Regularisations of Irregularly Staying Migrants in the EU
‘Combatting’ irregular migration is one of the key challenges to migration management at EU level. The present book addresses one of the most pressing structural problems regarding the EU’s return policy: the low return rate of irregularly staying migrants. In this regard the EU Return Directive obl...
Сохранить в:
| Главный автор: | |
|---|---|
| Формат: | Online |
| Язык: | английский |
| Опубликовано: |
Nomos Verlagsgesellschaft mbH & Co. KG
2023
|
| Предметы: | |
| Online-ссылка: | https://directory.doabooks.org/handle/20.500.12854/96568 |
| Метки: |
Нет меток, Требуется 1-ая метка записи!
|
| _version_ | 1869530134426419200 |
|---|---|
| author | Hinterberger, Kevin Fredy |
| author_browse | Hinterberger, Kevin Fredy |
| author_facet | Hinterberger, Kevin Fredy |
| author_sort | Hinterberger, Kevin Fredy |
| collection | Directory of Open Access Books |
| description | ‘Combatting’ irregular migration is one of the key challenges to migration management at EU level. The present book addresses one of the most pressing structural problems regarding the EU’s return policy: the low return rate of irregularly staying migrants. In this regard the EU Return Directive obliges Member States to issue a return decision, yet only 40% of such decisions are enforced annually. Moreover, despite the political and legal efforts, the EU is not making any significant progress in enforcing the rules it has laid down in the Return Directive. The legislation of EU Member States may, however, serve as a source for possible solutions to ‘combat’ the problem of irregularly staying migrants. It is for this reason that the book compares the system of regularisations in Austria, Germany and Spain. Regularisations constitute an effective alternative to returns because they terminate the irregular residence of migrants, not through deportation, but rather by granting a right of residence. Regularisation is therefore understood as each legal decision that awards legal residency to irregularly staying migrants. As is shown by the examination and comparison of regularisations in Austria, Germany and Spain, differentiated systems of regularisation exist at national level. However, EU regularisations supplementing the present return policy would be more effective at ‘combatting’ irregular migration at EU level. |
| format | Online |
| id | doab-20.500.12854ir-96568 |
| institution | Directory of Open Access Books |
| language | eng |
| publishDate | 2023 |
| publishDateRange | 2023 |
| publishDateSort | 2023 |
| publisher | Nomos Verlagsgesellschaft mbH & Co. KG |
| publisherStr | Nomos Verlagsgesellschaft mbH & Co. KG |
| record_format | ojs |
| spelling | doab-20.500.12854ir-965682023-02-02T09:12:49Z Regularisations of Irregularly Staying Migrants in the EU Hinterberger, Kevin Fredy Abschiebung, Asylrecht, Aufenthaltsstatus, Comparative Legal Analysis, Duldung, Einbürgerung, EU Law, EU-Rückführungspolitik, Illegale Migration, Immigration Law, Irregular Immigration, Irregularly Staying Migrants, Migrationspolitik, Migrationsrecht, Migrationssteuerung, Public Law, Rechtsvergleich Regularisations, Return Directive, Rückführungsrichtlinie, Grundrechte, Menschenrechte, Irregulär aufhältige MigrantInnen, Regularisierungen, Aufenthaltsrecht, Vollzugsdefizit, Administrative Law, Migration Law, Deportation, Toleration, Illegal Migration, Irregular Migration, Residence Law, Comparative Law, Fundamental Rights, Human Rights, Return Gap, Return Deficit LBBR, 1QFE, LNAD3 ‘Combatting’ irregular migration is one of the key challenges to migration management at EU level. The present book addresses one of the most pressing structural problems regarding the EU’s return policy: the low return rate of irregularly staying migrants. In this regard the EU Return Directive obliges Member States to issue a return decision, yet only 40% of such decisions are enforced annually. Moreover, despite the political and legal efforts, the EU is not making any significant progress in enforcing the rules it has laid down in the Return Directive. The legislation of EU Member States may, however, serve as a source for possible solutions to ‘combat’ the problem of irregularly staying migrants. It is for this reason that the book compares the system of regularisations in Austria, Germany and Spain. Regularisations constitute an effective alternative to returns because they terminate the irregular residence of migrants, not through deportation, but rather by granting a right of residence. Regularisation is therefore understood as each legal decision that awards legal residency to irregularly staying migrants. As is shown by the examination and comparison of regularisations in Austria, Germany and Spain, differentiated systems of regularisation exist at national level. However, EU regularisations supplementing the present return policy would be more effective at ‘combatting’ irregular migration at EU level. Published ‘Combatting’ irregular migration is one of the key challenges to migration management at EU level. The present book addresses one of the most pressing structural problems regarding the EU’s return policy: the low return rate of irregularly staying migrants. In this regard the EU Return Directive obliges Member States to issue a return decision, yet only 40% of such decisions are enforced annually. Moreover, despite the political and legal efforts, the EU is not making any significant progress in enforcing the rules it has laid down in the Return Directive. The legislation of EU Member States may, however, serve as a source for possible solutions to ‘combat’ the problem of irregularly staying migrants. It is for this reason that the book compares the system of regularisations in Austria, Germany and Spain. Regularisations constitute an effective alternative to returns because they terminate the irregular residence of migrants, not through deportation, but rather by granting a right of residence. Regularisation is therefore understood as each legal decision that awards legal residency to irregularly staying migrants. As is shown by the examination and comparison of regularisations in Austria, Germany and Spain, differentiated systems of regularisation exist at national level. However, EU regularisations supplementing the present return policy would be more effective at ‘combatting’ irregular migration at EU level. 2023-02-02T09:12:47Z 2023-02-02T09:12:47Z 2023-02-01 book 978-3-7489-1279-8 https://directory.doabooks.org/handle/20.500.12854/96568 eng Schriften zum Migrationsrecht image/png Attribution 4.0 International https://www.nomos-shop.de/nomos/titel/regularizations-of-irregularly-staying-migrants-in-the-eu-id-101086/ https://doi.org/10.5771/9783748912798 Nomos Verlagsgesellschaft mbH & Co. KG 10.5771/9783748912798 ‘Combatting’ irregular migration is one of the key challenges to migration management at EU level. The present book addresses one of the most pressing structural problems regarding the EU’s return policy: the low return rate of irregularly staying migrants. In this regard the EU Return Directive obliges Member States to issue a return decision, yet only 40% of such decisions are enforced annually. Moreover, despite the political and legal efforts, the EU is not making any significant progress in enforcing the rules it has laid down in the Return Directive. The legislation of EU Member States may, however, serve as a source for possible solutions to ‘combat’ the problem of irregularly staying migrants. It is for this reason that the book compares the system of regularisations in Austria, Germany and Spain. Regularisations constitute an effective alternative to returns because they terminate the irregular residence of migrants, not through deportation, but rather by granting a right of residence. Regularisation is therefore understood as each legal decision that awards legal residency to irregularly staying migrants. As is shown by the examination and comparison of regularisations in Austria, Germany and Spain, differentiated systems of regularisation exist at national level. However, EU regularisations supplementing the present return policy would be more effective at ‘combatting’ irregular migration at EU level. 10.5771/9783748912798 20c8b06d-3b2b-4af2-acda-fbcfdfea5744 978-3-7489-1279-8 Band 43 398 Baden-Baden open access |
| spellingShingle | Abschiebung, Asylrecht, Aufenthaltsstatus, Comparative Legal Analysis, Duldung, Einbürgerung, EU Law, EU-Rückführungspolitik, Illegale Migration, Immigration Law, Irregular Immigration, Irregularly Staying Migrants, Migrationspolitik, Migrationsrecht, Migrationssteuerung, Public Law, Rechtsvergleich Regularisations, Return Directive, Rückführungsrichtlinie, Grundrechte, Menschenrechte, Irregulär aufhältige MigrantInnen, Regularisierungen, Aufenthaltsrecht, Vollzugsdefizit, Administrative Law, Migration Law, Deportation, Toleration, Illegal Migration, Irregular Migration, Residence Law, Comparative Law, Fundamental Rights, Human Rights, Return Gap, Return Deficit LBBR, 1QFE, LNAD3 Hinterberger, Kevin Fredy Regularisations of Irregularly Staying Migrants in the EU |
| title | Regularisations of Irregularly Staying Migrants in the EU |
| title_full | Regularisations of Irregularly Staying Migrants in the EU |
| title_fullStr | Regularisations of Irregularly Staying Migrants in the EU |
| title_full_unstemmed | Regularisations of Irregularly Staying Migrants in the EU |
| title_short | Regularisations of Irregularly Staying Migrants in the EU |
| title_sort | regularisations of irregularly staying migrants in the eu |
| topic | Abschiebung, Asylrecht, Aufenthaltsstatus, Comparative Legal Analysis, Duldung, Einbürgerung, EU Law, EU-Rückführungspolitik, Illegale Migration, Immigration Law, Irregular Immigration, Irregularly Staying Migrants, Migrationspolitik, Migrationsrecht, Migrationssteuerung, Public Law, Rechtsvergleich Regularisations, Return Directive, Rückführungsrichtlinie, Grundrechte, Menschenrechte, Irregulär aufhältige MigrantInnen, Regularisierungen, Aufenthaltsrecht, Vollzugsdefizit, Administrative Law, Migration Law, Deportation, Toleration, Illegal Migration, Irregular Migration, Residence Law, Comparative Law, Fundamental Rights, Human Rights, Return Gap, Return Deficit LBBR, 1QFE, LNAD3 |
| topic_facet | Abschiebung, Asylrecht, Aufenthaltsstatus, Comparative Legal Analysis, Duldung, Einbürgerung, EU Law, EU-Rückführungspolitik, Illegale Migration, Immigration Law, Irregular Immigration, Irregularly Staying Migrants, Migrationspolitik, Migrationsrecht, Migrationssteuerung, Public Law, Rechtsvergleich Regularisations, Return Directive, Rückführungsrichtlinie, Grundrechte, Menschenrechte, Irregulär aufhältige MigrantInnen, Regularisierungen, Aufenthaltsrecht, Vollzugsdefizit, Administrative Law, Migration Law, Deportation, Toleration, Illegal Migration, Irregular Migration, Residence Law, Comparative Law, Fundamental Rights, Human Rights, Return Gap, Return Deficit LBBR, 1QFE, LNAD3 |
| url | https://directory.doabooks.org/handle/20.500.12854/96568 |
| work_keys_str_mv | AT hinterbergerkevinfredy regularisationsofirregularlystayingmigrantsintheeu |