Gerichtsrhetorik
The author argues that constitutional courts can be understood as rhetorical actors and that their decisions can be read as persuasive texts. To this end, he analyses the reasoning of decisions of the German Federal Constitutional Court, the Austrian Constitutional Court and the European Court of Ju...
Guardat en:
| Autor principal: | |
|---|---|
| Format: | Online |
| Idioma: | alemany |
| Publicat: |
Duncker & Humblot
2025
|
| Matèries: | |
| Accés en línia: | ONIX_20250227_9783428592036_22 |
| Etiquetes: |
Sense etiquetes, Sigues el primer a etiquetar aquest registre!
|
| Sumari: | The author argues that constitutional courts can be understood as rhetorical actors and that their decisions can be read as persuasive texts. To this end, he analyses the reasoning of decisions of the German Federal Constitutional Court, the Austrian Constitutional Court and the European Court of Justice. His interdisciplinary approach highlights the importance of rhetoric as a means of facilitating acceptance of judicial decisions. |
|---|