Chapter L’art. 2103 c.c. dopo il Jobs Act e la latitudine dell’obbligo datoriale di repêchage

The essay analyzes the impact of the reform of art. 2103 c.c., which linked the employer’s ius variandi to the collective bargaining’s classifications, on the obligation to employ the worker in different tasks to avoid dismissal (cd. repêchage). After criticizing the lack of attention of the legisla...

ver descrição completa

Na minha lista:
Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor principal: CALCATERRA, Luca
Formato: Online
Idioma:Língua italiana
Publicado em: Firenze University Press 2025
Assuntos:
Acesso em linha:ONIX_20241220_9791221505078_549
Tags: Adicionar Tag
Sem tags, seja o primeiro a adicionar uma tag!
_version_ 1869519407518056448
author CALCATERRA, Luca
author_browse CALCATERRA, Luca
author_facet CALCATERRA, Luca
author_sort CALCATERRA, Luca
collection Directory of Open Access Books
description The essay analyzes the impact of the reform of art. 2103 c.c., which linked the employer’s ius variandi to the collective bargaining’s classifications, on the obligation to employ the worker in different tasks to avoid dismissal (cd. repêchage). After criticizing the lack of attention of the legislator for the consequences of the 2015 reform, the work focuses on the effort made in the last contract renewals, that in many sectors have linked classifications to the professionalism of the workers, highlighting that these efforts do not seem sufficient to solve the problems posed by the reform of art. 2103 c.c. The pivot of the system is then identified in the obligation of training provided for under art. 2103 c.c. third paragraph, seen as a form of reasonable arrangement as those provided for by the UN Convention of 2006, EC Directive 2000/78 and national legislation. It is highlighted that the logical background common to all forms of adaptation of the organization aimed at avoiding dismissals is that of the resolution for excessive burdens referred to in art. 1467 c.c. On this basis, finally, the jurisprudence that identifies the limit of organizational adaptations useful to avoid dismissal in the possession by the worker of the professionalism necessary for the performance of the tasks of destination is criticized.
format Online
id doab-20.500.12854ir-149773
institution Directory of Open Access Books
language ita
publishDate 2025
publishDateRange 2025
publishDateSort 2025
publisher Firenze University Press
publisherStr Firenze University Press
record_format ojs
spelling doab-20.500.12854ir-1497732025-01-15T12:50:53Z Chapter L’art. 2103 c.c. dopo il Jobs Act e la latitudine dell’obbligo datoriale di repêchage CALCATERRA, Luca Ius variandi repêchage 2015 reform obligation of training thema EDItEUR::L Law::LN Laws of specific jurisdictions and specific areas of law::LNH Employment and labour law: general The essay analyzes the impact of the reform of art. 2103 c.c., which linked the employer’s ius variandi to the collective bargaining’s classifications, on the obligation to employ the worker in different tasks to avoid dismissal (cd. repêchage). After criticizing the lack of attention of the legislator for the consequences of the 2015 reform, the work focuses on the effort made in the last contract renewals, that in many sectors have linked classifications to the professionalism of the workers, highlighting that these efforts do not seem sufficient to solve the problems posed by the reform of art. 2103 c.c. The pivot of the system is then identified in the obligation of training provided for under art. 2103 c.c. third paragraph, seen as a form of reasonable arrangement as those provided for by the UN Convention of 2006, EC Directive 2000/78 and national legislation. It is highlighted that the logical background common to all forms of adaptation of the organization aimed at avoiding dismissals is that of the resolution for excessive burdens referred to in art. 1467 c.c. On this basis, finally, the jurisprudence that identifies the limit of organizational adaptations useful to avoid dismissal in the possession by the worker of the professionalism necessary for the performance of the tasks of destination is criticized. 2025-01-15T12:50:52Z 2025-01-15T12:50:52Z 2024-12-20T12:50:43Z 2024 chapter ONIX_20241220_9791221505078_549 2704-5919 https://library.oapen.org/handle/20.500.12657/96757 9791221505078 https://directory.doabooks.org/handle/20.500.12854/149773 ita Studi e saggi open access image/jpeg Attribution 4.0 International https://library.oapen.org/bitstream/20.500.12657/96757/1/43093.pdf Firenze University Press 10.36253/979-12-215-0507-8.11 10.36253/979-12-215-0507-8.11 2ec4474d-93b1-4cfa-b313-9c6019b51b1a 9791221505078 20 Florence open access
spellingShingle Ius variandi
repêchage
2015 reform
obligation of training
thema EDItEUR::L Law::LN Laws of specific jurisdictions and specific areas of law::LNH Employment and labour law: general
CALCATERRA, Luca
Chapter L’art. 2103 c.c. dopo il Jobs Act e la latitudine dell’obbligo datoriale di repêchage
title Chapter L’art. 2103 c.c. dopo il Jobs Act e la latitudine dell’obbligo datoriale di repêchage
title_full Chapter L’art. 2103 c.c. dopo il Jobs Act e la latitudine dell’obbligo datoriale di repêchage
title_fullStr Chapter L’art. 2103 c.c. dopo il Jobs Act e la latitudine dell’obbligo datoriale di repêchage
title_full_unstemmed Chapter L’art. 2103 c.c. dopo il Jobs Act e la latitudine dell’obbligo datoriale di repêchage
title_short Chapter L’art. 2103 c.c. dopo il Jobs Act e la latitudine dell’obbligo datoriale di repêchage
title_sort chapter l art 2103 c c dopo il jobs act e la latitudine dell obbligo datoriale di repechage
topic Ius variandi
repêchage
2015 reform
obligation of training
thema EDItEUR::L Law::LN Laws of specific jurisdictions and specific areas of law::LNH Employment and labour law: general
topic_facet Ius variandi
repêchage
2015 reform
obligation of training
thema EDItEUR::L Law::LN Laws of specific jurisdictions and specific areas of law::LNH Employment and labour law: general
url ONIX_20241220_9791221505078_549
work_keys_str_mv AT calcaterraluca chapterlart2103ccdopoiljobsactelalatitudinedellobbligodatorialedirepechage