Chapter "Methodological critique" in assessing the postdoctoral achievements
“Methodological critique” is a form of scientific critique along with philosophical, empirical, theoretical or logical critique. It does not require any special justification to recognize this form of critique as the most important, the most meaningful and most decisive in assessing the postdoctoral...
Saved in:
| 主要作者: | |
|---|---|
| 格式: | Online |
| 語言: | 波兰语 |
| 出版: |
Wydawnictwo Uniwersytetu Łódzkiego
2025
|
| 在線閱讀: | ONIX_20250307_9788381427166_501 |
| 標簽: |
沒有標簽, 成為第一個標記此記錄!
|
| _version_ | 1869513806291402752 |
|---|---|
| author | Hejnicka-Bezwińska, Teresa |
| author_browse | Hejnicka-Bezwińska, Teresa |
| author_facet | Hejnicka-Bezwińska, Teresa |
| author_sort | Hejnicka-Bezwińska, Teresa |
| collection | Directory of Open Access Books |
| description | “Methodological critique” is a form of scientific critique along with philosophical, empirical, theoretical or logical critique. It does not require any special justification to recognize this form of critique as the most important, the most meaningful and most decisive in assessing the postdoctoral achievements. In the summary, I refer only to one legal argument that obtaining a postdoctoral degree is a kind of “pass”, entitling one to adjudicate on the scientific achievements of others and to appear in various roles related to awarding (or refusing to award) the academic degree of a particular person. In the chapter, I present some of the most important questions to which I was seeking answers, assessing the work indicated as the main scientific achievement. This unitary example seems to be a good illustration of the problems, controversies and dilemmas appearing when one is preparing an opinion for a meeting of the Postdoctoral Degree Awarding Committee. Uncovering your own reflection on a specific work can be a contribution to the discussion of the reviewer’s role in the postdoctoral degree procedure and the place and role of methodological critique in this procedure, especially when the author of the indicated achievement has not shown due diligence to reliably present and authenticate his/her research concept. |
| format | Online |
| id | doab-20.500.12854ir-155076 |
| institution | Directory of Open Access Books |
| language | pol |
| publishDate | 2025 |
| publishDateRange | 2025 |
| publishDateSort | 2025 |
| publisher | Wydawnictwo Uniwersytetu Łódzkiego |
| publisherStr | Wydawnictwo Uniwersytetu Łódzkiego |
| record_format | ojs |
| spelling | doab-20.500.12854ir-1550762025-03-07T13:53:05Z Chapter "Methodological critique" in assessing the postdoctoral achievements Hejnicka-Bezwińska, Teresa “Methodological critique” is a form of scientific critique along with philosophical, empirical, theoretical or logical critique. It does not require any special justification to recognize this form of critique as the most important, the most meaningful and most decisive in assessing the postdoctoral achievements. In the summary, I refer only to one legal argument that obtaining a postdoctoral degree is a kind of “pass”, entitling one to adjudicate on the scientific achievements of others and to appear in various roles related to awarding (or refusing to award) the academic degree of a particular person. In the chapter, I present some of the most important questions to which I was seeking answers, assessing the work indicated as the main scientific achievement. This unitary example seems to be a good illustration of the problems, controversies and dilemmas appearing when one is preparing an opinion for a meeting of the Postdoctoral Degree Awarding Committee. Uncovering your own reflection on a specific work can be a contribution to the discussion of the reviewer’s role in the postdoctoral degree procedure and the place and role of methodological critique in this procedure, especially when the author of the indicated achievement has not shown due diligence to reliably present and authenticate his/her research concept. 2025-03-07T13:53:03Z 2025-03-07T13:53:03Z 2019 chapter ONIX_20250307_9788381427166_501 9788381427166 9788381427159 https://directory.doabooks.org/handle/20.500.12854/155076 pol image/jpeg Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International https://www.press.uni.lodz.pl/index.php/wul/catalog/book/1054 Wydawnictwo Uniwersytetu Łódzkiego 10.18778/8142-715-9.10 “Methodological critique” is a form of scientific critique along with philosophical, empirical, theoretical or logical critique. It does not require any special justification to recognize this form of critique as the most important, the most meaningful and most decisive in assessing the postdoctoral achievements. In the summary, I refer only to one legal argument that obtaining a postdoctoral degree is a kind of “pass”, entitling one to adjudicate on the scientific achievements of others and to appear in various roles related to awarding (or refusing to award) the academic degree of a particular person. In the chapter, I present some of the most important questions to which I was seeking answers, assessing the work indicated as the main scientific achievement. This unitary example seems to be a good illustration of the problems, controversies and dilemmas appearing when one is preparing an opinion for a meeting of the Postdoctoral Degree Awarding Committee. Uncovering your own reflection on a specific work can be a contribution to the discussion of the reviewer’s role in the postdoctoral degree procedure and the place and role of methodological critique in this procedure, especially when the author of the indicated achievement has not shown due diligence to reliably present and authenticate his/her research concept. 10.18778/8142-715-9.10 83bfe9c9-323d-4283-b087-d859fd9af314 9788381427166 9788381427159 157-171 open access |
| spellingShingle | Hejnicka-Bezwińska, Teresa Chapter "Methodological critique" in assessing the postdoctoral achievements |
| title | Chapter "Methodological critique" in assessing the postdoctoral achievements |
| title_full | Chapter "Methodological critique" in assessing the postdoctoral achievements |
| title_fullStr | Chapter "Methodological critique" in assessing the postdoctoral achievements |
| title_full_unstemmed | Chapter "Methodological critique" in assessing the postdoctoral achievements |
| title_short | Chapter "Methodological critique" in assessing the postdoctoral achievements |
| title_sort | chapter methodological critique in assessing the postdoctoral achievements |
| url | ONIX_20250307_9788381427166_501 |
| work_keys_str_mv | AT hejnickabezwinskateresa chaptermethodologicalcritiqueinassessingthepostdoctoralachievements |