Class Action Dilemmas

Class action lawsuits--allowing one or a few plaintiffs to represent many who seek redress--have long been controversial. The current controversy, centered on lawsuits for money damages, is characterized by sharp disagreement among stakeholders about the kinds of suits being filed, whether plaintiff...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Hensler, Deborah R., Dombey-Moore, Bonnie, Giddens, Elizabeth, Gross, Jennifer, Moller, Erik
Format: Online
Language:English
Published: RAND Corporation 2023
Subjects:
Online Access:ONIX_20231005_9780833043948_467
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
_version_ 1869517332323237888
author Hensler, Deborah R.
Dombey-Moore, Bonnie
Giddens, Elizabeth
Gross, Jennifer
Moller, Erik
author_browse Dombey-Moore, Bonnie
Giddens, Elizabeth
Gross, Jennifer
Hensler, Deborah R.
Moller, Erik
author_facet Hensler, Deborah R.
Dombey-Moore, Bonnie
Giddens, Elizabeth
Gross, Jennifer
Moller, Erik
author_sort Hensler, Deborah R.
collection Directory of Open Access Books
description Class action lawsuits--allowing one or a few plaintiffs to represent many who seek redress--have long been controversial. The current controversy, centered on lawsuits for money damages, is characterized by sharp disagreement among stakeholders about the kinds of suits being filed, whether plaintiffs' claims are meritorious, and whether resolutions to class actions are fair or socially desirable. Ultimately, these concerns lead many to wonder, Are class actions worth their costs to society and to business? Do they do more harm than good? To describe the landscape of current damage class action litigation, elucidate problems, and identify solutions, the RAND Institute for Civil Justice conducted a study using qualitative and quantitative research methods. The researchers concluded that the controversy over damage class actions has proven intractable because it implicates deeply held but sharply contested ideological views among stakeholders. Nevertheless, many of the political antagonists agree that class action practices merit improvement. The authors argue that both practices and outcomes could be substantially improved if more judges would supervise class action litigation more actively and scrutinize proposed settlements and fee awards more carefully. Educating and empowering judges to take more responsibility for case outcomes--and ensuring that they have the resources to do so--can help the civil justice system achieve a better balance between the public goals of class actions and the private interests that drive them.
format Online
id doab-20.500.12854ir-114693
institution Directory of Open Access Books
language eng
publishDate 2023
publishDateRange 2023
publishDateSort 2023
publisher RAND Corporation
publisherStr RAND Corporation
record_format ojs
spelling doab-20.500.12854ir-1146932024-03-30T23:23:32Z Class Action Dilemmas Hensler, Deborah R. Dombey-Moore, Bonnie Giddens, Elizabeth Gross, Jennifer Moller, Erik Law thema EDItEUR::L Law::LA Jurisprudence and general issues::LAF Systems of law::LAFD Systems of law: civil codes / civil law Class action lawsuits--allowing one or a few plaintiffs to represent many who seek redress--have long been controversial. The current controversy, centered on lawsuits for money damages, is characterized by sharp disagreement among stakeholders about the kinds of suits being filed, whether plaintiffs' claims are meritorious, and whether resolutions to class actions are fair or socially desirable. Ultimately, these concerns lead many to wonder, Are class actions worth their costs to society and to business? Do they do more harm than good? To describe the landscape of current damage class action litigation, elucidate problems, and identify solutions, the RAND Institute for Civil Justice conducted a study using qualitative and quantitative research methods. The researchers concluded that the controversy over damage class actions has proven intractable because it implicates deeply held but sharply contested ideological views among stakeholders. Nevertheless, many of the political antagonists agree that class action practices merit improvement. The authors argue that both practices and outcomes could be substantially improved if more judges would supervise class action litigation more actively and scrutinize proposed settlements and fee awards more carefully. Educating and empowering judges to take more responsibility for case outcomes--and ensuring that they have the resources to do so--can help the civil justice system achieve a better balance between the public goals of class actions and the private interests that drive them. 2023-10-05T10:12:34Z 2023-10-05T10:12:34Z 2000 book ONIX_20231005_9780833043948_467 9780833043948 9780833026019 https://directory.doabooks.org/handle/20.500.12854/114693 eng image/jpeg n/a https://www.jstor.org/stable/10.7249/MR969ICJ RAND Corporation 10.7249/MR969ICJ 10.7249/MR969ICJ 47ac0b54-b121-491c-a9c8-5ca6776e27cb 9780833043948 9780833026019 open access
spellingShingle Law
thema EDItEUR::L Law::LA Jurisprudence and general issues::LAF Systems of law::LAFD Systems of law: civil codes / civil law
Hensler, Deborah R.
Dombey-Moore, Bonnie
Giddens, Elizabeth
Gross, Jennifer
Moller, Erik
Class Action Dilemmas
title Class Action Dilemmas
title_full Class Action Dilemmas
title_fullStr Class Action Dilemmas
title_full_unstemmed Class Action Dilemmas
title_short Class Action Dilemmas
title_sort class action dilemmas
topic Law
thema EDItEUR::L Law::LA Jurisprudence and general issues::LAF Systems of law::LAFD Systems of law: civil codes / civil law
topic_facet Law
thema EDItEUR::L Law::LA Jurisprudence and general issues::LAF Systems of law::LAFD Systems of law: civil codes / civil law
url ONIX_20231005_9780833043948_467
work_keys_str_mv AT henslerdeborahr classactiondilemmas
AT dombeymoorebonnie classactiondilemmas
AT giddenselizabeth classactiondilemmas
AT grossjennifer classactiondilemmas
AT mollererik classactiondilemmas