Buchumschlag

Schaden, Interesse und Differenzhypothese

Weitere Versionen anzeigen (1)

The state of legal disorder that exists in the dogma of tort law is examined in a longitudinal study of the history of dogma to determine its origins. To this end, the present work focuses on the basic concepts of tort law. The origins of the difference hypothesis are examined and its transferabilit...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
1. Verfasser: Birkholz, Marco
Format: Online
Sprache:Deutsch
Veröffentlicht: Duncker & Humblot 2026
Schlagworte:
Differenzhypothese
Interesse
Naturalrestitution
Schadensbegriff
Schadensrecht
Schuldrecht
thema EDItEUR::L Law::LN Laws of specific jurisdictions and specific areas of law::LNA Legal systems: general::LNAC Legal systems: civil procedure, litigation and dispute resolution::LNAC1 Civil remedies::LNAC14 Damages and compensation
thema EDItEUR::L Law::LN Laws of specific jurisdictions and specific areas of law::LNB Private or civil law: general
thema EDItEUR::1 Place qualifiers::1D Europe::1DF Central Europe::1DFG Germany
Online-Zugang:https://directory.doabooks.org/handle/20.500.12854/172055
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie das erste Tag hinzu!
Zusammenfassung:The state of legal disorder that exists in the dogma of tort law is examined in a longitudinal study of the history of dogma to determine its origins. To this end, the present work focuses on the basic concepts of tort law. The origins of the difference hypothesis are examined and its transferability to contemporary tort law is critically questioned. The long-contested concept of damages is traced back to its conceptual and dogmatic core.

Ähnliche Einträge