Omslagsbillede

Insolvenzverwalterhaftung in Deutschland und den USA

The liability of the insolvency administrator pursuant to sec. 60 InsO is a continuous subject of legal discourse. There are repeated calls for a limitation of the liability risk. This work pursues a new approach: the fundamentals and function of the insolvency administrator's liability are examined...

Fuld beskrivelse

Saved in:
Hovedforfatter: Altmeyer, Nicolas
Format: Online
Sprog:tysk
Udgivet: 2022
Fag:
Bankruptcy Law, bankruptcy trustee, Konkursverwalter, Rechtsvergleichung, Sanierungsrecht, Hinz, Breach of fiduciary duty, Funktion der Insolvenzverwalterhaftung, McNulta v. Lochridge, Barton v. Barbour, Mosser v. Darrow, Barton Doctrine, McNulta Rule, breach of fiduciary duty, § 60 InsO, Haftungsrisiko des Insolvenzverwalters Bankruptcy Code U.S.-amerikanisches Insolvenzrecht, Business Judgment Rule, Herrschaft und Haftung, Chapter 11, Chapter 7, Haftung des Bankruptcy Trustee
LAM
Online adgang:https://directory.doabooks.org/handle/20.500.12854/81238
Tags: Tilføj Tag
Ingen Tags, Vær først til at tagge denne postø!
Summary:The liability of the insolvency administrator pursuant to sec. 60 InsO is a continuous subject of legal discourse. There are repeated calls for a limitation of the liability risk. This work pursues a new approach: the fundamentals and function of the insolvency administrator's liability are examined and, for the first time, compared with the liability of the bankruptcy trustee under U.S. bankruptcy law. Among other things, it is revealed that the bankruptcy trustee is subject to far greater court and creditor control than his German counterpart and that the principle of "concurrence of control and liability," which is essential for the comparatively strict liability under sec. 60 InsO, is not universally implemented.

Lignende værker