaluate the orientation of such tenders towards the common good using a list of criteria compiled from the following existing assessments: The Federal Building Code (Baugesetzbuch); the city yield (Stadtrendite); a proposed federal policy to support not-for-profit housing companies (Wohngemeinnützigkeit); the Common Good Balance Sheet (Gemeinwohlökonomie); the Better-Life-Index (Wohlstandsforschung) and the common good criteria as defined in the federal tax code (Gemeinnützigkeit nach Abgabenordnung). Although there may be some variations in definitions of common good, at the core of these assessments are social criteria, ecological sustainability, and opportunities for participation. Beside these dominant categories, each assessment is supplemented by less common criteria which are grouped into six additional categories, giving an overview of how the common good is currently defined. This paper examines 28 invitations to tender based on the conceptual allocation of public property (Konzeptausschreibungen). Of these 28 invitations, each from a different German city, it was found that all contained, to some extent, the criteria for forming common good. As such, these tenders can be considered as supporting the common good. This script finds, however, that the categories participation, education and health should resonate more strongly in future tenders. The instrument (Konzeptverfahren) offers municipalities the opportunity to set development goals that are based on local needs and public interest criteria. But, as the comparison shows, there are significant differences between tendering procedures. Therefore, it should not be concluded that tendering based on the conceptual allocation of public property guarantees public interest-oriented urban development. |
| format | Online |
| id | doab-20.500.12854ir-71531 |
| institution | Directory of Open Access Books |
| language | ger |
| publishDate | 2021 |
| publishDateRange | 2021 |
| publishDateSort | 2021 |
| publisher | Universitätsverlag der Technischen Universität Berlin |
| publisherStr | Universitätsverlag der Technischen Universität Berlin |
| record_format | ojs |
| spelling | doab-20.500.12854ir-715312025-08-13T14:12:42Z Konzeptverfahren als Instrument einer gemeinwohlorientierten Stadtentwicklung Gennies, Mona common good real estate conceptional allocation public property public interest thema EDItEUR::R Earth Sciences, Geography, Environment, Planning::RP Regional and area planning::RPC Urban and municipal planning and policy thema EDItEUR::R Earth Sciences, Geography, Environment, Planning::RP Regional and area planning::RPC Urban and municipal planning and policy Who should profit from urban planning? An increasing number of stakeholders currently demand that planning policy leads to added value for the entire urban society and not just for individual groups: Designing for the common good! One instrument of public real estate policy that negotiates the common good could be a conceptual allocation of public property (Konzeptverfahren). This instrument allows cities to allocate their land based on the quality of the idea for development and use instead of price-based bidding. In public invitations to tender, municipalities define a set of criteria that applicants can or must meet. The aim of this publication is to evaluate the orientation of such tenders towards the common good using a list of criteria compiled from the following existing assessments: The Federal Building Code (Baugesetzbuch); the city yield (Stadtrendite); a proposed federal policy to support not-for-profit housing companies (Wohngemeinnützigkeit); the Common Good Balance Sheet (Gemeinwohlökonomie); the Better-Life-Index (Wohlstandsforschung) and the common good criteria as defined in the federal tax code (Gemeinnützigkeit nach Abgabenordnung). Although there may be some variations in definitions of common good, at the core of these assessments are social criteria, ecological sustainability, and opportunities for participation. Beside these dominant categories, each assessment is supplemented by less common criteria which are grouped into six additional categories, giving an overview of how the common good is currently defined. This paper examines 28 invitations to tender based on the conceptual allocation of public property (Konzeptausschreibungen). Of these 28 invitations, each from a different German city, it was found that all contained, to some extent, the criteria for forming common good. As such, these tenders can be considered as supporting the common good. This script finds, however, that the categories participation, education and health should resonate more strongly in future tenders. The instrument (Konzeptverfahren) offers municipalities the opportunity to set development goals that are based on local needs and public interest criteria. But, as the comparison shows, there are significant differences between tendering procedures. Therefore, it should not be concluded that tendering based on the conceptual allocation of public property guarantees public interest-oriented urban development. 2021-08-03T04:02:03Z 2021-08-03T04:02:03Z 2021-08-02T11:29:24Z 2021 book ONIX_20210802_9783798331747_3 OCN: 1266288205 2199-8728 https://library.oapen.org/handle/20.500.12657/50294 9783798331747 https://directory.doabooks.org/handle/20.500.12854/71531 ger ISR Impulse Online (bis Bd. 50: ISR Graue Reihe) open access image/jpeg image/jpeg image/jpeg image/jpeg Attribution 4.0 International Attribution 4.0 International Attribution 4.0 International Attribution 4.0 International https://library.oapen.org/bitstream/20.500.12657/50294/1/gennies_mona.pdf https://library.oapen.org/bitstream/20.500.12657/50294/1/gennies_mona.pdf https://library.oapen.org/bitstream/20.500.12657/50294/1/gennies_mona.pdf https://library.oapen.org/bitstream/20.500.12657/50294/1/gennies_mona.pdf Universitätsverlag der Technischen Universität Berlin 10.14279/depositonce-10398 10.14279/depositonce-10398 e39576fc-df94-4af7-8fbe-4f7c2d6b68f3 9783798331747 AG Universitätsverlage 144 Berlin open access |
| spellingShingle | common good real estate conceptional allocation public property public interest thema EDItEUR::R Earth Sciences, Geography, Environment, Planning::RP Regional and area planning::RPC Urban and municipal planning and policy thema EDItEUR::R Earth Sciences, Geography, Environment, Planning::RP Regional and area planning::RPC Urban and municipal planning and policy Gennies, Mona Konzeptverfahren als Instrument einer gemeinwohlorientierten Stadtentwicklung |
| title | Konzeptverfahren als Instrument einer gemeinwohlorientierten Stadtentwicklung |
| title_full | Konzeptverfahren als Instrument einer gemeinwohlorientierten Stadtentwicklung |
| title_fullStr | Konzeptverfahren als Instrument einer gemeinwohlorientierten Stadtentwicklung |
| title_full_unstemmed | Konzeptverfahren als Instrument einer gemeinwohlorientierten Stadtentwicklung |
| title_short | Konzeptverfahren als Instrument einer gemeinwohlorientierten Stadtentwicklung |
| title_sort | konzeptverfahren als instrument einer gemeinwohlorientierten stadtentwicklung |
| topic | common good real estate conceptional allocation public property public interest thema EDItEUR::R Earth Sciences, Geography, Environment, Planning::RP Regional and area planning::RPC Urban and municipal planning and policy thema EDItEUR::R Earth Sciences, Geography, Environment, Planning::RP Regional and area planning::RPC Urban and municipal planning and policy |
| topic_facet | common good real estate conceptional allocation public property public interest thema EDItEUR::R Earth Sciences, Geography, Environment, Planning::RP Regional and area planning::RPC Urban and municipal planning and policy thema EDItEUR::R Earth Sciences, Geography, Environment, Planning::RP Regional and area planning::RPC Urban and municipal planning and policy |
| url | ONIX_20210802_9783798331747_3 |
| work_keys_str_mv | AT genniesmona konzeptverfahrenalsinstrumenteinergemeinwohlorientiertenstadtentwicklung |