Out of Empire
The history of decolonization is usually written backward, as if the end-point (a world of juridically equivalent nation-states) was known from the start. But the routes out of colonial empire appear more varied. Some Africans sought equal rights within empire, others to federate among themselves; s...
Saved in:
| Hovedforfatter: | |
|---|---|
| Format: | Online |
| Sprog: | engelsk |
| Udgivet: |
Brill
2022
|
| Fag: | |
| Online adgang: | https://library.oapen.org/handle/20.500.12657/54623 |
| Tags: |
Ingen Tags, Vær først til at tagge denne postø!
|
| Summary: | The history of decolonization is usually written backward, as if the end-point (a world of juridically equivalent nation-states) was known from the start. But the routes out of colonial empire appear more varied. Some Africans sought equal rights within empire, others to federate among themselves; some sought independence. In London or Paris, officials realized they had to reform colonial empires, but not necessarily give them up. The idea of “development” became a way to assert that empires could be made both more productive and more legitimate. Frederick Cooper explores how these alternative possibilities narrowed between 1945 and approximately 1960. |
|---|