Gerichtsrhetorik

The author argues that constitutional courts can be understood as rhetorical actors and that their decisions can be read as persuasive texts. To this end, he analyses the reasoning of decisions of the German Federal Constitutional Court, the Austrian Constitutional Court and the European Court of Ju...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Schnetter, Marcus
Format: Online
Language:German
Published: Duncker & Humblot 2025
Subjects:
Online Access:ONIX_20250227_9783428592036_22
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
_version_ 1869528240681385984
author Schnetter, Marcus
author_browse Schnetter, Marcus
author_facet Schnetter, Marcus
author_sort Schnetter, Marcus
collection Directory of Open Access Books
description The author argues that constitutional courts can be understood as rhetorical actors and that their decisions can be read as persuasive texts. To this end, he analyses the reasoning of decisions of the German Federal Constitutional Court, the Austrian Constitutional Court and the European Court of Justice. His interdisciplinary approach highlights the importance of rhetoric as a means of facilitating acceptance of judicial decisions.
format Online
id doab-20.500.12854ir-153309
institution Directory of Open Access Books
language ger
publishDate 2025
publishDateRange 2025
publishDateSort 2025
publisher Duncker & Humblot
publisherStr Duncker & Humblot
record_format ojs
spelling doab-20.500.12854ir-1533092025-02-27T10:32:36Z Gerichtsrhetorik Schnetter, Marcus Legal rhetoric Constitutional court Fundamental rights protection thema EDItEUR::L Law::LA Jurisprudence and general issues::LAB Methods, theory and philosophy of law The author argues that constitutional courts can be understood as rhetorical actors and that their decisions can be read as persuasive texts. To this end, he analyses the reasoning of decisions of the German Federal Constitutional Court, the Austrian Constitutional Court and the European Court of Justice. His interdisciplinary approach highlights the importance of rhetoric as a means of facilitating acceptance of judicial decisions. 2025-02-27T10:32:35Z 2025-02-27T10:32:35Z 2024 book ONIX_20250227_9783428592036_22 9783428592036 9783428192038 https://directory.doabooks.org/handle/20.500.12854/153309 ger Sprache und Medialität des Rechts / Language and Media of Law (SMR) image/jpeg Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International https://www.duncker-humblot.de/9783428592036 https://elibrary.duncker-humblot.com/9783428592036 Duncker & Humblot 10.3790/978-3-428-59203-6 The author argues that constitutional courts can be understood as rhetorical actors and that their decisions can be read as persuasive texts. To this end, he analyses the reasoning of decisions of the German Federal Constitutional Court, the Austrian Constitutional Court and the European Court of Justice. His interdisciplinary approach highlights the importance of rhetoric as a means of facilitating acceptance of judicial decisions. 10.3790/978-3-428-59203-6 65d50a8a-1a1d-48a7-b38f-f049cf105e5c 9783428592036 9783428192038 8 386 Berlin open access
spellingShingle Legal rhetoric
Constitutional court
Fundamental rights protection
thema EDItEUR::L Law::LA Jurisprudence and general issues::LAB Methods, theory and philosophy of law
Schnetter, Marcus
Gerichtsrhetorik
title Gerichtsrhetorik
title_full Gerichtsrhetorik
title_fullStr Gerichtsrhetorik
title_full_unstemmed Gerichtsrhetorik
title_short Gerichtsrhetorik
title_sort gerichtsrhetorik
topic Legal rhetoric
Constitutional court
Fundamental rights protection
thema EDItEUR::L Law::LA Jurisprudence and general issues::LAB Methods, theory and philosophy of law
topic_facet Legal rhetoric
Constitutional court
Fundamental rights protection
thema EDItEUR::L Law::LA Jurisprudence and general issues::LAB Methods, theory and philosophy of law
url ONIX_20250227_9783428592036_22
work_keys_str_mv AT schnettermarcus gerichtsrhetorik